Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lott: Scrap Medicare drugs, pay for storm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:40 AM
Original message
Lott: Scrap Medicare drugs, pay for storm

http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050921/NEWS0110/509210365/1260

Lott: Scrap Medicare drugs, pay for storm

WASHINGTON — Congress could help pay for rebuilding efforts in Mississippi and other areas hit by Hurricane Katrina if it halted the $700 billion Medicare prescription drug program, former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said Tuesday.

Lott, R-Miss., told reporters his vote in November 2003 for the Medicare drug program, which has nearly doubled its projected cost, was one of two he most regretted in his 34 years on Capitol Hill.

The new Medicare drug benefit is scheduled to take effect in January. President Bush and House Majority leader Tom DeLay say the program is too far along to stop.

Lott was unconvinced by that argument.

...

Lott made his comments before heading into a Senate Republican policy lunch, where the topic was how to pay for Katrina rebuilding efforts. Guests included DeLay, R-Texas, Vice President Dick Cheney and President Bush's budget chief Josh Bolten.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know of a self destructive war we could save money on.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. I've probably talked to a dozen people
about how to finance the gulf rebuilding and every fucking one of them says how about stop pouring money into that cf in Iraq. Even those who may have bought into the bullshit originally have now come to realize that we aren't accomplishing jack now.

On the bright side the pace of US casualties seems to have slowed considerably but I suspect this is only because we have stopped seeking out and engaging the insurgents and have retreated to a defensive posture inside the green zone and other "safe" havens.

And if this is the case, wtf are we even there for? We have no power to affect the political future of Iraq. we can't even protect the oil fields. Our troops are at the mercy of events now, events which we set in motion but which we are now powerless to control.

The whole fuckup isn't very becoming to our image as the "world's only superpower".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. I say if exxon wants an oil war, let exxon pay for it. Iraq is a
HUGH!!!! drain on America. And it's only going to get worse, not better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
69. LOTT A RACIST SCUMBAG
Lott was unconvinced by that argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Man, that's gonna pay for one NICE house. Can't wait to sit on the porch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. Porch, Porch...we want Porch!
"Condi, honey, why don't you sing us a spiritual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is a terrible program anyway.
The only time I agree with Trent. Drop it now and start over later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good idea
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 06:51 AM by Sgent
Then we can make sure we kill all those people Haley kicked of Medicaid earlier this year, in anticipation of the the Medicare benefit. Wouldn't want to let the elderly and disabled live longer, they might vote against us since they are all democrats. :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was kind of counting on that.......
to get my prescription drug bill down to a manageable level, but I've never really had much faith in it to begin with.
Of course the transportation bill must be kept intact, the bridge to nowhere MUST be built and lord knows the freeways in LA need new shrubbery. :eyes:
Why is it that the first place these dorks look when it comes to cutting spending is always programs that actually HELP people? god forbid we should cut the fucking pentagon's bloated, pork filled budget!
I'm so sick of fucking Republicans it's probably going to take yet MORE prescriptions to get myself feeling well again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
35. Medicare cards: No match for online prices
If you want to save money on prescription drugs, buy them online. The Medicare prescription drug 'benefit' is a total scam. Drug companies and medical insurance companies like it, though.

Please consider this article from Consumer Reports:

***

August 2004

The Medicare-approved drug discount cards introduced on June 1 promise lower prices on prescription medications. But you can get a better deal by shopping online.

We compared the cost of five prescription drugs (which were among the top sellers last year) in five cities--Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, New York, and San Bernardino, Calif.--on one day in mid-May 2004. We checked prices from all the discount-card programs in each city and at the www.costco.com and www.drugstore.com Web sites. San Bernardino had seven cards available; the other locations, about three dozen each.

As the table below shows, discount cards often had much higher prices. Except for the price paid for Prevacid, the Medicare cards’ average prices were invariably higher than those of the Web sites. Even the lowest discount-card prices we found were usually only $1 to $3 better for 30 tablets than those at the online outlets. The online sellers do have modest shipping charges: $1.50 at Drugstore.com and $2 at Costco.com.

Before you or any family members sign up for a Medicare drug-discount card, do some comparison shopping. Go to www.medicare.gov, or call 800-633-4227, and then check prices at www.drugstore.com and www.costco.com.

http://www.consumerreports.org/main/detailv4.jsp?CONTENT%3C%3Ecnt_id=450955&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=162687&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=333141&bmUID=1127310459589



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
54. It's people like you who always pay the price
ClintonTyree, for the greed of the conservatives. What about rolling back the tax breaks to the wealthy? It won't hurt them, they won't have to choose between food and medicine, because they will still be incredibly rich. No, Chimp won't do that. He'll tell you, and me, and millions like us that it's too bad, we should have been born to different parents, ones who provided us with large trust funds.

Republican policies KILL people. They kill overtly, like in Iraq, and they do it by stealth, by cutting the safety net that keeps ordinary people from being killed when their personal lives crash. They send jobs overseas, pay less for the jobs that remain, keep more and more Americans without health insurance, and suffer no shame from doing those things.

Why not just leave Iraq, roll back the tax cuts for the wealthy, and take care of the vulnerable in this country for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. We need the Dems to SLAM these guys on this one
they refuse to roll back tax cuts to the wealthiest among us, but are quite willing to put off crucial health-care for those in need.

This needs to be spread far and wide. All those average folks who need the help might finally start realizing that these bozos have NOTHING for them, and no real interest in them.

Now, while the total incompetence of this gang is finally becoming apparent to a whole bunch of Bush supporters, now is the time to push the message home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, I'm sure Dems are scratching and clawing each other.......
to be the first to "slam these guys". I've seen no one step forward yet to champion the execution of the Republican party. A few speeches and statements here and there, but nobody who is willing to stick their neck out far enough to perhaps get it chopped off for slamming these jerks. We need someone with balls (or ovaries, as the case may be) to step forward and say "I'm the one that's going to hold them accountable". Until then, zzzzzzzzzzzzz :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. I know
I'm frustrated, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. But don't drop the tax cuts for the rich, right Trent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Here is the FACT about the drug benefit for seniors, by month
Lott is right on this one. He also wants the govt to negotiate the prices of prescription drugs like other countries do, like the Veterans administration does.

Please look at how the "prescription benefit" rolls out in real life, I know because I investigated it thoroughly:

There is a deductible and a monthly premium. The mo premium is $35.

I wrote Congressman Richard Burr to ask him what my Mother's monthly out of pockets would be with the 2006 benefit, based on her medicines costing $600.00 a month, every month. It took his office 6 weeks to figure it out.

With a monthly cost of medicines of $600.00:

Figures include the $35 monthly premium for "prescription insurance"

Month Amount$ that patients out of pocket will be:

Jan $355
Feb $155
Mar $155
April $470
May $635
Jun $635
July $635
Aug $635
Sept $135
Oct $35
Nov $35
Dec $35

That patient will probably die or be hospitalized in the month of April. Then, when they die, the republicans can spend that person's social security check on another war/Halliburton.

It is cheaper but a bit hard to buy from Canada but you have to buy a 3 month supply, and then you have to order 3-4 weeks ahead.)
Most seniors don't have extra money in their budget ever.

The medicare modernization act also throws some elderly off of the medicaid prescription plan, meaning that they won't be able to afford meds at all.

The medicare modernization bill is the worst most disgusting rip-off I have seen in the past 4 years Besides all of the other rip-offs.

This is one of the few times that Lott is right.

The "medicare modernization act" takes away from the seniors and lines the pockets of pharmaceutical companies. The pharma companies helped draw it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Since the money's so tight, let's take back the Senate health care plan
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 07:27 AM by Talismom
and make Lott and his buddies--who can afford it--pay for their own health care out of pocket! I'm sure they wouldn't object to making such a reasonable sacrifice for their country!

:sarcasm: --effing bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree on that one
Our weakest, oldest and poorest should have the same benefits as these SOBs. Then, can you imagine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Scrap Lott....pay for Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Scrap the War....
....don't make the Tax cuts permanent, leave the Estate Tax in place and cut the Pork - there is a good portion of the money for NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. please get the facts about the medicare drug plan
see my previous post, for a real life account.

THERE IS NO BENEFIT FOR SENIORS ON THIS ONE.

There is no regular monthly benefit.
There are

*monthly premiums
*out of pocket deductibles
*limits for govt to spend then you hit the donut hole
complicated math - something even the congressman's office had trouble with, imagine a sick elderly person doing this
*some months NO benefit at all, but still have premium to pay

If the congress really wanted to help the elderly, a 40% discount would be equal to the annualized saving that the medicare modernization act provides.

That still would be shamefully small, IMHO, as someone whose mother spends thousands a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, that's the ticket, Trent. Cut a program designed to benefit
poor elderly people who can't afford their medications.

This prescription drug program may be far from perfect, but its the whole idea that the repubs would immediately look to cutting a program like this first that hacks me off. They should be looking at shelving the estate tax bill, rescinding those tax breaks for the wealthy and going after the barrels of pork in the budget first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. medicare program is COMPLETELY USELESS
Please read my other posts, I have the facts.

Don't defend a completely deadly poisonous program just because
a republican suggested cutting it.

Oh well, go ahead and defend the medicare modernization act,
the pharmaceutical companies will be greatly pleased, as will the republican administration, whose goal is to reduce the number of elderly receiving a social security check.

Learn about the "benefit" and see why most seniors who are able to handle their own affairs are shunning it.

It is not a benefit.

It is a pretend discount, and some months you don't get anything.

Seniors can't pay 100% some months, and have a benefit others.
They don't have enough money in the first place, so how do they pay for their meds during the donut hole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I understand what you're saying. My point is that its very telling that
instead of looking at other ways to trim the budget to pay for Katrina reconstruction (like the estate tax and tax cuts for the wealthy) they immediately zero in on a program designed to help the poor. That's what I'm hacked off about. I'm not saying the plan is acceptable to start with, but it shows where the priorities are.

If they scrub this prescription drug plan now do you think they will revise it or drop the idea altogether?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
46. a republican program designed to help seniors?
yeh, just like all of those other federal programs designed
by republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoZbean Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. The Medicare D Prescription Plan Sucked
and wouldn't benefit the average senior or disabled person. My parents are the perfect example. They'd pay way more than they'd benefit. I'm in a business where I have to know these things. I've advised everyone I know who doesn't have much income to not take it, however, they get them on that too. For every month they're eligible and don't take it, if at some point in the future they should choose, they pay a 1% premium penalty for each month they could have taken it but didn't. It's not so simple as I just made it, but trust me, for the average Senior, it sucked the big one.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Cut the pork, rethink the Medicare D plan. Fire Bush and the entire Republican party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. It takes a dam* spread sheet to figure out the benefit
I guess some folks were taken in by the title:

Medicare modernization act

prescription benefit (for drug companies, keeps their prices high, bans importation, has months of no benefit at all, seniors can't budget for it, is a discount, not a co-pay plan, bans the govt from negotiating the drug prices, was written by pharma companies)

Is like anything created by the republican majority -

Leave no child behind (so govt can recruit them)
Operation Iraqi Freedom ( yeh their souls from their bodies)
Patriot Act (read Orwell)
Homeland Security Dept (Heil Hitler)
Social Security privatization - Condie will like this, she is on the BOD of Schwaab investments



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. No skin off their nose. They were thinking of cutting it anyway, because
it's a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. medicare presc drug card confuses seniors, offers no real savings
Medicare Prescription Drug Card Plan Confuses Seniors, Offers No Real Savings for Many Being Pressured to Enroll
Monday September 12, 3:19 pm ET


WINNIPEG, Manitoba, Sept. 12 /PRNewswire/ -- A study conducted by http://www.UniversalDrugStore.com, a leading mail order pharmacy operating in Canada, reveals that contrary to claims of savings for seniors enrolled in the Medicare Prescription Drug Card Plan D, the mandatory plan will in most cases actually cost seniors more than if they choose to fill their prescriptions utilizing savings available from a licensed, registered Canadian pharmacy. The Canadian option over the past 5 years has saved Americans in need of affordable prescription drug coverage an average of 42%.

"Seniors are being deluged with information about different plans, each claiming to be superior to that of a competitor. It would probably take months for any individual to properly study and choose a plan that is best for them. Even after making their decision, many individuals do not realize they are locked in but the plan they have chosen can change at any time. This can mean increased premiums, increased co-pays, reduced drug coverage and myriad stipulations that may greatly reduce the benefits," he explains

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050912/nym247.html?.v=9

This evaluation of the "benefit" is accurate, I have done my own study.

Please do not defend a federal program that was designed to hurt seniors, not to help them. It has a nice title, but it is
NO BENEFIT.

Let the congressmen have that benefit, if it is so good.
At least they have the staff to do the mathmatical calcuations to figure out how much they will pay each different month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. self delete
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 07:31 AM by genieroze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. What about a Clinton style tax increase
anybody out there thinking we need to make the top 1% start paying more and rescind the Bush tax cuts of 2001??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Timing is perfect
for another wholesale gasoline tax. Oil companies are gouging consumers already, might as well siphon a little off for the federal budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. "prescription drug plan is the first step in destroying Medicare..."
This prescription drug plan is the first step in destroying Medicare as we know it. In the long run, it doesn’t benefit seniors at all; it does just the opposite: It undercuts the basic value of Medicare.

There’s no cost-containment at all. Pharmaceuticals on the stock market went up right away because the only people who’ll benefit from this plan are the drug companies. That’s who paid for the ads we've seen in support of this plan

http://www.house.gov/murtha/health/rx-reax.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. medicare is so messed up.
My family member just had a major joint replaced and the hospital kicked her out the next day. She has no inpatient or outpatient therapy. Thanks to medicare, she will probably lose that joint and all the money and pain will be for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Medicare messed up ... or Social Security?
Medicare recently stopped paying some medical bills that I recently had because Social Security told them that I was DEAD.

I had to personally take myself to the local SS office and prove to them that I was still alive and kicking!

But the problems that this little "mistake" has caused, are multiplying exponentially.

I have absolutely no interest in signing up for the "prescription drug plan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
42. Both.
:) I am glad to hear that you are still alive and kicking! We need all the voices to speak up about these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Medicare threw my father out of the hospital after he had a stroke
"Go to a nursing home, or something", the clerk said. He was back in hospital in five days. He died in three weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. I am really sorry to hear that.
It is seeming more and more like they are killing off the older generation. We have to win in 2006 and 2008 to stop this murder. I just hope it is not too late for so many people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #41
50. It was 5 years ago
At the time, our family was lost in the bureaucratic swirl of the doctors, hospital, insurance, and government. Years later, I realized what really had happened. I still don't know what I could have done differently, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
27. It is always about screwing the the people that need help the
most. Doesn't Trent understand that those victims of the hurricane are gonna need all the help they can get. Why screw the seniors? Dump the war, and borrow from Halliburton & the Carlyle Group they have all our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. how does this screw the seniors - this is NOT a benefit
Please bone up on the facts - most seniors don't even understand the
so-called drug benefit.

It doesn't help seniors, and it was drawn up by the drug companies themselves.

Do people bother to understand an issue before rendering a judgement on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. I understand the issue very clearly. I am a senior and have a
prescription card from this program, which they have been issuing for the last year, and have been getting my meds at next to nothing.

I think you should do a little research.


Get a fucking grip on things!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. will LOTT'S rebuilding of HIS WATERFRONT PROPERTY in MISSISSIPPI come from
our tax dollars--the ones that he wants to steal from our elderly and their prescription drugs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
44. did you think that the prescription "benefit" was for the seniors
or did you read up on it and find out it only benefits the drug
companies, and seniors still can't afford their meds, in fact meds will cost more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. i thought the Rx benefit was for the seniors. How silly of me to think
that way. I should've known better ... thus,now that you point this out to me, i think the seniors will get screwed even more if the drug companies don't get their benefit and TRENT LOTT, HALEY BARBOUR, and all that crap uses it to rebuild their waterfront HOMES so Bush can park his ass on them.

(sorry for my foul language--bush stepped on my last never a long time ago)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
33. Scrap F22 fighter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queenjane Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
34. I can't believe I have to agree with Lott on this
This "benefit" is a giveaway to Bush's big pharma friends. My mother, 77, has been getting deeply discounted prices on drugs through the cards from the individual pharmas. These cards, with one exception, had no enrollment fee. Now these same companies have sent her terse letters announcing that once the Medicare drug "benefit" goes on-line, these cards are null and void. I can't really decipher the various plans, but we did figure that, with her current medications, it would cost her more to pay the premiums and co-pays than to buy her own drugs outright. HOWEVER, seniors are being blackmailed into signing up--if you don't enroll in the initial period, and decide to enroll later, you'll pay a late penalty for the rest of your life. So, she's enrolling in case she needs more prescriptions later.

If the Dems had any cajones, they'd take advantage of this opportunity to retool the benefit. I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #34
65. I would agree wholeheartedly, but......
now that some states (Missouri, Tennessee, etc) have cut out Medicaid pharmaceutical coverage, Medicare D is actually the safety net for elderly and people with disabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
36. Hey wait, what about the trickle down theory? (rant warning)
Didn't Saint Ronnie of Reagan prove that supply side economics work? We were supposed to be rolling in prosperity now, right? The treasury is stuffed with surpluses, since all those tax cuts for rich people have increased revenues dramatically, because everyone has benefited from the crumbs falling off the tables of the wealthy elite! No? Well, I know how to fix that. More tax cuts for rich people and corporations! Yessir, and if that doesn't work we'll just keep doing it over and over until it works.

This would have all worked out great by now, but it's Clinton's fault.

:rant: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yeah! Trent's house blew down...poor thing
he needs a new one soon. And anyway, he has great health care...we pay for it.
What a sorry sack of shit. End the War. Bring the troops home
IMPEACH BUSH AND SEND THEM ALL TO THE HAGUE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
38. does trent ever get sick of deciding who lives and who dies?
screw trent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. screw Trent, how dare he take money away from pharmaceutical companies
you are so right - screw Trent Lott, those pharmaceutical companies really need all of that money.

Far be it that this phony benefit that makes medicines cost more be repealed.


The Bush Co did a great job- even democrats are fooled into thinking that Bush wants to help seniors with this phony drug benefit.

Keep the prescription drug benefit, that way there will be less senior citizens around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
39. Jackpine: Scrap Lott, scrap tax breaks, scrap Iraq, institute nat'l health
care.

Works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
40. Even here
There seems to be a LOT of confusion. There are essentially 3 different programs.

1) First program was the Medicare Approved Discount Card which ends Dec 31. It was a marginal benefit for many seniors; however, if the seniors made under 40K/yr, and you selected the right card, with a little finagling you could get your drugs for a $5-$40 copay, which would be an excellent benefit.

2) The Medicare Part D, which starts Jan 1. This is an insurance policy which depending on available plans, is based on a deductible, coinsurance, donut, then a stop-loss for extreme spending. It will cost $35/month, and like Medicare Part B will have an actuarilly computed penalty if you enroll past the open enrollment date and can't prove prior coverage. The premium is about $400/yr.

3) For low income seniors, those who have income less than the poverty level, as well as have little to no assets other than a house and inexpensive vehicle, this will be a different plan. It will not have a premium, and it will pay 95% of all drug purchases with no coinsurance, deductible, or donut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. yeh, for low income seniors who would have been on medicaid
for low income seniors who would have been on medicaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. Not neccissarily
Although somewhat true what you said, it is not the case all over the country.

Many states do not provide, or provide very limited perscription drug benefits to seniors outside of a nursing home. For these seniors, this could be a godsend. Remember, under Medicaid drug coverage is an optional coverage. Many states provide 3 scripts a year, others limit it to 2 a month.

The qualification benefits are also much more liberal than those for Medicaid in many states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
43. Here's how were gonna pay for EVERYTHING:
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 10:59 AM by Raster
1) No new tax cuts. Period.
2) Re-evaluate income taxes. Institute a more progressive tax. Make the highest tax bracket 59%, and no loopholes. I don't give a damn how many tax attorneys you have, you pay 100% of your fair share. If you're going to fancy yourself a robber baron, then you'll damned well be taxed like one.
3) Re-visit the estate tax. Take it back to 20-yr ago amounts. F*** paris hilton and f*** the walmart heirs. Big dynastic fortunes breed people like, well, paris and the walmart heirs. 'nuf said.
4) FULLY tax Social Security Income. Remove the $90,000 cap. If you make $20 million in one year, you pay Social Security on the FULL $20 million.
5) Throw that piece of shit Medicare bill to the dogs where it belongs. Immediately the government will negotiate (just like most other civilized countries where the government is in the health care business) prices on all pharmaceuticals and other components of healthcare. Why should the U.S. government pay premium while everyone else gets to go bargain basement?
6) Institute an energy windfall profits tax. If the fucking oil companies are going to price gouge, penalize the snot out of them. Speaking of the oil companies...
7) Nationalize the energy infrastructure in this country. Since big oil already owns the government, it's only fair the people own big oil.
8) Resist further deregulation and privatization. Look at the enron. Look at the airline industry. All deregulation and privatization do is make a VERY SMALL portion of the population rich.
9) Put the new bankruptcy bill right where it belongs, up the ass of MBNA. Indentured servitude went out 150 yrs ago.
10) Once again, taxes. All companies doing business in the United States will pay their fair share of taxes. No more Cayman Islands tax dodges. If the big corporations in this country paid their fair share, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now. Big corporate has bamboozled American business into thinking the best interests of big corporate are the best interests of American business. Couldn't be further from the truth. Big corporations are lousy citizens. And speaking of...
11) Reexamine basic corporate law in this country. Corporations are not persons. People are persons. Corporations are entities that exist to enrich themselves at the expense of everything else. Corporations don't give a shit if the air and water are clean. They don't breathe or drink. Corporations are like viruses: viruses exist to replicate themselves; corporations exist to enrich themselves. Remove the "person-hood" status for corporations.

on edit:
12) Outlaw all lobbying of government officials. Give lobbyists 24 hours to vacate D.C., then put a price on their heads and shoot them on site. They're a huge problem with American government. The cash corrupts everyone it touches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polethebear Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
73. I'm gonna bust him off an email......
not that will do any good. But at least I can vent.My dad and I are on medicare. It's the only the way dad can pay for his meds.


Wanna see it when I'm done???


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
49. thus admitting the program is a failure not worth backing
thak goodness. Can we do something sensible like expand Medicare a tiny bit instead? I'm so tired of these lackluster pukkke morons showboating all their dazzling ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. Scrap the B-1 bomber, Star Wars/SDI, half the high tech CIA satellites
All that military-industrial pork. Add Senator Stevens' useless Alaskan bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
52. "Yeah, ya know,
if we let more people die off we won't have to pay for them anymore."

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. Lott saying something semi-sane????
Well, shiver me timbers, matey. That conjob of a giveaway to the drug industry should never have passed in the first place. By "too far along" the Smirking Moron means that his buddies have already accounted for their windfall profits and to cancel the program would turn zillionaires into very disappointed multi-billionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
59. Yeah... let the old people die... so Trent can sit on that new porch....n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius 2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
60. GRRR!! How 'bout we roll back the tax cuts for the high wage earners,say
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 08:42 PM by ignatius 2
250,000 and above,cut back the billions in tax breaks to big oil and other corporations and get the hell out of Iraq instead of putting the burden on other poor and elderly Americans.

Have the repugs no shame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
62. let's cut the outlandish benefits and salaries of Congress first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncertainty1999 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
63. It sounds like Lott has BUYER'S REMORSE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
64. Lott is right here... this program is a disaster waiting to happen
Kill the windfall for the insurance industry before it happens.

We have to do something...

ie. also roll back the taxcuts and get out of Iraq too.

Then, we can talk about a REAL prescription drug benefit.

I STRONGLY doubt that Lott would agree with that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
66. Wow - that got them re-elected. Man they are aggressive. Wonder
what exactly they are trying to do? Play the Dems off the elderly when they hold the "estate tax" card?

Rita hasn't even washed a speck of salt up on Texas and still they see the pay-offs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
67. when did the costs escalate to $700 billion?
I thought bushites in HHS swore to congress that the costs would be below $400 b and then just after passage acknowledged it was going to be closer to $550 (don't recall exact #s) - but haven't read $700 - either I missed a news item - or Lott just let a bushco "secret from the public" out of the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreegone Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
68. In other words
Screw the elderly and pay Halliburton. More freakin' corporate welfare.

GET CORPORATIONS OFF WELFARE:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
70. Krugman is proven correct once again
At this point, the only line items large enough on the social side of the discretionary federal budget are benefit programs for the elderly and disabled. The only way to make the numbers add up without raising taxes is to slash them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
71. The so-called "Senior drug bill" was a hoax from the get-go
The roll-out was just more plastic "discount" cards that most pharmacies and infomercial people already offered.. the lead-time was sufficient for the pharma companies to raise prices for common drugs by up top 40%..then the few seniors who did take the temporary cards got a 10-25% discount on drugs whose prices jumped 40%?? Such a deal!

and in the initial phase of the bill the pharma companies GOT cash money (for 'studying and implementing the system)..

truth-be-told, the reason the start up was pushed back to '06, was to get votes in '04 and stall long enough so the eventual benefits could be watered down or eliminated altogether..

It's working juts the way they planned:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
72. Scrap Lott, Pay for Real Senator n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
74. So we can rebuild his house and
bush can sit on his Fucking new porch?

Built on the backs of poor people who need those prescription drugs..is that what this insensitive fucker is saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polethebear Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
75. My email to the seantor
Hi Seantor,

I can remember you from when I actually lived on the coast twenty years ago.I always knew you were colorful and spoke your mind and had your own opinions. But cutting medicare?????


Nope,sorry sir

Try again.....

How about hitting our wonderful gas companies up for the money??? Better yet,the saudis orrrrrrr that guy in the white house.

You know,I figured your house was more important than the pepole on the coast or frankly the country,but this takes the cake.

Me Personally,you ask? I could live,I have other ways of paying for my pills. But I worry for pepole like my dad who is disabled and doesn't. Maybe he could come live with you and you could look after him. He could help you with your house. He's an ex-marine and we all know you love our vets,being the wonderful patriot you are....or claim to be.

Sincerely,

Michael Lawson


PS-Seantor,when even our president can put two and two together and realize this a stupid idea,you know you've screwed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
76. spoken like a true selfish moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
77. Lott's choice
First thing that popped into my head, that movie, Sophie's Choice. Yep it's either give those poor people a place to live or let grandma become unable to pay for her drugs and die.

You decide, America.

Choices America. You pay for your fear one way or another. You elect idiots and evil greedy bastards and think you can be just as rich as them..well you have to be just as evil too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC