Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Coca Cola Employees in Venezuela Announce Possible Occupation of Pl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:18 PM
Original message
Former Coca Cola Employees in Venezuela Announce Possible Occupation of Pl
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:19 PM by Judi Lynn
Former Coca Cola Employees in Venezuela Announce Possible Occupation of Plant

The Associated Press

Published: Oct 9, 2005

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - Former Coca-Cola Co. employees in Venezuela are threatening to occupy a local facility to demand severance pay, the state-run news agency reported.

Jose Chirinos, a lawmaker from central Carabobo state who spoke to the ABN media outlet on behalf of the former workers late Saturday, said that an assembly of roughly 4,000 former employees would consider the proposal at an Oct. 29 meeting. He did not say when or why the workers were laid off.

"Through a trick ... (the company) hasn't paid thousands of workers what they are owed," Chirinos said.

Company representatives could not be reached for comment.

The U.S.-based company owns four bottling units and 34 distribution centers in Venezuela. Chirinos said ex-employees will consider occupying company facilities in Valencia, an industrial city located roughly 110 kilometers (65 miles) west of Caracas.
(snip/...)

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB9YF2HLEE.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


You no doubt remember the distinguished record of Coca Cola's occupation of Colombia, and the rare relationship it has with the people of Colombia, the workers:
Coca-Cola (Coke) to be Sued for Human Rights Abuses in Colombia

Coke Bottling Plants in Colombia Use Paramilitary Security Forces to Murder, Torture, and Kidnap Trade Union Leaders

Coke Controls All Aspects of Production and Operation of its Bottling Plants and Allows Local Managers to Engage in Systematic Human Rights Abuses

Thursday, July 19, 2001

Contact:
Terry Collingsworth
Tel: (202) 347-4100
Fax: (202) 347-4885
email: laborrights@igc.org

The United Steel Workers Union and the International Labor Rights Fund will file suit tomorrow, July 20, in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami) against Coke and Panamerican Beverages, Inc., the primary bottler of Coke products in Latin America. Additional defendants include owners of a bottling plant in Colombia where trade union leaders have been murdered. The case was initiated by SINALTRAINAL, the trade union that represents workers at the Coke facilities in Colombia. SINALTRAINAL has long maintained that Coke is among the most notorious employers in Colombia and that the company maintains open relations with murderous death squads as part of a program to intimidate trade union leaders. The union is using the filing of this case on July 20, Colombian Independence Day, to renew its campaign to highlight that Colombia holds the terrible distinction of being ranked number one in the world for the number of trade union leaders murdered each year, and that Coke plays a key role in maintaining that distinction.

Other Plaintiffs include the Estate of Isidro Segundo Gil, a trade union leader who was murdered
while working at the Coke bottling plant in Carepa, Colombia. The manager of that facility, owned by an American, Richard Kirby, who is also a defendant in this case, specifically threatened to kill the leaders of the union if they continued their union activities. He made good on the threat and ordered the murder of Mr. Gil. The other Plaintiffs are Luis Eduardo Garcia, Alvaro Gonzalez, José Domingo Flores, Jorge Humberto Leal and Juan Carlos Galvis, all leaders of SINALTRAINAL, and, while employed by Coke, were subjected to torture, kidnapping, and/or unlawful detention in order to encourage them to cease their trade union activities. These Plaintiffs allege that Coke employees either ordered the violence directly, or delegated the job to paramilitary death squads that were acting as agents for Coke.

"This case is extremely important for trade union and human rights. If we cannot get Coke, one of the most well known companies in the world, to protect the lives and human rights of the workers at its world-wide bottling facilities, then we certainly have a long way to go in making the global economy safe for trade unionists, " said Daniel Kovalik, Assistant General Counsel of the Steelworkers and co-counsel for the Plaintiffs. "While the offenses detailed in the Complaint occurred in an industry outside the Steelworkers' core jurisdiction, we are filing this case to show our solidarity with the embattled trade unions of Colombia. We absolutely must stand up together to stop such criminal activity against our union brothers and sisters regardless of where or in what industry it occurs." he added.

"The case is very strong from a legal perspective," said Terry Collingsworth, general counsel of the
DC-based International Labor Rights Fund, who is co-counsel for the Plaintiffs, and who has brought similar cases against Exxon Mobil and Unocal Corporation for human rights violations in Aceh, Indonesia and Burma, respectively. "There is no question that Coke knew about and benefited from the systematic repression of trade union rights at its bottling plants in Colombia, and this case will make the company accountable," he stated.
(snip/...)
http://www.laborrights.org/press/coke071901.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Looks like the workers in Venezuela are lucky Coca Cola hasn't had any of them killed, yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. When a corporation acts like an ass, it is time for eminent domain and
selling the plant to the state for whatever it is worth as scrape.

And then putting the workers back to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You're right.
We're seeing this more and more, like in India for example.

And of course, Hugo Chavez is helping these people. He's seizing some factories, and he just slapped a huge surtax on the US oil companies that are pumping out oil in the Orinoco belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. The poison gas is being mixed even as we speak.
They are waiting for Kissinger to arrive
before they start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. coke = murder, coke = cia
because of the nearly worldwide reach of coca-cola, cia agents are often placed in their (coc-cola's) foreign offices, using their company positition as cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This sounds so likely. It's fiendishly ugly, but completely credible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. I'd like to hear more about that please
I know the Red Cross has been used by spook types in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Could we support or back them by boycotting Coke here?
Perhaps by writing Coke here in the U.S. and letting them know that they'll be boycotted unless or until they cease engaging in criminal activities....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Sounds good to me since coke
ruins you teeth and your health..I gave it up years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. university activism
Students campaign to eliminate Coke

Student Council members recently passed a resolution supporting the student-run Kick Coke campaign. The resolution backs the group’s efforts to decrease the consumption of Coca-Cola on campus, and it also stipulates that President Al Bloom will write to Coca-Cola executives expressing Swarthmore’s disapproval of reported human rights violations by the corporation.

The resolution represents a victory for the campaign, whose members have been trying to alert Swarthmore students to the charges of human rights abuses levied against Coke factories in India and Colombia. While the Kick Coke campaign has existed at the international level for some time, Swarthmore students have begun to rally behind the cause over the past year.

Sarah Roberts ’08 was moved to work on Swarthmore’s Kick Coke campaign after learning about some of the company’s policies. “I went to a conference in Austin, Texas, and some union leaders from Colombia spoke at it. They talked about the murders and kidnappings that were occurring, as well as the intimidation present at Coke factories,” Roberts said. “There were also some water rights issues in India. I think it’s important to use our money for social justice, not to do bad things in the world.”

Sarah Roberts ’08 was moved to work on Swarthmore’s Kick Coke campaign after learning about some of the company’s policies. “I went to a conference in Austin, Texas, and some union leaders from Colombia spoke at it. They talked about the murders and kidnappings that were occurring, as well as the intimidation present at Coke factories,” Roberts said. “There were also some water rights issues in India. I think it’s important to use our money for social justice, not to do bad things in the world.”

Ruth Schultz ’09’s disgust with Coca-Cola executives for alleged human rights violations has motivated her to participate in the campaign. “In Colombia, over the past 13 years or so, there have been nine murders of labor leaders, and there have also been various threats against them. One person was even killed in a Coke plant in broad daylight,” she said. “It’s expected that Coke is connected with this, since they most likely contract paramilitary groups to quell labor unions. If a worker gets killed in their factory, that’s horrible, if they were planning it or if they weren’t.”

http://phoenix.swarthmore.edu/2005-10-06/news/15437


‘U’ reviews Coca-Cola proposal for third-party audit

The University is reviewing The Coca-Cola Company’s proposal for a third-party audit of its operations in Colombia and India, where the University and a coalition of students allege the soft drink vendor has committed human rights violations.

The University received the proposal late on Friday — which was the deadline for Coca-Cola to agree to an independent audit or potentially have its contract with the University cut. In June, the University’s Dispute Review Board set the deadline when it was reviewing the alleged human rights abuses.

Peggy Norgren, the University’s associate vice president of finance, said she and Chief Financial Officer Timothy Slottow will make a recommendation to University President Mary Sue Coleman on what action to take regarding the University’s contract with Coca-Cola within the next few days. Though Norgren and Slottow can consult the Dispute Review Board, the ultimate decision on what course of action to recommend rests with them. Norgren left open the possibility that they could recommend that the University sever its ties with Coca-Cola if they find the company’s proposal inadequate.

The Dispute Review Board, finding some of the accusations against Coca-Cola to be credible, recommended on June 18 that the University review its 12 contracts with the company — which total $1.3 million — by deadlines set by the board. The outcome of reviews depends on whether Coca-Cola meets conditions set by the board.

http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/10/03/4340c782a84ac

Students urged to kick Coke habit
(Ryerson University, Toronto)

RSU held a public forum Monday on the alleged crimes of Coca-Cola in Colombia to encourage students to campaign against a campus-wide "preferred agreement" signed by Ryerson.


The allegations in the "Killer Coke" campaign involve "horrific human rights abuses" where Coke bottling companies have allegedly contracted paramilitary groups to threaten, intimidate and even murder employees attempting to unionize and bargain collectively.


Coke employee Luis Eduardo Garcia, who faced intimidation and imprisonment as member of the SINALTRAINAL Union in Columbia, spoke to about 80 students and faculty with the help of translator Paulina Vivanco.


"Only you will be able to stop the human rights abuses by Coke," he urged. As a union member, he was labelled a "terrorist" and jailed for six months.

http://www.theeyeopener.com/storydetail.cfm?storyid=2136



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Kudos to these colleges/students!
How wonderful to hear of students' passions running high on human rights issues. I was hooked on Coca-Cola for decades.
I kicked it about a year ago when the symptoms of a really bad flu bout were even worse than the withdrawal symptoms you get when you stop drinking Coke. It really is addictive. I sometimes wonder what they may add to it - just like the tobacco companies developed more quickly addictive cigarettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You beat the habit! Congratulations.
It really isn't as easy as you'd think!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftistGorilla Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. I go to Ryerson...
It becoming a big deal there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Columbian Coca-Cola
M question is about the article you show from Coca-Cola's actions in Columbia. The article was from July 19, 2001, more than 4 years ago, and was about a lawsuit that was being filed "July 20, in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami)". What was the result of the allegations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Haven't found it yet. It may be appropriate to point out I used this case
as an illustration of the kind of heavy-handed "intimidation" the company has been handing out outside the country for years. I was not attempting to say look at this case alone: it's like staring at a finger when someone is pointing at something else.

Here's a copy of the complaint, and I'll keep looking to see if I can run down the verdict. I'm no legal expert so it could take a while:
COMPLAINT

I. INTRODUCTION

1. This case involves the systematic intimidation, kidnapping, detention and murder of trade unionists in Colombia, South America at the hands of paramilitaries working as agents of corporations doing business in that country. The violent persecution of trade unionists in Colombia has been at epidemic proportions for many years. Since 1986 when the Central Unitaria de Trabajadores de Colombia ("CUT"), the largest trade union confederation in Colombia, was formed, over 3,800 trade unionists have been murdered. Presently, of every five (5) trade unionists murdered in the world, over 3 are Colombian. This case, brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act, RICO and state tort law, is brought to remedy and prevent the violent persecution of trade unionists at various locations of one particular company doing business in Colombia -- Coca Cola. This campaign of terror against trade unionists in Colombia and at Coca Cola in particular is ongoing. For example, on June 21, 2001, at a Coca-Cola bottling plant in Monertia, in the Cordoba Province of Colombia, Oscar Dario Soto Polo an employee at this operation, and a member of the Executive Committee of the CUT, was gunned down in the street as he was accompanying his youngest daughter to her house. Sen. Oscar Soto was engaged in negotiations with Coca Cola at the time over union proposals to provide security to trade unionists under threat.

II. NATURE OF THE ACTION

2. Plaintiff SINALTRAINAL is a Colombian trade union and a member of the CUT. SINALTRAINAL represents workers at a number of beverage and food companies in Colombia, including several Coca-Cola bottling plants throughout Colombia. SINALTRAINAL (hereinafter referred to as the "Union") has been decimated by the intimidation, kidnap, detention, torture and assassination of numerous of its leaders by paramilitary forces working as agents of corporate concerns, including Defendants, in Colombia. Plaintiff Union brings this Complaint for equitable relief and damages to remedy the injury to itself caused by the wrongful conduct of the Defendants Coca-Cola Company (hereinafter referred to as "Coke"); Coca-Cola de Colombia, S.A. (hereinafter referred to as "Coke Colombia"); Panamerican Beverages, Inc., Panamco, LLC (collectively referred to herein as "Panamco"); Panamco Industrial de Gaseosas, S.A. a/k/a Panamco Colombia, S.A. (hereinafter referred to as "Panamco Colombia"); Richard I. Kirby, Richard Kirby Keilland and Bebidas y Alimentos de Uraba, S.A. (hereinafter referred to as "Bebidas y Alimentos").

3. Plaintiff Estate of Isidro Segundo Gil ("Plaintiff Estate") represents the estate of Isidro Segundo Gil who was murdered by paramilitary forces inside the Carepa plant of Defendant Bebidas y Alimentos. Plaintiff Estate brings this Complaint against Defendants Coke, Coke Colombia, Bebidas y Alimentos, Richard I. Kirby and Richard Kirby Keilland for damages to remedy the wrongful death of Isidro Segundo Gil which was proximately caused by the wrongful conduct of these Defendants.

4. Plaintiffs Luis Eduardo Garcia, Alvaro Gonzalez, José Domingo Flores, Jorge Humberto Leal and Juan Carlos Galvis bring this Complaint against Defendants Coke, Coke Colombia, Panamco and Panamco Colombia for equitable relief and for damages to remedy the injury to their persons caused by the wrongful conduct of these Defendants.
(snip/...)
http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Coca-Cola-Human-Rights20jul01.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I haven't seen the disposition, yet, but have more info. on THE CRIME
Isidro Segundo Gil, an employee at a Coca-Cola bottling plant in Colombia, was killed at his workplace by paramilitary thugs. His children, now living in hiding with relatives, understand all too well why their homeland is known as "a country where union work is like carrying a tombstone on your back."

A chilling description of Gil's assassination, based on eyewitness accounts, is the centerpiece of a lawsuit filed in Miami in July 2001 against Coca-Cola, Panamerican Beverages (the largest soft drink bottler in Latin America) and Bebidas y Alimentos (a bottler owned by Richard Kirby of Key Biscayne, Fla., which operates the plant in which Gil was killed.

In the lawsuit, Gil's union, Sinaltrainal, the International Labor Rights Fund (ILRF) and the United Steelworkers of America assert that the Coke bottlers "contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that utilized extreme violence and murdered, tortured, unlawfully detained or otherwise silenced trade union leaders."

Minutes after the thugs showed up at the Carepa plant gate, they fired 10 shots at Gil, a member of the union executive board, mortally wounding him. An hour later, another union leader was kidnapped at his home. That evening, a building that housed the union's offices, equipment and records was set ablaze.

The next day, a heavily armed group returned to the plant, called the workers together and told them if they didn't quit the union by 4 p.m., they, too, would be killed. Resignation forms were prepared in advance by Coca-Cola's plant manager, who had a history of socializing with the paramilitaries and had earlier "given (them) an order to carry out the task of destroying the union," the lawsuit says.

Fearing for their lives, union members at Carepa resigned en masse and fled the area. The company broke off contract negotiations, the paramilitaries camped outside the plant gate for the next two months, and the union was crushed. Experienced workers who made about $380 a month were replaced by new hires earning minimum wage ($130 a month).
(snip/...)
http://www.killercoke.org/crimes-isidro.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
27.  President of SINALTRAINAL Assassinated
<clips>

It is with much pain we inform you that our comrade LUCIANO ENRIQUE ROMERO MOLINA, President of SINALTRAINAL, has been assassinated. He was last seen by a family member at about 9:00 PM driving a Spring taxi with plates VP 473 on September 10th in the city of Valledupar. He was later found tied with about 40 stab wounds and signs of torture.

Luciano Romero who was 45 years old and is survived by 4 children and his partner, worked in the Ciclac-Nestle factory in the city of Valledupar where he was fired on October 22, 2002 due to an allegation that he engaged in an illegal strike which was really a protest meeting.

Our comrade Luciano had been threatened with death which is why on various occasions he had left Valledupar for his own protection and was once in Gijon, Spain in a program of protection and solidarity. He was the union’s delegate to the Political Prisoners Solidarity Committee in which he carried out solidarity and humanitarian activities for the detainees.

We repudiate this horrendous crime, which is part of the interminable list of assassinated Colombian union leaders with in the strategy of State Terrorism and the persecution of carried out by corporations in order to exterminate the labor movement. We condemn the government of Alvaro Uribe Velez and its deceptive Peace dialog with paramilitary groups that continues to massacre the defenseless population and under the law of Justice and Peace they will be recognized as legal by the state which is nothing more that a pardon.

Send protest letters to:
Álvaro Uribe Vélez
Presidente de la República de Colombia
Carrera 8 No 7 -26 Palacio de Nariño,
Bogotá D. C.,
Colombia, South America

Telefax: (57) 1 5662071, E-mail: auribe@presidencia.gov.co

http://laborrights.org/press/luciano_assassination_091005.htm





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. This might help...
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 06:59 PM by Say_What
<clips>

....Denial No. 2: Coca-Cola claims that "the U.S. District Court in Miami dismissed The Coca-Cola Company from lawsuits filed by SINALTRAINAL, finding that the plaintiffs failed to offer any factual or legal basis to support their claims that the Company was responsible for wrongful conduct in Colombia."

The Truth: While the Florida District Court did on 31 March 2003 dismiss Coca-Cola from the lawsuit, it did so (1) prior to discovery and the accompanying ability of both sides to garner and present evidence; and (2) on the basis of a single document — a "sample" bottlers' agreement that Coca-Cola admitted wasn't the actual agreement with the Colombian bottlers cited in the lawsuit.

The court found, we believe prematurely and in error, that Coca-Cola did not have sufficient control of the Colombian bottlers to be held liable for their human rights abuses — in spite of the fact that Coca-Cola was the largest shareholder in Panamco and owned 25% of its outstanding Class A shares, 25% of its Class B shares and 100% of its outstanding Series C Preferred Stock. Panamco's "Definitive Proxy Statement" on its merger with Mexican-based Coca-Cola FEMSA, filed on 28 March 2003, stated: "The Coca-Cola Company has the right to prevent any merger transaction involving Panamco, by virtue of its ownership of Panamco's Series C Preferred Stock…" Six top executives and a former consultant at Coca-Cola, a Coca-Cola board member and a chief policymaker for SunTrust Banks (Coca-Cola's financial bulwark since 1919) now sit on FEMSA's board, and Coca-Cola owns 46.4% of FEMSA's voting stock.

The District Court also failed to take into account documents admittedly created by Coca-Cola (i.e., letters to consumers and a statement to shareholders) in which the company frankly acknowledged its control over workplace practices and its right to inspect the plants to ensure that local managers abide by human rights conventions and domestic law.

The plaintiffs intend to appeal the dismissal of the company. However, the court's technical ruling on Coca-Cola's ability to be liable for human rights abuses in Colombia does not change the fact that these abuses actually occurred. Indeed, the plaintiffs continue to pursue these claims. Coca-Cola chooses to ignore the fact that the court did allow the lawsuit to proceed against both Panamco Colombia (now merged into Coca-Cola FEMSA) and Bebidas y Alimentos, the operator of the plant in which Isidro Gil was murdered.

http://www.colombiasolidarity.org.uk/cocacolacampaign/cokevtruth.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Duh?????
I am far from being able to easily digest legalese. All I seem to read is that Coca-Cola was dismissed from the case because "plaintiffs failed to offer any factual or legal basis to support their claims that the Company was responsible for wrongful conduct in Colombia." The rest is why some people think the court was wrong.

I'd love to see some report where the company itself got nailed, rather then just the local operators!!

(unless I've read this wrong?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You asked for the results of the allegations. I posted them.
It is common knowledge that businesses in Colombia use right wing paras acts as enforcers. This has been going on for many years.

Here's an article in English, maybe this will be easier for you to get an idea of what actually happens there.

BTW, Colombia is spelled with a "o", not a "u".

<clips>

...The unions claim Coca-Cola bottlers hired far-right militias of the United Self Defence Forces of Colombia (AUC) to murder nine union members at Colombian bottling plants in the past 13 years.

Two years ago, the Colombian food and drink union Sinaltrainal sued Coca-Cola and its Colombian bottling partners in a US federal court in Miami over the deaths of its members.

The suit alleged that the bottling companies "contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that utilised extreme violence and murdered, tortured, unlawfully detained or otherwise silenced trade union leaders", and that Coca-Cola was indirectly responsible for this.

In March, the judge removed Coca-Cola from the suit, but the process against the bottlers continues. The unions have appealed against the court's decision.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1004598,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. And I appreciate it
I was hoping the Multinational Corporation was nailed rather than simply charges. I was hoping for an outcome favoing the workers, demanding payments to victims, OSERs like work protections, etc. Nothing to do with what you posted. Maybe since the courts decisions is being appealed by the union the outcome will be better -or more what I hoped for anyway.

Sorry if I left the wrong impression

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No problemo...
Welcome to DU, Traveling_Home! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Coke has a bad rep in India too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. give the employees their damned money!
I hate it when corporations act so damned arrogant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. A large Coca-Cola shareholder in Venezuela is Bush family friend,
Cuban-Venezuelan, Gustavo Cisneros. You may remember reading that during the referendum workers in Coca Cola plants stated that their factory bosses forced them to sign the referendum at work, or lose their jobs.

On Cisneros:
But, other members of the Bush family also have important ties to Venezuela. After the failed coup d'etat against Chavez, television magnate and Bush Sr. friend Gustavo Cisneros was implicated as one of the principal proponents of the coup.

Cisneros publicly denied his role in the coup, but the magazine Newsweek noted that Pedro Carmona "was seen leaving Cisneros' office" before going to the Government Palace to swear in as provisional president.

According to Newsweek, Venezuelan legislator Pedro Pablo Alcantara said that the brief Carmona dictatorship was organized in Cisneros' offices, and that Cisneros was the "supreme commander" of the operation.
(snip)

Billionaire Gustavo Cisneros Therefore, it's not strange that Cisneros has been identified as Bush Jr.'s prospect to confront Hugo Chavez in future presidential elections, which could take place earlier than scheduled if the opposition wins the US-supported presidential recall referendum.
(snip)

Of Cuban origin, Cisneros is the majority shareholder in Univision, the largest Spanish language TV chain in the United States, and he possesses channels with vast audiences in other countries, such as Venevision in Venezuela, ChileVision, Caracol Television of Colombia, and Caribbean Communications Network. He also owns the bottler Panamco, and is a major shareholder in Coca Cola.
(snip/...)
http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/venezuela/2181.html

?


A real winner....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Guerillanews.com
had a MOST INTERESTING EXPOSE on "Coke" some years ago. I just searched it and find ALL PAGES HAVE BEEN SCRUBBED.

And Bob Kolody is NOW OFFICIALLY DEAD.

http://www.raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl/noframes/read/474

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. archived links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Thank you soooooo much, chat_noir!!!
:hug::loveya::hug:

I be jes' a little 'ol lady doin' mah best to keep up, relying on memory subject to brainfarts. THANK YOU, Sweetiekins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Thanks for the info. Is this link useful?
http://www.davidicke.net/newsroom/america/usa/072801b.html

I've been in the dark about Bob Kolody. In the link it appears that even Pat Leahy (in one of the PDF links) was well aware of what's been happening here.

Thanks for pointing out important information about this company. It shows just how powerful this corporation finally has become, unfortunately.

Stopped using Coke years ago when I learned what they'd been doing to the people of Colombia. Nothing is worth the price they have had to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. YES!
Even a broken clock ;-) is correct twice a day. Thank you, JL! Corporate Coca-Cola (and others such as they) IS what your military is shedding your loved ones' blood to "protect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. What do you expect from narco-traffickers? EOM
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 02:21 PM by K-W
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Adelante! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. Isn't it weird that it takes a "Commie dictatorship"
to expose the rot of corporate corruption. I'm sort of glad in a way that the US military is bogged down in Iraq, or else they might go for Venezuela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC