Students campaign to eliminate CokeStudent Council members recently passed a resolution supporting the student-run Kick Coke campaign. The resolution backs the group’s efforts to decrease the consumption of Coca-Cola on campus, and it also stipulates that President Al Bloom will write to Coca-Cola executives expressing Swarthmore’s disapproval of reported human rights violations by the corporation.
The resolution represents a victory for the campaign, whose members have been trying to alert Swarthmore students to the charges of human rights abuses levied against Coke factories in India and Colombia. While the Kick Coke campaign has existed at the international level for some time, Swarthmore students have begun to rally behind the cause over the past year.
Sarah Roberts ’08 was moved to work on Swarthmore’s Kick Coke campaign after learning about some of the company’s policies. “I went to a conference in Austin, Texas, and some union leaders from Colombia spoke at it. They talked about the murders and kidnappings that were occurring, as well as the intimidation present at Coke factories,” Roberts said. “There were also some water rights issues in India. I think it’s important to use our money for social justice, not to do bad things in the world.”
Sarah Roberts ’08 was moved to work on Swarthmore’s Kick Coke campaign after learning about some of the company’s policies. “I went to a conference in Austin, Texas, and some union leaders from Colombia spoke at it. They talked about the murders and kidnappings that were occurring, as well as the intimidation present at Coke factories,” Roberts said. “There were also some water rights issues in India. I think it’s important to use our money for social justice, not to do bad things in the world.”
Ruth Schultz ’09’s disgust with Coca-Cola executives for alleged human rights violations has motivated her to participate in the campaign. “In Colombia, over the past 13 years or so, there have been nine murders of labor leaders, and there have also been various threats against them. One person was even killed in a Coke plant in broad daylight,” she said. “It’s expected that Coke is connected with this, since they most likely contract paramilitary groups to quell labor unions. If a worker gets killed in their factory, that’s horrible, if they were planning it or if they weren’t.”
http://phoenix.swarthmore.edu/2005-10-06/news/15437‘U’ reviews Coca-Cola proposal for third-party audit The University is reviewing The Coca-Cola Company’s proposal for a third-party audit of its operations in Colombia and India, where the University and a coalition of students allege the soft drink vendor has committed human rights violations.
The University received the proposal late on Friday — which was the deadline for Coca-Cola to agree to an independent audit or potentially have its contract with the University cut. In June, the University’s Dispute Review Board set the deadline when it was reviewing the alleged human rights abuses.
Peggy Norgren, the University’s associate vice president of finance, said she and Chief Financial Officer Timothy Slottow will make a recommendation to University President Mary Sue Coleman on what action to take regarding the University’s contract with Coca-Cola within the next few days. Though Norgren and Slottow can consult the Dispute Review Board, the ultimate decision on what course of action to recommend rests with them. Norgren left open the possibility that they could recommend that the University sever its ties with Coca-Cola if they find the company’s proposal inadequate.
The Dispute Review Board, finding some of the accusations against Coca-Cola to be credible, recommended on June 18 that the University review its 12 contracts with the company — which total $1.3 million — by deadlines set by the board. The outcome of reviews depends on whether Coca-Cola meets conditions set by the board.
http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/10/03/4340c782a84acStudents urged to kick Coke habit(Ryerson University, Toronto)
RSU held a public forum Monday on the alleged crimes of Coca-Cola in Colombia to encourage students to campaign against a campus-wide "preferred agreement" signed by Ryerson.
The allegations in the "Killer Coke" campaign involve "horrific human rights abuses" where Coke bottling companies have allegedly contracted paramilitary groups to threaten, intimidate and even murder employees attempting to unionize and bargain collectively.
Coke employee Luis Eduardo Garcia, who faced intimidation and imprisonment as member of the SINALTRAINAL Union in Columbia, spoke to about 80 students and faculty with the help of translator Paulina Vivanco.
"Only you will be able to stop the human rights abuses by Coke," he urged. As a union member, he was labelled a "terrorist" and jailed for six months.
http://www.theeyeopener.com/storydetail.cfm?storyid=2136