Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al-Sistani said to weigh pullout demand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:34 PM
Original message
Al-Sistani said to weigh pullout demand
NAJAF, Iraq - Iraq's top Shiite cleric is considering demanding a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. and foreign troops after a democratically elected government takes office next year, according to associates of the Iranian-born cleric.

He will not do it in an anti-American way, but in a pro-Iraqi way," Nasr said. Ahmed S. Hashim, a professor of strategic studies at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, R.I., said a public declaration by al-Sistani "will leave us without any legs to stand on in Iraq."

"But if we are made to withdraw prematurely, the country will plunge into civil war," said Hashim, who has visited Iraq several times since 2003.

The associates said al-Sistani's suspicion of the Americans stems in part from the deep resentment many Shiites still hold for the U.S. decision not to intervene on their behalf in the 1991 uprising against Saddam following the Gulf War that year. Saddam's forces crushed that rebellion, slaughtering tens of thousands of Shiites.

http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/breaking_news/13024286.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you and goodbye US
now we are going to deal with the Sunnis with our own methods...

convert or die

freedom is on the march...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great, another know-it-all: an Iranian who lives here
and is a professor at the Naval War College.

"Quick, get someone with an Arabic last name..." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I fear
Sistani may become the target of a sad black op....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gee, I hope these "associates" don't get in trouble for blabbing.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. al-Sistani is a guest in American Iraq. He just doesn't
get it does he? Does he really think that rich guys would invest billions in that place and then just give it away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So are our soldiers there to guard the investment?
It's time to pull out, they don't want us there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes the US/UK Troops are there to secure the Investment.
Phase 1 has been accomplished. Now Phase 2 must be completed.

Bush Regime Iraq Successes

1. Saddam will no longer sell Iraqi oil via the Euro.

2, A military foothold in the ME. Other than Saudi Arabia.

3, No countries will be able to buy Iraqi oil that the U.S. disapproves of.

4. The Multi-Intl. Oil Corps are reaping great profits.

"The terrorists want to control the oil. Our way of life will be at risk". George W. Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I stronlgy suspec t that Bushco will draw down...
around 40% of the troops a few months before '06 Elections but if the Insurgency is still strong and ramping up violence,those troops will be sent back after the Elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They can't do that.
They are just barely keeping the lid on with the 160,000 they have now. Any major troop reduction would also be a huge security reduction. None of the asshats calling for some gradual disengagement are thinking clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sistani May Call for US Withdrawal
http://www.juancole.com/2005/10/sistani-may-call-for-us-withdrawal.html">Juan Cole. Sistani May Call for US Withdrawal
If Sistani gives The Fatwa for a US withdrawal, the Bush administration will simply have to acquiesce. The situation would be similar to what happened in the Philippines in 1991, when the Philippines senate declined to authorize the extension of the treaty that permitted US naval bases in that country.

HAMZA HENDAWI. Al-Sistani said to weigh pullout demand: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/13024286.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Watch Zalmay Khalilzad...
... fly into a frenzy of activity. He's going to be busier than a deli cook at lunchtime for a few days, until he nips that in the bud. Can't have the puppet acting on its own--forced withdrawal isn't in the plan....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. and that would mean that Iraq would become aligned with Iran
this administration not only morally, but stratigically made one of the worst decisions in the history of our country

Instead of going after the real threat, i.e. terrorism, they instead diverted resources to a conflict that had NOTHING to do with 9/11, and now that Iran, Syria, and North Korea pose real threats with potential nuclear weapons, we are impotent

Where was Congress when they should have been doing their job providing checks and balances insteading of giving this administration the authority to go into Iraq

There is a lot of blame to go around. True the administration hold the most, but so do the moderate repukes, and democrats for giving him a free pass, even though enough people in the state department, and from the bush I era warned that Iraq was NOT the threat being portrayed



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Bombing countries in a war with terrorism is simply idiotic.
You can't wage war against a technique. Quit screwing around with these countries...stop stealing their stuff and trying to overthrow their governments and terrorism will end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You've got an extra http in your link. :)
www.juancole.com/2005/10/sistani-may-call-for-us-withdrawal.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. yupp...
http//www.juancole.com/2005/10/sistani-may-call-for-us-withdrawal.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Sistani is not in gov't, he is a cleric
I don't know how much influence he has {or will have}
on policy.

{I suppose he could run for parliment,
just like anyone else}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't understand your point
Juan Cole knows full well who Sistani is and knows that his voice is possibly the most influential in the country. I believe he is the reason there hasn't been an all-out civil war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. my point refers to the original-post's reference to the Phillipines
my recolection is, US left the navy bases,
because of an increase in rent demanded,
not because of religion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. The *only* reason we can stay is because al-Sistani
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 08:36 AM by psychopomp
made the decision to give the occupation time to hand over power to the Shiite majority. Now that he has given the "political process" sufficient time to have elections and make its constitution he believes the US has run out of reasons to stay. Al-Sistani, as well as all Iraqis, is ready to say goodbye to the Americans and the Brits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. He is THE PERSON in Iraq.
If Sistani issues a Fatwa, there will be 10 million Iraqis on the street an hour later.

And they will simply overrun the entire armed forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. amerikans need to figure out fast this isn't about the puppets in the GZ
It is all about what this guy wants....



how have you been Lynn? :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charles19 Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. He is the most powerful man in Iraq
If he calls for Shi'ites to turn Iraq upside down they will do it.

He has more power than the gov't because the people actually listen to him. Also he isn't morally corrupt, or a sell out to the US. He hasn't met with the US, even with the US wanting to meet with him since the invasion. This wins him a lot of support from the people for not just being another sellout to US interests.

http://sistani.org/html/eng/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. To Shi'ite Iraqis, Sistani would be a High Middle Ages pope in authority
All Shi'a Muslims in Iraq take this guy very seriously. Including those Shi'a politicians that enjoy being elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Here is a better link to the report....
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 08:58 AM by leftchick
I like stories that I don't have to register for.

Welcome to DU occuserpens!
:)



http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1260675

NAJAF, Iraq Oct 28, 2005 — Iraq's top Shiite cleric is considering demanding a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. and foreign troops after a democratically elected government takes office next year, according to associates of the Iranian-born cleric.

If the Americans and their coalition partners do not comply, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani would use peaceful means such as mass street protests to step up pressure for a pullout schedule, according to two associates of the cleric.

The associates spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the media. They are in regular contact with al-Sistani and call routinely on the 76-year-old cleric at his home in the holy city of Najaf south of Baghdad.

The reclusive al-Sistani rarely leaves his home and limits his public comments to religious decrees, or fatwas. He has steadfastly refused to meet with any American officials since the U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein's regime in 2003.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. (((leftchick)))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Could be just the excuse that the Administration wants...
...for bailing out of a war that has become an albatross around their necks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC