Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nations Predict Tough Resolution on Syria

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
callady Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:14 PM
Original message
Nations Predict Tough Resolution on Syria
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 09:18 PM by callady
Nations Predict Tough Resolution on Syria


Saturday October 29, 2005 2:31 AM

By EDITH M. LEDERER

Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States, France and Britain predicted Friday that the U.N. Security Council will adopt a tough resolution demanding Syria's cooperation in the investigation into the assassination of Lebanon's former prime minister. But Russia and Algeria oppose its threat of sanctions.

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said he expects the resolution to be put to a vote at a ministerial meeting of the Security Council on Monday. Foreign ministers from 13 of the 15 council nations are expected to attend, Bolton said.

The draft resolution - co-sponsored by the United States, France and Britain - strongly backs a report by the U.N. investigating commission which implicated top Syrian and Lebanese security officials in the assassination of Rafik Hariri and accused Syria of not cooperating fully with the probe.

It would require Syria to detain anyone the U.N. investigators consider a suspect and allow the individual to be questioned outside the country or without Syrian officials present. It would also immediately freeze the assets and impose a travel ban on anyone identified as a suspect by the commission.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5377693,00.html

One of the best blogs anywhere is Josh Landis':http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/L/Joshua.M.Landis-1/syriablog/

Thoughts on Syrian politics, history and religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. With any luck, the mideast will degenerate into total anarchy
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 08:55 AM by teryang
...this is what the neo-cons desire. Delusional ideologues. They think this is 1957. Just by increasing indirect support for unconventional warfare in Iraq, this policy will have unbelievable blowback. Syria, Iran, and the little understood Islamic financial infrastructure will put the costs right back on us. Our downside exposure in Iraq is tremendous.

By the way, I think the blog article on Syria is complete bs. The administrations Syria policy is astute? Who are they trying to fool? Who wrote this propaganda? Reform in Syria? This is definitely not the neo-con agenda. It's imperial power politics as usual based on delusions about the relative strength of our regime vis a vis the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. OK. They are going to again impose sanctions on an entire population
for the alleged, and remarkably unsupported, crimes of a handful. But there's no bias against Muslims, right? Have Israel or the US ever been placed under sanctions for their assassinations or UN violations? No bigotry here, nope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. We have to protest this.
We have to. F8ck these bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Nations" == "The United States, France and Britain" == "Bolton"
Another propaganda headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think economic sanctions should be the minimum.
The UN should speak with one voice about the actions of Syria in Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callady Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What's the maximum? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Exactly
Syria was butting itself into Lebanon's business long before the U.S. was butting itself into Iraq's business. Both are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callady Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Any other countries
butting into Lebanon's business?

Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarpa43 Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. I found this interesting

I work for a large manufacturing company that exports to all over the world. I personally work with India and we have been having trouble getting space on vessels heading that direction from the west coast.

The reasons we are getting from our shippers is that the US govt has the authority to take space on container ships when they need to move military equipment.
We had a lot of problems get space on ships a few years ago when we were gearing up for Iraq, now we have been told that the space is being taken up on ships heading to Syria.

Obviously this is at best third party info, but I will be keeping an eye open for what develops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hi scarpa43!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. If the Arabs or Muslims would only stick together...but they won't.
It is so tragic that we are never held accountable for anything we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Note that the bully Bush only picks on weak countries. China would make
Bush piss in his pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC