Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Labor Department (child) Labor Deal With Wal-Mart Criticized

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:59 PM
Original message
WP: Labor Department (child) Labor Deal With Wal-Mart Criticized
Labor Deal With Wal-Mart Criticized
Inspector General Cites 'Breakdowns'

By Amy Joyce
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 1, 2005; Page D03


Wal-Mart Stores Inc. received "significant concessions" from the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division when the department and Wal-Mart signed a settlement agreement last year after the company was cited for child labor violations, according to a Department of Labor inspector general report released yesterday.

While the agreement did not violate laws, the inspector general's office found "serious breakdowns" in the department's "negotiating, developing and approving" such agreements.

The agreement between Wal-Mart and the Wage and Hour Division "was significantly different from other agreements," the report concluded. "Specifically, the Wal-Mart agreement had the most far-reaching restrictions on authority to conduct investigations and assess ."

Wal-Mart agreed in January to pay a federal fine of $135,540 for child labor violations in which 85 minors operated hazardous equipment at stores in Connecticut, New Hampshire and Arkansas. The investigations into violations occurred from October 1998 through April 2002.

Some lawmakers and child advocate groups called the agreement a sweetheart deal, particularly because it stated the company will receive 15 days' notice "of any audit or investigation at the stores covered by this agreement."...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/31/AR2005103101241.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think we should just go to Costco or Sears instead.
Anyway, as Y Berra once said, it's so crowded at Walmart's, nobody goes there anymore, OWTTE*.


*Or Words To That Effect.

Besides, if you can believe what you read here, who wants to go to a store that contributes to Tom Delay and Ahnold Schwarzenbagel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I haven't even been tin a Wal-Mart in years
Because of the disdain in which they hold labor, US vendors, and the rights of local communities. I don't make much money, but I buy local as much as I can, and if I can't, Kmart, etc. gets my money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Librarian Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. No Free Rides At Wal-ee World
I'm embarrassed to admit I ever stepped foot in a Wal-Mart, but until someone decided to bring Wal-Mart injustices to light, how would we have know? It's been years since I've been in a Wal-Mart and the stories told by the employees are incredible. One employee I spoke with said it was mandatory for employees to engage in a cheering circle before a shift starts. Another employee told me that if profits were down on any given day, employees were sent home. Smacks of profit manipulation doesn't it? I too prefer to shop local or at discount stores that have principled employee practices. It's worth the few extra pennies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Labor Dept. Is Rebuked Over Pact With Wal-Mart
Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who asked the inspector general to investigate the settlement, said the report showed that the Bush administration was seeking to do favors for a powerful friend and a major Republican contributor in Wal-Mart.

"The Bush Labor Department chose to do an unprecedented favor for Wal-Mart, despite the fact it is well known for violating labor laws, including child labor laws," Mr. Miller said. "The sweetheart deal put Wal-Mart employees at risk, undermined government effectiveness, and further undermined public confidence that the government is acting on its behalf."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/01/national/01labor.html?ex=1131512400&en=98822a094c2fc25a&ei=5059&partner=AOL



http://www.walmartmovie.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC