Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three Massachusetts congressman now regret war vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:22 PM
Original message
Three Massachusetts congressman now regret war vote

http://www.eyewitnessnewstv.com/global/story.asp?s=4085424&ClientType=Printable

Three Massachusetts congressman now regret war vote

<snip>

Representatives Stephen Lynch, Ed Markey and Marty Meehan say knowing what they do now -- they would NOT have supported the use of force against Saddam Hussein.

The three were among 126 House Democrats who voted for the war resolution, which came a year after the September eleventh attacks.

Meehan and Lynch stress that they don't consider their votes a mistake.

Markey calls the war a "mistake."

Meehan accuses the Bush administration of misleading Congress about the threat from Iraq and what calls (quote) "their secret plans to go to war no matter what."



It's spreading, Dems proclaiming: "* duped us into war!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Too little,too late. They are asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. No Profiles in COURAGE for these Three
DINOS ALL

WELL WE TOLD THEM IT WOULD BE A CLUSTER FUCK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:26 PM
Original message
If it's too little too late, what's your solution? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Meehan and Lynch stress that they don't consider their votes a mistake."
well, considering OTHERWISE would be a start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree. They should admit their mistakes and move on. But
to say 'too little too late' doesn't mean anything. It's not realistic to want to throw out everyone in Congress who voted for the war, as I've seen suggested time and again on DU.
I'm more of the 'admit it and move on' crowd as there are many mistakes that need fixing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that is all i want from ALL of these bums
"ADMISSION"

THEN

ask for my forgiveness

they apparently aren't quite there yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. Move on to jail maybe. I would not trust either of those 3 murderers
with the life of my son. I hope all these warmongers are history when the time comes that my son is old enough to be grabbed up and forced to serve in these idiots stupid war crimes. If I knew better than to go into Afganistan and Iraq. Those evil little pricks sure as hell should have known. Both countries are nothing but a continuing blood bath for our troops. And that "a little to late" "admit their mistakes and move on" bullcrap does not cut it with me. Punish those evil bastards in the correct way. Send them to jail along with Bu$h Inc.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. I can see their point, in that if the intel had been
correct, then the vote would have been appropriate. They are parsing the fine line of the words of the misadministration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I didn't believe the "intelligence". Neither did most here who
followed international news, the reports of the IAEA, and who used common sense in looking at Saddam's capabilities after 10 years of brutal sanctions.

Why did they?

Not only were they 'duped', they wholeheartedly allowed themselves to be duped, to be panicked, not by Saddam but by the prospect of facing the voters who, they were being told, favored war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. however, a number of us in 2002 were getting our news from m$m and
even National Public Radio/TV was not making a case against going to war. I am older and wiser now. However, back then I did not just jump on the BushCo bandwagon b/c I KNEW they were asses from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Maybe...
they were presented with other false, but highly classified material to manipulate their votes, but they can't talk about it just yet, if ever.

Also, there really were a whole lot of citizens ready to Rambo. I wish they would have stood up then too, but if they had, they would have been run out of office and even more repugs would be in there instead of them, and I'm guessing that if that were the case, we'd be in a worse situation than we are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. I didn't believe it either
so you're right...their just a bunch of sh*t sacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't have a solution but I wasn't elected by the people of
Massachusetts,these guys were. They did a lousy job of representing most of the people here in Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whatever they have to do, just DO It already, DO YOUR JOBS!
Is it really so much to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. funny boys.... *I* KNEW THEN what you CLAIM to KNOW NOW
hhhmmmmmm

too little too late? i'll give you 2000+ reasons

and i LIVE here :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep. But it's a job being a politician.
Instead of paying attention to the people, they're paying attention to the money.

They need to go. I said it before and I'll say it again- a vote for the war means a boot out the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. That they were going to war no matter what is as obvious as the sun rising
in the east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well it will be nice to know who the voters will believe.
There are lies on both sides. To say that Bush led them into war on lies is itself a lie. But it is the best thing for us if the people believe it and not Bushes lies.


It is a way for the Dems to get off the hook and pass the blame on to Bush. Had they done their jobs there would have not been a war IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll take this, rather than complaining too little, too late
I also like the way they shifted the talking point from their votes being a mistake to the war being a mistake. That puts the onus on *Bushco, where it belongs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. How come WE knew about their 'secret plans', but these bozos
didn't?

I think it was intentional ignorance and actual downright stupidity in thinking this clusterfuck would go well and that they would be on the winning side of this disaster.

Numbnuts, weazel, gasbags.

Okay, now that they've been whacked a bit, scowl at them and tell them now to DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR FUCK UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. The weather vane was standing still, while the hand was going
for the cookie jar.

As soon as the strong wind was detected, the numbnuts, weasels, and gasbags, gave it the 'oh, cough, cough bit, and decided to sail with the blast.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dear Massachusetts congressmen,
So glad you woke up to the evils residing in and around the White House.

For your penance, speak up LOUDER about the next crimes you notice them doing.

And more importantly, start listening to your constituents, many of whom were writing letters and demonstrating in the streets against this war.

Represent us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. and so it (finally) begins...

I think we should keep a list somewhere of the present Democrats and Blue State Republicans in Congress and the extent to which they've repudiated 'Yes' votes on the IWR.

The pretext ('duped' or whatever) they give isn't important, as I see it. (It's all politics here, not deathbed confessions.) Washing their hands of things as they are now matters more.

In the Senate I think Kerry, Reid, Feinstein, Rockefeller, and Daschle can be safely said to have walked away from 'Yes' votes at this point. The most important holdouts at this point are Hillary Clinton and Mr. Joementum, but all five 'Yes'-voting Senators representing parts of the NYC metro area are unrepentant as yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Hillary's too busy playing "G.I. Jane" and ...
god only knows what Joementum is thinking. I wouldn't look for him to recant. He'll ride this one to the bitter end ... like all the good little "Repubs" will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's a start, but it's hard to forget
the night of that vote. That was the night so many innocents were condemned to death.

But, what they do now that they believe the Bush administration had 'secret plans to go to war no matter what' is the question . Btw, most of us knew that back then, so I'm still wondering why they were duped, but anyway ~ moving forward for the moment. Now, they have no choice but to call for the impeachment of both Bush and Cheney.

They cannot say that the Administration lied about trying to find a peaceful solution, and then just move on. To lie about war is probably one of the worst lies a president can tell.

If a lie about sex got a president impeached, this surely will be something Republicans who voted for the sex impeachment will jump on board for??? Time to test their sincerity about honesty in government. Leaving this cabal in office is dangerous to the lives of the troops and to innocents in other country.

These congressmen need to thoroughly study the PNAC so they understand who really is running this country and what their plans are for Syria, Iran and elsewhere ~ they can no longer turn a blind eye to the danger they present, and then two years from now 'Oh, if only I had known back then .....' The information is available, we got it, they need to get.

I remember Ron Paul bringing Michael Ledeen's book into the House and reading from it his colleagues, warning them about the philosophy of the neocons. So, it's hard for me to believe they had no idea what this administration had planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is the fig leaf that they HAVE to use.
They'll talk down the fact that the lies were obvious years ago, and pretend that the case for war was convincing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. Did they know something that I didn't back then?
Because, at the time I sure as hell wouldn't have voted to start a war/invasion/occupation of the place based on the "intelligence" I was hearing. Hell, rumsfeld admitted at the time that the info they had was 10 years old & pre- Ritter.
Those guys were afraid not to vote for it, they ought to be kicked the hell out now for being cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Well, it's entirely possible
That not only were they provided with the info the public was given, but also given or presented with additional false materials that were "classified" (so they can't talk about it...yet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. They should have had the guts and sense that Barbara Lee had.
Remember how Rush Limbaugh smeared her? It was the first "swiftboate-like attack" and it was awful. Also Pat Robertson had some nasty things to say about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No, I don't remember. What did Barbara Lee do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. This article misleads
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

the 126 figure is the Democratic NO votes. The yea votes were 81.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I thank the Goodess that my congressman ,DeFazio, voted no.
He is one of the few I can count on in that mess of a House. and I say the same for the evil Senate. Everytime I think my temper is under control---wrong. Not yet.I hope the Yea sayers suffer for their dishonesty. We know that they KNEW. Filthy liars.As for these 2 creeps. may they lose their seats in disgrace. Anyone contesting them? I hope. I am sick of Dems who have no scruples. But, the sad thing is , the sheeple will re-elect them. Someday, maybe......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well good!!..Time to repent and turn this mess around!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Good for them--Maybe they will spur others to do this also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm glad my rep (Olver) voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think there is nothing wrong.....
about admitting a mistake. While I wish they had been more informed and tried to get their own data, instead of relying on the the cherry picked data from the Admin. I never believed the Saddam/Osama connection or the WMD-it just never added up. I am proud that I opposed war with Iraq before we went in and made my feelings known in every way I could.

Of course, living in Texas and having seen Bush close up, I knew he was lying because his lips were moving. I figured the rest of the nation might not have picked that up yet-what with all the smoke and mirrors. Of course, many were baying for blood after the 9/11 attacks so there was much pressure on the Congressmen from constituents. Remember, the majority of American's were in favour of the war (of course, they were lied to also).

I applaud members who have the courage to admit a mistake, and I wish more would stop being so mealy mouthed about it. To steal a phrase from Rumsfield....we went to war with the data we were given, not the data we needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaloBorges Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
33. They failed to hear those who were not convinced
like Gore, and Dean who opposed the invasion (please don't call it war, its an invasion), they should have done their homework and demand verifiable proof.

They voted for the invasion as they thought it to be the politically correct decision to further their careers.

We need to get rid of most politicians, and slap Howard Dean to wake him up.

Lets have Gore throw his candidacy for 2008, I think the country will see him with different eyes this time, they will not buy the stupid "meme" of Gore being too rigid, not your "lets have a beer kind-of-guy", now the country knows what happens when you vote for an idiot like the one you may want as a clown for one of your barbecues, he'll end up drunk, do all the wrong things and shame you in front of your friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Get ready...
We're going to be seeing a lot of these "I would vote different now, but I didn't make a mistake" statements up to the next election. Personally, I think the guys from MA did it early so they could gage the reaction to help those who are in more "at risk" seats. No matter what happens, a Democrat will still occupy Lynch, Markey and Meehan's seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
38. One'a those is MINE
I ripped him a new asshole for his vote. He sent me a weak, three page justification, he was clearly troubled and struggling to nuance his reasoning. I slapped the shit out of him, and made sure he knew my military background, too, which is probably why I got the long, serious letter.

They all need to admit that at the very least, their trust in that fucking corporate warmonging Monkey was a mistake of the highest order. The zookeepers sure as hell don't turn the checkbook over to the creature in the chimp cage, and they were wrong to cede their check and balance authority over the executive branch.

May it never happen again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. Yep. All they have to say: "Because I TRUSTED my president, and he
LIED to me."

ALL they have to say. I'm glad to see some are coming around. A little late, though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
41. What's wrong with the word "mistake?"
Are these people gods who never err - like, say... Bush? What's so hard about saying, "I was duped. I made a mistake."? What's so hard about that?

Here, watch. It's easy, really.

"The teacher gave us the wrong information in class which caused me to make a mistake on my test."

"The guy on the radio said gas was cheaper on the corner. I made the mistake of listening to him and ended up paying a dime more than the people down the street."

See...? It's simple, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC