Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yahoo! News/Reuters: Senate asks Pentagon to probe Feith role on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:19 AM
Original message
Yahoo! News/Reuters: Senate asks Pentagon to probe Feith role on Iraq
link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/iraq_usa_feith_dc;_ylt=A9G_RwVl2XFDLj8BDQdhr7sF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl



Tue Nov 8, 9:39 PM ET

The Pentagon's inspector general has been asked to investigate the prewar intelligence role of a planning office headed by former U.S. defense policy chief Douglas Feith, a main architect of the Iraq war, officials said on Tuesday.

The request was made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in a letter sent in August.

It said the Defense Department should determine whether Feith and his Office of Special Plans wielded excessive influence over intelligence that claimed Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The threat of such weapons, which have never been found in Iraq, was cited as a main justification for President George W. Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski should be the first witness!
MoJo was all over this almost two years ago....

<snip>

It's a crisp fall day in western Virginia, a hundred miles from Washington, D.C., and a breeze is rustling the red and gold leaves of the Shenandoah hills. On the weather-beaten wood porch of a ramshackle 90-year-old farmhouse, at the end of a winding dirt-and-gravel road, Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski is perched on a plastic chair, wearing shorts, a purple sweatshirt, and muddy sneakers. Two scrawny dogs and a lone cat are on the prowl, and the air is filled with swarms of ladybugs.

So far, she says, no investigators have come knocking. Not from the Central Intelligence Agency, which conducted an internal inquiry into intelligence on Iraq, not from the congressional intelligence committees, not from the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. All of those bodies are ostensibly looking into the Bush administration's prewar Iraq intelligence, amid charges that the White House and the Pentagon exaggerated, distorted, or just plain lied about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda terrorists and its possession of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. In her hands, Kwiatkowski holds several pieces of the puzzle. Yet she, along with a score of other career officers recently retired or shuffled off to other jobs, has not been approached by anyone.

Kwiatkowski, 43, a now-retired Air Force officer who served in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia (NESA) unit in the year before the invasion of Iraq, observed how the Pentagon's Iraq war-planning unit manufactured scare stories about Iraq's weapons and ties to terrorists. "It wasn't intelligence‚ -- it was propaganda," she says. "They'd take a little bit of intelligence, cherry-pick it, make it sound much more exciting, usually by taking it out of context, often by juxtaposition of two pieces of information that don't belong together." It was by turning such bogus intelligence into talking points for U.S. officials‚ -- including ominous lines in speeches by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell's testimony at the U.N. Security Council last February‚ -- that the administration pushed American public opinion into supporting an unnecessary war.

Until now, the story of how the Bush administration produced its wildly exaggerated estimates of the threat posed by Iraq has never been revealed in full. But, for the first time, a detailed investigation by Mother Jones, based on dozens of interviews‚ -- some on the record, some with officials who insisted on anonymity‚ -- exposes the workings of a secret Pentagon intelligence unit and of the Defense Department's war-planning task force, the Office of Special Plans. It's the story of a close-knit team of ideologues who spent a decade or more hammering out plans for an attack on Iraq and who used the events of September 11, 2001, to set it into motion.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2004/01/12_405.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Damn straight! And line up all of Hersh's sources, too!
Gen. Tommy Franks on Doug Feith:

"the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. GOOD!! Little Dougie has skated for far toooooooooo long. What is
that reptilian bastard doing for a living now, I wonder? What death-dealing scams to bankrupt a country is he pulling, or has he gone totally underground with the help of his boss Big Dick Cheney?

When will we get around to Wolfie and Perle and the rest of the butchers? Why is Rumsfeld still in office? We have a LOT of work to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. seems to me--this committee wants everybody except Bush to be blamed.


.....The request was made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in a letter sent in August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good that the Feith and the OSP are in focus, but...
this IG investigation is a Republican stalling tactic.
From the article:

"In no way does the vice chairman believe the IG's investigation should
be a substitute for the committee's work. The committee agreed to look
at this and it needs to fulfill its commitment," said Rockefeller
spokeswoman Wendy Morigi.


The committe has the OSP sqarely in its sights, the OSP
has become uncooperative, and now the Republicans are
trying to punt the case over the the Inspector General.
The Democrats need to keep the heat on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't this a case of the fox guarding the henhouse?


...The Pentagon's inspector general has been asked to investigate the prewar intelligence role of a planning office headed by former U.S. defense policy chief Douglas Feith, a main architect of the Iraq war, officials said on Tuesday.

The request was made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in a letter sent in August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Feith worked for the Pent. -and both cheney and Rummy liked his work!

Feith, who left the Pentagon earlier this year, has also been blamed for overseeing what is widely considered to have been inadequate postwar planning in Iraq, which is now gripped by a bloody insurgency.

....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The request was put in in Aug. and no decison has been made yet.


A Defense Department spokesman said it had not yet decided whether to undertake the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Then this MSM story is a VERY good thing...puts a little more heat on. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. and for fence-sitters
*those who recognize we went on faulty intell - but still can't accept that our govt would act in such bad faith as to do so through intentional deception* - ask: If it was just faulty intel, then why have all of the key players in charge been kept in place, promoted, or given medals? If it was an honest mistake - wouldn't one remove those who had been so inept? Leaves folks having to think about that point for awhile. Sad that we have to keep pointing out the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. hmmm 60 days later...You suppose this is the Harry effect?
The important part of this is the link it can possibly bring into critical scrutiny between the Wilson/Yellowcake story and the misadventures of Team B.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. here's the flowchart:
http://foi.missouri.edu/polinfoprop/liefactory.html

excerpt:

Until now, the story of how the Bush administration produced its wildly exaggerated estimates of the threat posed by Iraq has never been revealed in full. But, for the first time, a detailed investigation by Mother Jones, based on dozens of interviews—some on the record, some with officials who insisted on anonymity—exposes the workings of a secret Pentagon intelligence unit and of the Defense Department's war-planning task force, the Office of Special Plans. It's the story of a close-knit team of ideologues who spent a decade or more hammering out plans for an attack on Iraq and who used the events of September 11, 2001, to set it into motion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. What happened with the spying investigation?
Wasn't Feith wrapped up in that as well?

Too much going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Noooooooooooo! It's a trick; Roberts is using a stall tactic-
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 11:55 AM by Rose Siding
However, Democrats on the committee including the vice chairman, Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia, opposed Roberts' action and warned the move could delay the Senate investigation of Feith's office by up to a year.
....
"In no way does the vice chairman believe the IG's investigation should be a substitute for the committee's work. The committee agreed to look at this and it needs to fulfill its commitment," said Rockefeller spokeswoman Wendy Morigi.

She said Rockefeller was not aware of Roberts' request to the inspector general until after the letter had been sent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Isn't he the dumbest muthafucka Tommy Franks has ever met?
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 12:50 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
That's pretty bad. Considering how much time he spent with bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC