Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers back one-year windfall tax on oil companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bufffbison Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 PM
Original message
Lawmakers back one-year windfall tax on oil companies
http://www.jsonline.com/bym/news/nov05/370956.asp

Washington - In a sign of the political impact of soaring energy prices, the Republican-controlled Senate Finance Committee voted on Tuesday to impose a $5 billion tax next year on the nation's biggest oil companies.


The measure amounts to a one-year windfall profits tax, a concept that most Republicans had until recently denounced as a discredited idea from the 1970s. It was added to a larger bill that would cut taxes by about $61 billion over the next five years.

Conservative Senate Republicans who support the oil industry bitterly protested the measure, noting that Congress had just approved billions in new tax breaks to encourage oil and gas exploration. But every Republican voted for the overall package, which passed the committee by 14-8 and which the full Senate is expected to take up today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a good thing, right?
Edited on Tue Nov-15-05 11:48 PM by merwin
There's nothing hidden in there that will give them 8 billion of tax breaks for the 5 billion they pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Durbin's version makes payments tax deductible
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 12:26 AM by marbuc
and I assume a Republican bill would include this as well. What really concerns me are the unrelated tax breaks for exploration. If business is so good they can pay for this themselves. That what the so called "free market" is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess they know the sheeple are not asleeple.
This year's election results were not what the Reps expected (except in Ohio where they control the returns) so they are starting to sweat 2006. I think these measures are grandstanding. If they were serious about the welfare of the country, they would do some serious work on the deficit like raise taxes, universal health care and getting us the fuck out of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. And this helps the country HOW, again?
The oil companies have fleeced us before, why should they get these breaks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know what good a windfall tax will do for the consumers
After the cigarette companies were sued, the price of smokes didn't drop... they went up.

If a tax is imposed on the oil companies the cash will just flow into a huge trough with bureaucratic pigs surrounding it. The price of gas will remain high ...or go up.

In the 60s there were MANY small oil companies competing for business. The gas stations checked your oil, cleaned your windshield, and gave away incentives. Since then the many companies merged into the FIVE conglomerates we saw before the Senate last week.

While watching that I realized that it probably wasn't the first time those five execs sat together in a meeting.

I don't think tax penalties would be as effective as government oversight of industries that are vital to life in America.

Re-regulate and diversify:
Oil
Food
telecommunication
Broadcast media

Monopolies hurt consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah... about that statement - Monopolies hurt consumers.

Monopolies hurt consumers. - A duh, you'd think we'd have learned that lesson in the beginning of the last century or during the GREAT DEPRESSION!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC