Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the Line: The Internets Future

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
callady Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 08:29 AM
Original message
On the Line: The Internets Future
On the line: the internet's future

Ownership: World leaders meet today to discuss regulation; US fighting to regain control of global network. Censorship: State power increasingly used to limit access; Dissenters beaten outside summit site

By Daniel Howden

Published: 16 November 2005


Over the next three days a United Nations summit, in the unlikely setting of Tunisia, will attempt to thrash out the future of the internet. More than 40 world leaders, including Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, are set to attend, and the ownership of the World Wide Web itself is at stake. What the delegates won't discuss is the creeping spectre of censorship.

What began as a military research project at the Pentagon has exploded into the most powerful network in the world and an entity upon which the global economy increasingly relies. Its future character is now in question.

At present, the closest the internet has to a governing body is an obscure American, non-profit corporation called Icann. This quasi-independent body has, for years, quietly regulated domain names and allocated addresses. But its lease is nearly up. And the world's rich and powerful will join battle for control of what they see as a gold mine.

The Bush administration wants Icann turned into a private corporation, on US soil and subject to US controls. Much of the rest of the world objects to that but the loudest opponents are countries with a history of censorship and repression, such as China and Iran. The likely balance of power in that struggle rests with the European Union, whose position is not clear.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article327341.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Internet belongs to the whole world
I don't think we should allow just one country total control. Nor should it be put is the hands of a 'private' US Corp. This power grab by the US can not be allowed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. See also follow-up piece: Negotiators water down text on net governance
Negotiators from more than 100 countries have agreed to leave the United States in charge of the Internet's addressing system, averting a US-EU showdown at this week's UN technology summit.

US officials said early today that instead of transferring management of the system to an international body such as the United Nations, an international forum would be created to address concerns. The forum, however, would have no binding authority.

US Assistant Secretary of Commerce Michael Gallagher said the deal means the United States will leave day-to-day management to the private sector, through a quasi-independent organisation called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article327387.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. For the record, Mercury is Retrograde
The little planet symbolizing communications went into apparent Rx motion on Sunday night, and will appear to keep backpedaling until Dec. 3.

As the solons of OLDE would say, this classic Mercurial omen bodes ill for any internet agreements reached at this time. They are unlikely to hold for long.

"Ad astra per aspera."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. more likely, there will be set backs and undecided until after dec 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. If privately owned, everything about it would be a corporate secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC