Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mundell Will Not Challenge Sen. Feinstein

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:43 PM
Original message
Mundell Will Not Challenge Sen. Feinstein
By Michael Finnegan, Times Staff Writer


Bill Mundell, the only Republican making serious preparations to challenge U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein's bid for reelection, said Tuesday he has decided not to run, leaving the GOP with no clear contender for one of California's top races for 2006.

The move by Mundell, an education software executive, reflects the difficulty Republicans face in finding a strong candidate to challenge the popular Democratic incumbent.

In an interview, Mundell said he was willing to spend several million dollars of his own money on the race, but would have needed to collect much more from donors to mount a viable campaign. He said his conversations with the party's major contributors in California made clear that donors do not plan to put substantial money behind any push to oust Feinstein, and he had no interest in running a "vanity campaign."

Mundell, chief executive of Vidyah Inc., had raised his public profile this year as a major supporter of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Nov. 8 ballot measure to strip state lawmakers of their power to draw district maps for themselves and members of Congress.

more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-me-senate30nov30,1,170312.story?coll=la-headlines-politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. His propositions lost and he would have been a loser against Feinstein
He was smart to quit because he would have lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Even is they had passed
He probably wouldn't have had much of a chance against the most popular Democrat in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. She is NOT the most popular dem in CA-she's married to a war profiteer nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I also wouldn't call her a Dem.
Based on her corporatist voting record.

She needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm sure that lots of Democrats are lining up to take her on, right?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. unfortunately, none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No one wants to take on the popular Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. It's all about the money-
although insofar as you seem to equate money with popularity- your position is logical.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Arlen Specter had a lot of money last year, but he still faced
a serious primary challenge. He alsmost lost the nomination. The guy (or gal) with the most money doesn't always win. Just ask Howard Dean and Al Checchi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Which Democratic in CA is more popular than her?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. why can't we get a REAL Dem to run against DiFi?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Everyone is afraid to run against her
People know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. She will be elected. After, we in Cali have six years to find...
A more progressive candidate to challenge her in the Primaries.

If we manage to end up with 51 Democratic Senators in 2006, and two of them are DiFi and Joementum, we still get control over the various commitees and such, right? The balance of power shifts drastically with the majority. Keep that in mind when thinking about certain Senators what calls themselves Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Dianne won't be on the ballot in six years.
This will be her last term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. There were DUers claiming a year or tow ago that she wouldn't run in 2006
And now it appears they were wrong. Some politicians enjoy their jobs too much to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. She'll be in almost 80 in 2012
but then again, Dianne is in good health so you never know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Byrd is 89 and he is running for reelection nex year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's one tuff old bird!!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. And Thurmond served until he was 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. What makes you believe the next six years will be different than
the last six?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Nice...so she gets a nice "walk" to the plate. Repigs like her a lot, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. yeah, she gets enough support from them because of
her position on fiscal issues. and her strong positions on abortion, gun control secure her the dem voters.

it's a waste of money for republicans to run someone against her unless they do it more as a testing of new strategies for other elections where they have a better chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Apperently Democrats like her a lot too
When was the last time some one challengered her in a primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriverrat Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. I wonder....
"He said his conversations with the party's major contributors in California made clear that donors do not plan to put substantial money behind any push to oust Feinstein"

Could the "party's major contributors" be reluctant to mess with a good thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. They don't want to waste money on a losing cause
It appears that Senator Fienstein will be reeelcted no matter what the Republicans do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC