Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missouri Pharmacists Balk at Contraception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:21 PM
Original message
Missouri Pharmacists Balk at Contraception
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BIRTH_CONTROL_PHARMACISTS?SITE=VARIT&SECTION=US

<snip>

Missouri Pharmacists Balk at Contraception

By JIM SUHR
AP Business Writer

ST. LOUIS (AP) -- Walgreen Co. said it has put four Illinois pharmacists in the St. Louis area on unpaid leave for refusing to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception in violation of a state rule.

The four cited religious or moral objections to filling prescriptions for the morning-after pill and "have said they would like to maintain their right to refuse to dispense, and in Illinois that is not an option," Walgreen spokeswoman Tiffani Bruce said.

A rule imposed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich in April requires Illinois pharmacies that sell contraceptives approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to fill prescriptions for emergency birth control. Pharmacies that do not fill prescriptions for any type of contraception are not required to follow the rule.

Ed Martin, an attorney for the pharmacists, on Tuesday called the discipline "pretty disturbing" and said they would consider legal action if Walgreen doesn't reconsider.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This just in
Amish Computer Technicians Refuse to Repair Computers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. oh no! not them too!
I have a multi dollar contract with those guys!...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. They should just let them go
Message delivered in big bold letters: if a MD. prescribes it, or it's a legal medication/substance, THEN YOU DISPENSE IT.

Or you go work someplace else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly. As long as it's legal, the company is within it's rights
to fire them. If I just refuse to do my job, my company can fire me, as long as what they asked me to do is legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I for one don't want editorializing from my pharmacist
on ANY subject. Other people besides the pharmacist (Doctors, clinical researchers) are to decide what's safe; other people (legislators and judges) decide what's legal. The pharmacist has no right to interpose his judgement between me and people with lawful authority to speak on the subjects of safety or legality.

If the pharmacist doesn't want to perform his job as a pharmacist, which is in essence to be a fucking vending machine that checks signatures, then he can go flip burgers instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well, to be clear:
Pharmacists do have a duty to watch what their customers bring them to be dispensed; they are partners with prescribers to make sure patients are getting what they need and getting it safely. They're also charged with keeping an eye out for drug fraud and abuse. So, some amount of "editorializing" can be a good thing, professionally speaking. Obviously, nobody has any business making judgments based on religion. In fact, doing so very much violates the intent of said partnership between physician and pharmacist because it blatantly thwarts the medical decision of the presciber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I'm waiting for the first emotional distress lawsuit from a patient who...
... went in to get a prescription filled, and got a sanctimonious lecture and a big hassle instead.

As for the vending machine analogy, that's not far off. I posted below about automated dispensing systems, and I have to say I'm all for it. If the pill-counters no longer want to count pills, then replace them with robots. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. This is such a pet peeve with me....
I am a Registered Nurse. I have taken care of some of the worst scumbags you can imagine (wife beaters, sexual assault of child). I loathed every minute I had to do it but I did it....Why, because I am a professional. I gave them the same care I would my own family. And damn it, your professional license mean you are suppose to do your job, damn it. No matter what your feelings are, PERIOD!!!! I think they should be fired and their licenses revoked for abandonment or negligence of duty. Hell, they are real quick to blame a nurse and yank her license for the least little error (even if the doc wrote an illegible order and the pharmacist filled it wrong, and she was just following the order). Sorry lady you should have been able to divine that it was a mistake(that is a true case) so you are the only one that gets your license yanked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Their pharmacist degree should be revoked too so they
can't get a job in a different state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. If you cannot do your job,
then you need to get out and find another line of work. I am in the mental health field. I have worked with a sexual predator of little boys. You have to put your personal feeling aside, or get another JOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
59. EXACTLY!
The prescriptions are LEGAL, written by doctors. The pharmacist's job is to fill these prescriptions.

So, I'm assuming they refuse to fill scripts for Viagara, et al?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. There is only one other instance where they could be justified
in not filling a prescription...


If they have reason to believe that the medication will cause a reaction that may result in serious health problems or death. But only after bringing it to the attention of the doctor and the doctor prescribes a substitute medication.

Pharmacists are not licensed to prescribe medication nor should they be allowed to refuse filling out a prescription just because of their belief. The welfare of the patient is more important than any other person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. Refusing to fill a prescription is itself a prescription...
...and if you want to practice medicine, go to med school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
48. exactly, i couldn't say it in
clearly english myself....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Consider legal action"?
How DARE Walgreens follow the law. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. why are these people pharamicists!?
they get a Doctors order, not a doctors suggestion, and fill it for the patient.

what if they are anti-gay, does that mean they don't dispense AZT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Probably. Don't give them any ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyn Michael Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. "if they are anti-gay..."
"...does that mean they don't dispense AZT?"

I'd give it about a year or so before we hear about the first case of that. Just when you think these people couldn't POSSIBLY be any crazier...they go and outdo themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. My fear is that they will stop dispensing other medications made by those
companies that manufacture emergency contraception (or ANY contraception, for that matter...that's the ultimate target of the pro-criminalization forces) because they don't want to support those companies in ANY way as long as they continue to manufacture the contraceptives.
"Sorry, no high blood pressure meds for you; happy heart attack!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. What's Next ? Jehovah Witness Pharmacy?
Dispensing advice and kind words?

If you have that strong of an aversion to "some drugs", then you should NOT become a pharmacist..

What about a pharmacist who thinks it's not OK for 85 yr old men to take viagra?? Can he/she refuse to fill the scrip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Probably the "Jehovah's Witness Blood Bank"
I always wondered why they didn't "hit" blood banks they way the anti's do abortion clinics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
50. Re: Probably the "Jehovah's Witness Blood Bank"
As I was going through this, I was thinking along the same line. Your on the operating table, your doctor is a Jehovah Witness... you need a blood transfusion.... WHAT IF YOUR DOCTOR REFUSES?!?!!?

I also had a "Born Again" assistant. She would not fill out paperwork or checks for the Life Insurance company because she didn't believe in Life Insurance, Jesus was her Life Insurance!

A Pharmacist who doesnt' dispense prescriptions for "religious" reasons should not be a Pharmacist.

Dap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's carry this idiocy to the next level
Policeman who don't want to investigate a homicide because the victim doesn't meet their moral criteria? How about lawyers who plead guilty for their client because God told them to? Maybe the electric company won't want to turn on your power because you use it to watch "objectionable" TV shows? Perhaps the postman won't deliver your mail becuase his church doesn't approve of your church.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. That's an excellent point
People are paid to do a job, not make moral judgments about others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Sales persons who won't sell meat because they are vegetarian.
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 07:20 PM by lizzy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #37
51. Waitresses/waiters who won't serve meat because they're vegetarians. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Great minds think alike and at the same time!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Welcome to DU! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #37
52. and you edited this?
I'd hate to go to a restaraunt, order a steak and have someone say "I'm sorry sir, I am a vegitarian and an Animal Rights Activist, I cannot place that order for you.... could I offer you a salad?"

What is this world coming to?

Dap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Where's tha cartoon of...
A guy getting some condoms easily and a woman trying to get contraceptive pills and the pharmacist elling her she's a whore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. If these people can not dispense legal medication for moral reasons
then they need to find another profession.... Like maybe become preachers.

If a woman takes a job as a stripper, she can't keep her job if she uses the excuse that it is immoral for her to take her clothes off.

Maybe it is immoral but she took the job.

Maybe stripper is a bad choice but it demonstrates the fact that you took the damn job, so you don't have the right to decide when and how you are going to practice the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. Exactly. It's legally prescribed medication.
The pharmacist should have no business whatsoever in deciding which medication is o'key to take, and which is not, if it's legally prescribed by the Dr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, it's time to embrace automation. Most mail-order pharmacies...
... use robotic dispensing systems now, and they have a very good accuracy record, comparable to or better than human-counted systems.

There are even some vending machine-style systems in development for in-store use as well, where the prescription info is input and the pills are counted, bottled and placed in the traditional little white bag... then delivered directly to the customer like a soda dropping down in a soda machine.

If pharmacy professionals and their representative groups aren't willing to agree that all prescriptions must be dispensed, with no discussion of the pharmacists' personal hang-ups, then I fully favor replacing them with robots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. But but but...
Then some people might get a hold of vicodin or Oxycontin and go. . .uh, sleep in a corner?

And Adderall, some kids might illegally get that, and then they could get all hopped up on uppers and uh. . .clean their room and do their homework?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. The problem with that idea
A mail-order pharmacy isn't a wise choice for filling a prescription for the morning-after pill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Thus the push to develop in-store dispensors.
If the store stocks a particular medicine, the machine dispenses it. No god-nonsense required.

If the store itself chooses not to sell a particular drug... well, that's a business decision it will make whether humans or robots are counting the pills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samurai_Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Mail order pharmacies still have to have pharmacists verify
I worked for one. Yes, we had a big, fancy, multi-million dollar dispensing machine. But at the end of the line, the pharmacist STILL had to verify the prescription. You can't dispense any drug without a pharmacist's approval in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Very true. But that's one pharmacist playing an oversight role...
... instead of several doing the sorting and counting. It's far less likely that a business is going to allow that one person to decide what gets sold and what doesn't.

I think the day will come when there is a pharmacist in a sort of control center remotely overseeing dispensing machines in multiple stores. True, that person may suddenly decide not to approve certain meds. But I doubt he or she would get away with it long, when the impact would be so widespread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow--when did Walgreen's change their position?
Last I heard, they were allowing their pharmacists to get away with this shit. Glad to see they've come to their senses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimbo S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. IL state law?
That's how I perceive it from the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Exactly -- because it's against STATE law, not Walgreen's "law"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. One advantage of living on a state line...
If one state does something stupid, you can always try the other one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well.....
even living in the 4 corners area wouldn't be to helpful...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Does Illinois need more republicans? Is that why they "Balk" at the pill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
interupt Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. These guys must have been "born again" after their education
The four cited religious or moral objections to filling prescriptions for the morning-after pill and "have said they would like to maintain their right to refuse to dispense, and in Illinois that is not an option," Walgreen spokeswoman Tiffani Bruce said.


I don't get how they could have passed all their exams and classes to be pharmacists with such moral or religious objections. There are a lot of things that Pharmacists are required to dispense that would offend them.

I remember during my first physiology nursing class the lecturer talking about evolution and cell life only to have a student admonish him for not saying "God created everything. You speak Blasphemy!" The lecturer replied "Well you are going to fail THIS class then."

The Auditorium laughed and we never saw her again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. You only have 72 hours
If you were "exposed" on a weekend, and can't get a prescription from your doctor until Monday morning, this can really create a burden if you don't have other pharmacies you can get to easily. These people should not be allowed to dispense medicine of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Should I Just Assume All These Pharmacists Have 8 + Kids?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ucmike Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. i'd ask the pharmacist to lean in so i could whisper...
in his ear. then bang his forehead against the counter like charlie murphy did to rick james, bitch.

what balls they have. they hold a state (or fed, i'm not sure) license and then pick and choose what part of their job they want to do.

i have a state drivers license, but from now on, i will pick and choose what traffic laws i find objectionable and not obey them.

do these pharmacist pricks have any objection to the way pharmaceuticals are marketed in this country? i've never heard of a pharmacist refusing to fill a prescription because its overpriced or unneccesary or because a prescribing doc got some perk from the drug reps.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Why on Earth did these people became pharmacists?
If the Dr. prescribed something-why is it their business to decide what medication is o'key to take, and what is not?
What's next? Regular birth control? Anti-AIDS drugs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Regular BC Pills AND
instance of them refusing to dispense pain meds and mood stablizers. I guess for the last two they just think you should PRAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. "Why on Earth did these people became pharmacists?"
This always amazes me, it's as if these fscktards go through all that training & just now realize they have "moral objections". Sorry, sweetie, you knew what would happen when you went through pharmacy school; it's time for you to go to another profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Maybe they went into that field because of their morals objections.
Fundy christians would love such a position of power from which to enforce their moral objections. They wank over things like this.

They absolutely would go into this profession, for exactly that reason: to be able to "stop abortions" before they happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Fire them - period. It's state law. Follow it or leave. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
44. ...and balk at walking upright and breathing through the nose. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. They should force each of these Pharmacists to adopt an unwanted child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autobot77 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
49. Goddamn Activist Pharmacists

These assholes knew what they were getting into when they decided to become a pharmacist, theyre just using this as an excuse to force thier brand of fundamentalist religion on people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dapper Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
55. A bit OT but about activists...
Whenever I hear about "activists" splashing paint on someone wearing a Fur Coat... my mind wanders, I forsee the person pulling a shotgun from under their fur coat and ...

Really, I'm not a bad person :-)

Dap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
56. Walgreens places 4 pharmacists on leave - Contraceptive wasn't dispensed
Walgreens places 4 pharmacists on leave
Contraceptive wasn't dispensed

By Jim Suhr, Associated Press | December 1, 2005

ST. LOUIS -- Walgreen Co. said it has put four Illinois pharmacists in the St. Louis area on unpaid leave for refusing to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception in violation of a state rule.
Article Tools

The four cited religious or moral objections to filling prescriptions for the morning-after pill and ''have said they would like to maintain their right to refuse to dispense, and in Illinois that is not an option," Walgreen spokeswoman Tiffani Bruce said.

A rule imposed by Governor Rod Blagojevich in April requires Illinois pharmacies that sell contraceptives approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to fill prescriptions for emergency birth control.

<snip>

Walgreen, based in Deerfield, Ill., put the four on leave Monday, Bruce said. She would not identify them. They will remain on unpaid leave ''until they either decide to abide by Illinois law or relocate to another state" without such a rule or law.

More: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/12/01/walgreens_places_4_pharmacists_on_leave/

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. No lack of Missouri pharmacists in the future, then
Oh, they mean contraception for other people. That's just not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
60. we should show walgreens some support in this
somehow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Can A Scientologist Pharmacist Refuse Psychotropic Drugs?
Would that be okay? Why are people so damn scared of the fundies in this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC