Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Substandard US medical donations rejected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:01 PM
Original message
Substandard US medical donations rejected
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-12/10/content_502258.htm

"China will return three containers of substandard medical supplies donated by US charity organizations, which included stained bedding, used surgical clothes and expired equipment.

<snip>

Some of the medical equipment had a use-by date of 1998, while others items were found to have passed their probationary period after three checks in November by the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine and Beijing Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau. Dirty quilts and clothes were also found, the paper said.

<snip>

The Associated Press on Friday quoted an anonymous official from the federation as saying the donations came from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Salt Lake City, Utah. The organization was not available for comment. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good gawd, if they sent that to China
what do those stingy bastards send to Africa?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bet half the shit was MADE IN CHINA, too
You know they will try to spin this as ungrateful heathens rejecting their charity...like who wouldn't be thrilled to sleep on someone's piss stained mattress??

The mind fucking BOGGLES, sometimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. well, at least we didn't send blankets infected with smallpox...this time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Evidently the Chinese are less trusting than the Indians were.
They've had more history with our off and on corrupt administrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the Chinese will send us some defective military equipment
That would serve us right. Good 'Ole Christian religions doing some compassionate evil. An eye for an eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:24 PM
Original message
dupe...sorrry
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 10:26 PM by Auntie Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe the Chinese will send us some defective military equipment
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 10:24 PM by Auntie Bush
That would serve us right. Good 'Ole Christian religions doing some compassionate evil. An eye for an eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. wonder how much of that shit was actually MADE in China . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. dollars to donuts this is a roundabout way to the ole "corporate dumping"
of the 80s - where a company would sell products no longer deemed safe in the US to third world countries... such as bad baby formula and the like. Rather than take a total loss - they would sell it more cheaply or "dump" it - knowing there were health and safety risks, but not caring.

Bet in this case some LSD businessperson, or a business affiliated with the LSD - made a big "donation" and received a nice big tax deduction (thus getting "value") for these goods, which the charity then distributed. So now the charity, rather than the business, gets the bad press for the dumping... which will be spun as "good intentions" as opposed to the negative press that corporate dumping gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC