It appears that La. has absentee voting both in person and by mail, and that absentee by mail is available to those temporarily (we hope) out of state.
http://www.sos.louisiana.gov/elections/misc/RS_18_1303.pdfB. By mail. The following persons, otherwise qualified to vote, who expect to be out of the parish on election day, may vote absentee by mail upon
meeting the requirements of this Chapter:
(1) A member of the United States Service, as defined in R.S. 18:1302, and his spouse and dependents.
(2) A student, instructor, or professor in an institution of higher learning located outside the parish in which he is qualified to vote and who lives
outside of said parish by reason thereof, and his spouse and any dependent accompanying and residing with him.
(3) A minister, priest, rabbi, or other member of the clergy assigned to a religious post outside the parish in which he is registered and his spouse and
any dependents accompanying and residing with him.
(4) A person who is or who expects to be temporarily outside the territorial limits of the state or absent from the parish in which he is qualified to vote
during the absentee voting period and on election day....Still and all, an absentee election of this magnitude would be unprecedented anywhere (except Ore. which conducts most elections by mail), plus it makes your head hurt to think how you would mount a campaign, particularly for City Council which is on the ballot along with the mayoralty, spread across several states.
And then, especially if there is a "gold rush" of candidates seeking to capitalize on Mayor Nagin's perceived weakness and/or the temporary (again, we hope) demographic shift, we would be most likely looking at a runoff 30 days afterwards... :eyes:
Two imperatives are clashing here: 1) The machinery of democracy is not to be tampered with for partisan purposes, and 2) Systematic disenfranchisement of poor voters and voters of color is always unacceptable. Ordinarily this type of situation ends up in the courts...
...which brings me to Nightmare Scenario #2: This thing bounces around in the courts, most likely the federal courts, since voting is involved (poor, put-upon, aggrieved affluent whites suing under the Voting Rights Act?! :sarcasm: ), ends up in N.O.'s own Fifth Circuit, the second most conservative after Richmond's 4th, maybe even moves on to the Supremes (think
Bush v. Gore ) -- and we end up having to hold it on Feb. 4 after all, with maybe only a couple of weeks' notice.