Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: More Blacks Live With Pollution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:58 PM
Original message
AP: More Blacks Live With Pollution
AP: More Blacks Live With Pollution
By DAVID PACE
Associated Press Writer

December 13, 2005, 12:37 PM EST

CHICAGO -- An Associated Press analysis of a little-known government research project shows that black Americans are 79 percent more likely than whites to live in neighborhoods where industrial pollution is suspected of posing the greatest health danger.

Residents in neighborhoods with the highest pollution scores also tend to be poorer, less educated and more often unemployed than those elsewhere in the country, AP found.

"Poor communities, frequently communities of color but not exclusively, suffer disproportionately," said Carol Browner, who headed the Environmental Protection Agency during the Clinton administration when the scoring system was developed. "If you look at where our industrialized facilities tend to be located, they're not in the upper middle class neighborhoods."
(snip)

President Clinton ordered the government in 1993 to ensure equality in protecting Americans from pollution, but more than a decade later, factory emissions still disproportionately place minorities and the poor at risk, AP found.
(snip/...)

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-unhealthy-air,0,1349196.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's called environmental racism - another issue Kerry talked about often
for years that the media editted out of their campaign coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanks for posting the term. It's very helpful.
Toxic Gumbo
In the "Cancer Belt," Louisiana Black Communities
Fight Industrial Polluters
By Ron Nixon
Special to SeeingBlack.com

A string of lights illuminate the night sky over the rural, 100-mile stretch between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana. During the day, these lights give way to clouds of smoke that rise from the giant mechanical structures that dot the area's landscape. The structures belong to 138 companies that comprise a virtually who's who of the petrochemical industry: Texaco, Borden, Occidental Chemical, Kaiser Aluminum, Chevron, IMC-Agrico, Dow, Dupont to name a few.

State and local officials call this progress. The petrochemical industry, they say, contributes billions of dollars and jobs to the state and local economies. Residents who live in the areas nearby the industry call it another name: "Cancer Alley." For them, the area's industry has yielded few jobs, destroyed the natural environment and brought a host of illnesses they attribute to emissions from the plants. Residents say the area is but one more example of what they call environmental racism—the targeting of communities of color for undesirable facilities.

A number of studies suggest that such claims are not unfounded. Nationally, a 1987 study by the United Church of Christ's Commission on Racial Justice found Blacks were four times were more likely to live in areas with toxic and hazardous waste sites than Whites. A 1992 investigation by the National Law Journal found that when government does enforce environmental regulation and fine companies, fines are much higher in White communities than in Black ones. In Louisiana, reports by the US Commission on Civil Rights and an unreleased report by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region Six, have raised concerns about the location of chemical plants and their possible impact on the health of their neighbors, who are primarily people of color.
(snip)
http://www.seeingblack.com/x040901/toxic_gumbo.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~snip~
Convent is a lower-income, rural, 84% African American community along the Mississippi River in St. James Parish, Louisiana. n15 Located in the eighty-five-mile area commonly referred <*39> to as "Cancer Alley" or the "Chemical Corridor," Convent is a highly toxic community even by Louisiana and Chemical Corridor standards. In 1995 industrial facilities in the Convent area emitted 251,179 pounds of toxic air pollution per square mile: over sixty-seven times the amount per square mile emitted for the rest of the parish, the third most polluted parish in the state; ninety-three times more than the amount emitted per square mile for the highly-polluted Chemical Corridor; 129 times more than the average for Louisiana, described as easily the most polluted state in America on a square mile or per capita basis; and 658 times more than the U.S. average. n16 A person could spend half a day in Convent and be exposed to almost as much toxic air pollution as the average American breathes in a year.

Unfortunately, industrial development has not resulted in a noticeable economic improvement for many Convent residents. The median annual income for the Convent area is only $ 11,476, compared to a median income for the parish of $ 23,000 and a national average of $ 30,000. n17 Almost half of the households in Convent have incomes less than $ 15,000 per year, less than 50% of the children graduate from high school, and unemployment runs as high as 60%. n18 Convent is a classic example of a local community <*40> suffering the burdens of industrial pollution while the economic benefits of the industry flow outside the community to non-resident employees and distant corporate officers and shareholders.
(snip/...)
http://projectcensored.org/publications/2000/9.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Given the proportion of whites that no longer live in the cities this does
not surprise me at all. In the suburbs there is relatively little pollution compared to the cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does anyone remember seeing a long tv news program on CBS
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 01:17 PM by Judi Lynn
several years ago concerning a large rural poor area in Louisiana which was entirely poisoned by, I think, mercury emissions from a local factory, and the unconscionable lethal effects on the black population?

It was a horrendous view of a corporation operating without the slightest modification long after it knew it was killing the people in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a good example from one Louisiana town.
A small neighborhood in Bossier City, Louisiana has some of the highest levels of chemical contamination, cancers and birth defects ever documented in the United States, according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientists. The Lincoln Creosote plant is now a Superfund site on the National Priorities List of the most hazardous sites in the country. It was operated in a 20 acre field next to a residential area from 1935 to 1969 by several different owners and operators, producing telephone poles and railroad ties. The wood was pressure treated with creosote, copper-chromium arsenate and pentachlorophenol (PCP) and hung out to dry. Eventually, two large creosote ponds formed leaving arsenic and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as deep as 15 feet in the ground. Large residential neighborhoods border the Lincoln Creosote facility to the north, northeast, south and west… According to Dr. Patricia Williams, the high incidence of cancers and birth defects in Bossier City was probably caused by the contamination in the ground, air and water. Dr. Williams found that the incidence of leukemia from the late 1970s to the mid-1990s is as much as 40 times higher than normal populations, the rate varies depending on the type of leukemia. Breast cancer incidence is as much as five times higher than normal. Incidences of birth defects are 300 percent higher that those recorded during a comparable time period in Osaka, Japan which is near Hiroshima where an atomic bomb was dropped in 1945 to end World War II.

-Marie Marzi, "Creosote Contaminates Louisiana Community for Generations,"
Environment News Service 5 Sep 01


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stepup2 Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Blacks in the US also are more likely
to receive inferior health care services.

To say the the discussion of environmental racism has stalled is the very definition of understatement. The discussion has yet to meaningfully begin, imo, among public health experts on the relationship of exposure to environmental toxins and ill health. This issue gets bantered about, but when it comes time for the research, the chicken or egg argument derails the research from taking the baby steps on which a body of research is built over time.

Currently, the issue seems to crack along the genetic explanation fault lines. It is "safer" and easier to blame an individual's bad genes as the basis for "their" ill health, rather than try to tease out the larger more complex causality chain which may directly link exposure to toxins and disease outcomes.

Funding flows from the major chem companies to schools of public health; the very schools places charged with training the nations leaders to research health effects of exposure to environmental toxins. This has a chilling effect and quells appropriate research methodology


Here are a few links to more information on the topic of environmental racism.

http://www.ejrc.cau.edu/

http://www.ejnet.org/ej/

Here is a link to a jump off point regarding toxin exposure and disease

http://www.steingraber.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thank you for posting the links.They're well worth taking time to read.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stepup2 Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are welcome!
Here is a link to a story that sheds a little lit on the history of this issue.


http://www.arc.org/C_Lines/CLArchive/story3_2_03.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Some media had just started to notice right before Bush took office.
Since then, NADA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a coincidence
I came across this press release about a study going on in Washington, DC, about environmental causes of childhood cancer.

http://www.georgetownuniversityhospital.org/body.cfm?id=15&UserAction=PressDetails&action=detail&ref=111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC