Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Votes to Toughen Laws on Immigration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:19 PM
Original message
House Votes to Toughen Laws on Immigration
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601814_pf.html>

House Votes to Toughen Laws on Immigration
One Setback for Bush: No Guest-Worker Plan

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 17, 2005; A01



The House last night passed tough immigration legislation to build vast border fences, force employers to verify the legality of their workers and tighten security on the nation's frontier, but it rebuffed President Bush's entreaties to include avenues for foreign workers to gain legal employment.

The bill passed 239 to 182, with 36 Democrats joining 203 Republicans to vote yes. Seventeen Republicans, 164 Democrats and one independent opposed the measure.

The bill was designed to demonstrate to voters a new resolve on border security before the House adjourns for the year. But it also revealed deep divisions in the Republican Party between lawmakers who agree with Bush that a strict clampdown alone cannot work without a guest-worker program for noncitizens, and others resolutely opposed to any plan that would keep undocumented workers flowing into the country.

Bush had made the immigration issue a top item on his domestic agenda, hoping a carrot-and-stick approach to dealing with a growing number of illegal immigrants and undocumented workers would satisfy conservatives while advancing his efforts to reach out to Latino voters. But in the face of unyielding conservative opposition in the House, leaders abandoned the president's guest-worker plan, which would have allowed foreign workers into the country under temporary work visas.

The House bill was adamantly opposed by an unusual coalition of business lobbies; ethnic groups, such as the National Council of La Raza; religious organizations; and labor unions that contend the measure is too harsh on illegal immigrants and imposes unworkable requirements on employers. Supporters -- including the House Republican leadership -- are convinced their measure has the ardent support of constituents fed up with illegal aliens flooding through the border. The Senate will probably consider a very different version next year that includes a guest-worker provision.

More...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601814_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the one that makes it a felony?
I read the article and I couldn't find anything. However, I found other sources that referred to the same bill with regards to making it a felony.

At any rate, this is despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why is this despicable?
It is a bill to enforce laws.

If you don't want a border, then petition Congress to do away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, I dunno....
"Opponents from both parties said the House had approved a punitive measure that could criminalize not only undocumented workers but also their families and employers, while doing nothing to bring some 11 million illegal aliens out of the shadows and into lawful society."

We are now treating people like stray dogs. That doesn't bother you? Please....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is just the House version of the bill
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 12:51 PM by Leilani
The Senate will provide a guest worker program, & they will combine the 2 versions.

The Senate is owned by Corporate interests. They won't let their supporters down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm aware of that
The Senate may provide a guest worker program. However, even IF they do, the House has said it will oppose it.

"The future of the immigration bill is unclear. In the Senate, bipartisan support is growing for legislation co-authored by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) that would combine border enforcement measures with a guest-worker program. But a large number of House conservatives say they will never accept such a measure."
(from the same WaPo article)

The House is full of anti-immigrant reactionaries. They won't let their twisted aims go to the wayside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dems say they want to go after employers
This bill was opposed by all the business interests, because it will be tough on companies.

Why did so few Dems support this bill?

Someone said sarcastically to me, "Yeah, they're the party of the people! Right!"

If there are unlimited workers, people at the botton wage scale will continue to be hurt. Why hire an American when you can pay much less to illegals, plus no taxes, no bennies, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. We do
However, the businesses pay a fine; the immigrants get deported. Businesses could easily make up a $25,000 quite quickly by using undocumented workers. Fair? Hardly.

The fact is that no one goes after businesses, it is the workers that suffer. This will hardly change with these new measures. What we need is to target the employers, not the employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't understand what they plan for Mexican illegals.
"The measure would end the "catch and release" policy for immigrants other than Mexicans who are caught entering the country illegally and then released with a court date."

So they are still going to do the catch and release with Mexicans? How can they tell the difference? I mean, isn't it pretty easy to get Mexican documents saying you are a Mexican citizen? Lou Dobbs had a show on how you can get Mexican documents. Soooo, I'm confused about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. House OKs bill to build fences along border
House Republicans overcame deep divisions Friday to approve a sweeping border security bill that would crack down on undocumented immigrants by erecting fences and setting stiff fines for employers.

"Securing our nation's borders is an imperative, and this bill does it," said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Democrats were angered at several measures in the bill, including one that would make felons of 11 million people in this country without papers and subject them to criminal, not civil, laws.

"This is driven more by partisan politics than sound policy," said Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-El Paso, a former Border Patrol section chief.



http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/politics/stories/MYSA121705.01A.immigration_bill.223a9124.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Unreal. Nancy said it all
"Republicans have proposed a bill that is an abomination of the worst kind. It calls upon the worst political and most craven impulses," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. a simple solutin from simple minds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. might have know Sensenbrenner was involved in this stupidity.


"Securing our nation's borders is an imperative, and this bill does it," said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. this is BS!
what makes them think a f*cking fence is going to keep anyone out? These people swim across the Rio Grande just to get here!! Why would they let a little fence stop them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. gee, what will business say? do?--maybe fly them over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. My thoughts exactly.
Think of the meat packing industry. Think of agriculture. Think of restaurants and hospitality. Think of all those Republicans who rely on undocumented aliens to tend their yards, clean their houses, and so forth.

Not saying all of that is right and proper, mind you, but all those industries have a wake up call coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Can you say exploding prison population?
They've probably already planned and begun the tunnels. The only thing of value in this legislation is fines for employers. Unfortunately, I suspect that will quickly and quietly become another unenforced law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. the potential for 11 MILLION felons. oh my this is real bad.



...Democrats were angered at several measures in the bill, including one that would make felons of 11 million people in this country without papers and subject them to criminal, not civil, laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Everyday I wake up in a new country
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Never underestimate the stupidity of Republicans
This has been tried before with Operation Gatekeeper.

That one actually ended up increasing undocumented immigration- by making it so that people felt like they had to stay- rather than simply go back home when their seasonal work was over.

Not only did they stay- they brought their extended families!

The INS knows this well- but as I mentioned, never underestimate the ability of Republicans to waste billions to try to implement simple minded solutions to complicated problem- even after their solutions are proven to be a failures- or even create more serious problems than existed before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. lets play devils advocate
what is wrong with building a fence to curtail the mass entry of illegals into the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Several things.
One right off the top of my head: we're a nation of immigrants. Your forbears came here from somewhere else, and so did mine.

Another right off the top of my head: it's a very expensive placebo. Won't achieve anything but spending money.

A third: like it or not, several major industries have grown dependent on this source of labor. We aren't going to like the backwash frrm this.

That's three things right off the top. There's many more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. I'm going to say something unpopular, even on DU, but someone
has to say it. The discussion would not be complete without that one poster who points out that quite a few Mexicans are simply descendants of "indians" who were driven out of this country ages ago by imperialist white folks back in the day. Deservedly, they should be allowed to come back.

Btw, this country was fucking founded on the principle of immigration.

This might be racist to say, but there was a Rage Against the Machine t-shirt that said, "Who are you calling an immigrant, Pilgrim?" I'm finding myself more and more inclined to say that lately, especially since I found out I am "enough" Native American Indian that my mother was able to change my race.

Beside those points, I'd like to leave everybody who reads this post with the lyrics to a song that may enlighten you as to why I think this fence building idea is an expensive nationalist socialist endeavor that wreaks of gentrification.

"Signs"

And the sign said "Long-haired freaky people need not apply"
So I tucked my hair up under my hat and I went in to ask him why
He said "You look like a fine upstanding young man, I think you'll do"
So I took off my hat, I said "Imagine that. Huh! Me workin' for you!"
Whoa-oh-oh

Signs, signs, everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign?

And the sign said anybody caught trespassin' would be shot on sight
So I jumped on the fence and-a yelled at the house,
"Hey! What gives you the right?"
"To put up a fence to keep me out or to keep Mother Nature in"
"If God was here he'd tell you to your face, Man, you're some kinda sinner"

Sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign?

Now, hey you, mister, can't you read?
You've got to have a shirt and tie to get a seat
You can't even watch, no you can't eat
You ain't supposed to be here
The sign said you got to have a membership card to get inside
Ugh!

And the sign said, "Everybody welcome. Come in, kneel down and pray"
But when they passed around the plate at the end of it all,
I didn't have a penny to pay
So I got me a pen and a paper and I made up my own little sign
I said, "Thank you, Lord, for thinkin' 'bout me.
I'm alive and doin' fine."
Wooo!

Sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign?

Sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Sign
Sign, sign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. There were some.
There weren't all that many. The Spanish didn't really try hard--there were some that sought refuge in Mexico from New Mexico over near the Texas/NMex border (using current geographical terms), but not really in California, Arizona, or Texas.

The O'odham straddle the border, but I'm not sure they weren't there long before the colonial powers came in and set up Mexico or drew the current borders.

The Spanish policy was mostly one of convert-in-situ and make into good colonial/Catholic citizens. It failed rather spectacularly, at least in Texas, and lead to the presidio system, mostly because tribes were rather astute. Why convert, and why give trade/land concessions that didn't make sense. They also did some things that, in hindsight, were rather stupid, of course.

The Texan and US policy in Texas was mostly drive them north. The SW of Texas wasn't heavily populated. I'm unaware of any drive south in California or Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. The Great Wall of... America?!?! WTF?
So I'm confused.. are we gonna be the next China or the next Germany with our shitty wall? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Hmmm..I never knew Sensenbreather owned a fence company!
bout the only logical explanation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Just imagine how much this'll cost. Talk about the mother of all pork!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroubleMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!....um I mean Mr Fox, put up this wall!
What a retarded and xenophobic idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. One has to wonder if they are trying to keep them out
or us in?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Sooooo...we're gonna build one along the Canadian border too?
What a crock.

"We're a nation of immigrants," my wife just remarked.

I guess we used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Here's a quote from the article
"Perhaps the time will come for a limited foreign worker program," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, "but that is only after we have secured our borders and put the interests of American workers first."

Oh yeah, the Pugs are SOOOOOOOOOO GODDAMNED CONCERNED about the interests of American workers, aren't they?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Berlin Wall anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. And we see how well THAT worked...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Shouldn't that money be spent in New Orleans?
Why is there money for a new Berlin Wall, but no money for housing displaced Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC