Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Possibility of US military presence raises fears in Paraguay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:50 AM
Original message
Possibility of US military presence raises fears in Paraguay
Possibility of US military presence raises fears in Paraguay
Visit by Rumsfeld stirs speculation on military base
By Patrick J. McDonnell, Los Angeles Times | December 25, 2005

ASUNCION, Paraguay -- Are the Americans coming?

That question continues to reverberate in this sleepy capital four months after a ''courtesy call" visit by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld unleashed a torrent of speculation about Washington's reputed ''secret agenda."

US officials have categorically denied having plans for a military base here, describing the episode as a misunderstanding over ongoing US-Paraguayan military exercises.

Despite the denials, talk of detachments of Marines taking up residence in this nation in the heart of South America has entered the continent's political discourse.

''No Yanqui Troops in Paraguay!" read banners hoisted by protesters at last month's Summit of the Americas in Argentina.
(snip/...)

http://www.boston.com/news/world/latinamerica/articles/2005/12/25/possibility_of_us_military_presence_raises_fears_in_paraguay/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. South america should be thinking about it.
With Hugo Chavez sitting on a load of oil, and the new guy in Bolivia, you can bet that if history has meaning Bushites have its eyes on what's going on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Paraguay has the world's largest fresh water aquifer
and it sits beneath 600,000 hectares of arid land purchased, since 1999, by Bush family patron Sun Myung Moon. The Chaco is also a strategic point for the region's drugs and arms trade.

From Where in South America is Sun Myung Moon?, an excerpt from an Irish Times story entitled "Paraguayans accuse Moon of carving out an empire of smack":

"Since 1999, Rev Moon has built his personal empire which begins on the marshy banks of the River Paraguay and stretches beyond the hazy, level horizon through 600,000 hectares of arid land - equivalent to more than two Luxembourgs - punctuated by solitary clusters of withered trees and sad bushes which struggle desperately for air.

The scorching sun beats relentlessly on one of Latin America's most desolate zones. It is here in the northern province of Chaco, directly above the GuaranI aquifer, the largest resource of fresh drinking water in the world, where Moon's associates claim he wishes to build an ecological paradise.

Nevertheless, national Senator Domingo Laino sees a different pattern in Moon's acquisitions. "There are two principal branches to Moon's interest in Paraguay," he said, "control of the largest fresh drinking water source in the world and control of the narcotics business", which is so prevalent in this area. "President Lula told me that Brazil took serious measures to curb Moon a few years back as it became evident that he was buying up the border between our two countries," said the senator.

Allegations from local law enforcement officials support this claim. The so-called Dr Montiel, Paraguay's drugs tsar from 1976-89, said: "The fact that they came and bought in Chaco and on both sides of the Brazilian border is very telling. It is an enormously strategic point in both the narcotics and arms trades and indeed the available intelligence clearly shows that the Moon sect is involved in both these enterprises." "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I fear that as troops are withdrawn fron Iraq that they will be sent to
squelch democracies in Latin America as they did in Haiti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're probably right. Bush may not feel he's quite a man if he doesn't
spill Latin American blood in our hemisphere, just like previous Republican Presidents. They really like to reinforce the authority of the European descended, Republican-friendly elite, and it doesn't bother their consciences whatsoever when entire villages are destroyed, and whatever survivors remain made homeless.

They called them "leftists," communists, etc. before. Now they'll just call them "terrorists," or all of the above. I think it's a race to see if the people of this hemisphere can secure the unity they need before he strikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Why send troops when we can hire and train mercenaries?
It is well worth one's time to read this entire article...Dark times are approaching South America, and I suspect Cheney's secret energy meetings covered this hot topic extensively while Rummy took copious notes.


Dark Armies, Secret Bases, and Rummy




by Conn Hallinan


November 24, 2005

Foreign Policy In Focus - 2005-11-21


It would be easy to make fun of President Bush's recent fiasco at the 4th Summit of the Americas in Mar del Plata, Argentina. His grand plan for a free trade zone reaching from the Artic Circle to Tierra del Fuego was soundly rejected by nations fed up with the economic and social chaos wrought by neoliberalism. At a press conference, South American journalists asked him rude questions about Karl Rove. And the President ended the whole debacle by uttering what may be the most trenchant observation the man has ever made on Latin America: “Wow! Brazil is big!”

But there is nothing amusing about an enormous U.S. base less than 120 miles from the Bolivian border, or the explosive growth of U.S.-financed mercenary armies that are doing everything from training the military in Paraguay and Ecuador to calling in air attacks against guerillas in Colombia. Indeed, it is feeling a little like the run up to the ‘60s and ‘70s, when Washington-sponsored military dictatorships dominated most of the continent, and dark armies ruled the night.

U.S. Special Forces began arriving this past summer at Paraguay's Mariscal Estigarribia air base, a sprawling complex built in 1982 during the reign of dictator Alfredo Stroessner. Argentinean journalists who got a peek at the place say the airfield can handle B-52 bombers and Galaxy C-5 cargo planes. It also has a huge radar system, vast hangers, and can house up to 16,000 troops. The air base is larger than the international airport at the capital city, Asuncion .

Some 500 special forces arrived July 1 for a three-month counterterrorism training exercise, code named Operation Commando Force 6.

<snip>

The base is crawling with U.S. civilians—many of them retired military—working for Military Professional Resources Inc., Virginia Electronics, DynCorp, Lockheed Martin (the world's largest arms maker), Northrop Grumman, TRW, and dozens of others.

It was U.S. intelligence agents working out of Manta who fingered Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia leader Ricardo Palmera last year, and several leaders of the U.S.-supported coup against Haitian President Bertram Aristide spent several months there before launching the 2004 coup that exiled Aristide to South Africa.

“Privatizing” war is not only the logical extension of the Bush administration's mania for contracting everything out to the private sector; it also shields the White House's activities from the U.S. Congress. “My complaint about the use of private contractors,” says U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsy (D-IL), “is their ability to fly under the radar to avoid accountability.”

<more>

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=HAL20051124&articleId=1322
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. me head hurts...
big time. I mean we are talking the whole fucking world here...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have read about the 'intersection' of Paraguay, Brazil,....
...Argentina and Uruguay ...not a straightaway border but look at a map....is a hotbed of smuggling, espionage of all types, general lawlessness and....terrorist cells.
....not that this justifies u.s. troops anywhere, but the article made it seem like no man's land. I will try to find it.
....the way it was described....you wouldn't want to be there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Is the terrorist angle just an exaggerated neocon talking point?
Edited on Sun Dec-25-05 05:53 PM by BrotherBuzz

What is the U.S. Military Doing in Paraguay?



By Benjamin Dangl

8/01/05


<snip>

“Terrorism Networks in Triple Border Region”


The U.S. interest in Paraguay makes sense for other reasons as well; the triple border between Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil has been long been rumored to be an “Islamic terrorist training ground.” According to New Yorker reporter, Jeffrey Goldberg, the area is “one of the most lawless places in the world…also the center of Middle Eastern terrorism in South America.” Goldberg reported that Hamas and Al Qaeda are associated with the terrorists in this region. (10)

As the U.S. government was gearing up for a war in Iraq, Goldberg also wrote an article that purportedly linked Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The article was gratefully used by the Bush administration to further their argument for war. Critics believe Goldberg often forms a hypothesis and then goes out to try and prove it. Veteran muckraker, Alexander Cockburn found various inaccuracies in the article linking Al Qaeda to Hussein and wrote that “Goldberg once served in Israel's armed forces, which may or may not be a guide to his political agenda.” (11)

As we’ve seen in Iraq, the Bush administration understands that the “war on terror” can serve as a great excuse to claim natural resources. The U.S. military activity in Paraguay combined with the triple border terrorist theory and the gas reserves in a precarious Bolivia, sound like a recipe for another U.S. “democracy spreading” bonanza

<end>

http://upsidedownworld.org/US-in-Paraguay.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps with Manta in its Mind, the U.S. Eyes Paraguay
Dec. 9 2005

Press Release - Council On Hemispheric Affairs
Perhaps with Manta in its Mind, the U.S. Eyes Paraguay
This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associates Julian Armington and You Lee Kim

• Initial reports that 400-500 U.S. troops would be operating in Paraguay at once were misleading.

• Washington's intensified interest in previously all-but-ignored Paraguay invites questions regarding U.S. intentions for the country and the region.

• Paraguay, which has long been thought of as a terrorist haven, may be the next front in Washington's "War on Terror."

• Could Mariscal Estigarribia be the new Manta?

On June 1, the Paraguayan Congress signed off on an agreement bringing over 400 U.S. troops to that country for “joint training and humanitarian operations.” The deal, which is initially slated to last 18 months, sparked criticism and speculation among both watchdog groups and officials of neighboring South American governments, regarding possible motives behind the presence of U.S. troops in such large numbers in a country long renowned for its crime, corruption and contrabanding. The first of what will be 13 such detachments numbering less than 50 U.S. military personnel arrived on July 1, with a new contingent of 45 soldiers following on July 24. COHA was soon able to establish that the initial reports that 400 troops would be arriving in Paraguay referred to the aggregate number of U.S. troops being sent to the country over the 18 months. This confusion in the size of troop levels to be deployed had been distorted by the lack of clear information coming from the Pentagon regarding U.S. military actions in Paraguay through 2006.
(snip)

The White House’s gradually increasing focus on militarizing the region shows that the U.S. remains better prepared to use force and the threat of intervention, instead of constructive diplomacy to resolve outstanding bilateral issues. During the Cold War, the U.S.’ justification for its interventions in Latin America was the fear of communism; in the 1990s, it was the War on Drugs; and now the “Global War on Terrorism” is the central argument to ensure that American boots remain on the ground in the region. Whatever argument Washington chooses to present, it is clear that it wants to make certain that it is in control of its “backyard” by any and all means.
(snip/...)

http://www.harolddoan.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7291
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Paraguay is the launching point for an invasion of Bolivia
Natural-gas rich region of Bolivia is right across the border from Paraguay, and Bolivians just elected a Socialist as President, Evo Morales.

Rumsfeld threatened Bolivians if they elected Morales when he was in Paraguay, and Condi Rice has said the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. the Gringos can expect support
in Santa Cruz, already they are demanding "autonomy". Bolivia aits on enormous natural gas reserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Chaco War II, coming right up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh good ... let's piss off another country
there aren't enough people in the world who hate us! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clara T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. 124 miles from Bolivia's southeast frontier- Natural Gas Reserves
Edited on Sun Dec-25-05 10:05 PM by Clara T
U.S. Military Eyes Paraguay

Rumors of an American base raise fears that the United States is there to stay
By Adam Saytanides

Then the rumors began appearing in the Latin American press: The United States was moving to establish a military base at Mariscal Estigarribia, a town in Paraguay just 124 miles from Bolivia's southeast frontier and within easy striking distance of Bolivian natural gas reserves, the largest in the Americas. Anywhere from 400 to 500 U.S. troops were said to be arriving.

In late July, Brazil reportedly launched military maneuvers along the Paraguayan border, a move seen as an expression of Brazilian discontent with Paraguay. More vocally, Brazil's foreign minister Celso Amorin drew a line in the sand: "Paraguay must understand that the choice is between Mercosur and other possible partners."

Brazil and Argentina lord over Paraguay in the Mercosur trading bloc with a dominant import-export relationship. They don't want to see their leverage compromised if Paraguay gains preferred access to the U.S. market for its textiles (hinted at recently) and drops out of the Mercosur trade partnership.

But Bolivia has the most to fear from a U.S. military base in Paraguay. With national elections slated for December 5, the Andean nation is expected to become the next Latin American flashpoint. Since October 2003, widespread indigenous peasant uprisings have ousted two presidents. Quechua and Aymara Indians make up the majority of the Bolivian populace, and they're pressuring the central government to halt the forced eradication of coca cultivation and to nationalize the country's natural gas reserves. Evo Morales, presidential candidate for the Movement Towards Socialism, or MAS party, made a meteoric rise onto the international political stage by supporting these goals, in open defiance of Washington. Considered by many analysts to be the frontrunner, Morales' main competition is former president Jorge Quiroga Ramírez, the preferred candidate of the United States.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2381/

Corporate America no like Evo



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. fearNot,We're here to fight TERRORISM! I'm clearingYourMind of ALL Anxiety


peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clara T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. For the files
You might want this:

Hastert/Bush Whacked Out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. lol


added, thanks for sharing :hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush wont let Bolivia nationalize Enron's natural gas pipeline. War drums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC