Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Klayman gets the Cheney Energy papers....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:27 PM
Original message
Klayman gets the Cheney Energy papers....
and guess - just guess - what's in them?

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that documents turned over by the Commerce Department, under court order as a result of Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit concerning the activities of the Cheney Energy Task Force, contain a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as 2 charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts.” The documents, which are dated March 2001, are available on the Internet at: www.JudicialWatch.org.

The Saudi Arabian and United Arab Emirates (UAE) documents likewise feature a map of each country’s oilfields, pipelines, refineries and tanker terminals. There are supporting charts with details of the major oil and gas development projects in each country that provide information on the projects, costs, capacity, oil company and status or completion date.

Did The Thug Cabal have plans beyond Iraq? Looks like they had a whole shopping list, if you ask me.

-as

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. what was that date again??? March 2001...hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sham Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. March 2001...
exactly one year before the Boy-King said, "Fuck Saddam, we're taking him out." And exactly two years before we fucking tried to take Saddam out. Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegenerationMan Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
116. Cheney is toast
Cheney is done, stick a fork in him.

IMAGINE PRESIDENT KERRY!!
1971 Peace Rally where Lennon introduced Kerry

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
118. Who was at the meeting? Where are the rest of the documents?
This is only part of the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. HOLY FUCK!!!!!!
Great find, Stranger :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:40 PM
Original message
The press release dated july 17,2003
Why hasn't the media picked it up? No Buzzflash...no peek. Peaks my cynicism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
51. well, I'm emailing this thread to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itascapark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. So
just HOW BIG does everyone think this is, and will it get covered by the cable stations? Seems to me this is a huge problem (yet another) for Bushco...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't think the docs would be turned over for MONTHS yet.......
Even Klayman said he thought Jan 2004 (after the ct of appeals affirmed the DC ruling that Cheney had to turn the docs over).

Whoa.....

A shopping list indeed.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow! Klayman did it!
So cheney's "Energy Papers" contain Iraqi oil fields!

I bet those Soldier's Loved Ones who died in Iraq would love to know that!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Yeah Zid, can you imagine as a wife, husband, father, mother
reading this? Very sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. I know it is very sad! I just wish they would have believed...
The People who were Protesting the Attack on Iraq and not the known liar; bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
101. This should be HUGE!!!!
We must search these docs carefully and press the press to follow up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oreocat Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like more trouble for B*
More drips....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. that is sick
can you imagine what was said in those meetings ?

Evil, Greedy scumbags.....i cant imagine a young soldier sacrificing his life for this gang of crooks. It looks like it wasnt "Saddam was a bad guy" or "mass graves" or "spreading democracy"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Drips nothing - this is a damn flood.
Now the questioning begins: who provided these maps and oil infrastructure info to Cheney?

Who was on the guest list for secret meetings?

Who on said list is no working to pump oil out of Iraq?

How are the foreign interests who may have had an interest in Iraqi oil being treated pre and post-war?

And finally: where do we go from here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Mari had this posted on her "energy paper" thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. That is priceless. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Original message
OMG! Zid, that is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbwarming Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. The field maps and such are common knowledge
available in Oil and Gas Journal, etc
http://membres.lycos.fr/middle_east/Radoicic-1986-01.htm
http://geology.cr.usgs.gov/energy/WorldEnergy/OF97-470B/arabGmap.html

And bidders for some lease blocks (maybe all?) are also routinely discussed in these sorts of publications, but _WHO_ was at the damn meetings, and _WHY_ were they discussing Iraqi fields... Those are interesting and as yet unanswered questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. This is supposed to expand publicly obtainable knowledge.
Isn't that correct?

I mean, these papers are more than just a collection of maps. These maps are supposed to have notes and correspondence germaine to them. Wasn't that what the fight was all about? Executive priviledge versus public dissemination?

I am just asking. The potentials of this revelation have me salivating. The maps help the case of us guys in the white hats. The notes are the ace up the sleeve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
103. Are "suitors" routinely discussed?
This shit is getting ridiculous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbwarming Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #103
125. Yeah, they are.

A couple of examples:
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/watch/Policywatch/policywatch1997/283.htm

http://www.converger.com/eiacab/iraq.htm
As of June 1997, there reportedly were almost 60 foreign oil companies from a wide variety of countries that were in discussions with the Iraqi government (see table at the end of this report). U.S. firms which have held talks on Iraqi field development include: Amoco, Arco, Chevron, Coastal, Conoco, Exxon, Mobil, Occidental, and Texaco. Iraq plans to offer new fields to foreign oil companies through production sharing contracts (PSC), joint ventures, and service contracts. Initially, Iraq plans to offer up to 25 new fields to foreign companies. Ten of these fields, with a production potential of 2.7 MMBD, are slated for development under PSCs with foreign companies. Four of these fields are located in southern Iraq and, with a combined production potential of 2.1 MMBD, represent the cornerstone of Iraq's post-sanction development plans. These four "giant" southern fields are Majnoon, West Qurna, Nahr Umar, and Halfaya.

PS. Cheney is a criminal. He still hasn't released the attendees or minutes for these task force meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. Provocative questions Oz...VG!
I think I have seen this "part of the show" before. <watergate>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
95. The 9/11 report is due out in a week or two, right?
Helen Thomas is right - worst pResident in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxglove1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Holy shit!!
We have GOT to send this out to the talking heads. BUSTED BIGTIME!!

:bounce:

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Augspies Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!
That is the sound of this whole fiasco blowing up in their faces.

Interesting isn't it how a National Energy Assement would have maps of Iraqi, and Saudi oil fields.

Hehehehehehehehehehehe

:hurts: oh yes it does. I bet Cheney blows an O-ring tommorow.

Jeremy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. Jeremy - ROTFLMAO! Cheny didn't look very well today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. YIKES!!!!
these maps are like a PNAC travel brochure...

I advise everyone to not only save this JW page to their hard drives, but download and save these documents too! Just in case!!!


these devils are en route back to hell, and JW just found a shortcut :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. Travel Brochure? Now that is good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm disappointed -- no Afghanistan maps
I still expect to see the pipeline plans...to Enron's Dabhol plant in India.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Exactly - I feel sure the Dabhol pipeline is in there someplace
keep looking, Mr. Klayman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
54. Yeah, a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs? Which door do you choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocketdem Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. This won't matter unless or until...
...the major media outlets pick up on it.

This is just one more test of how willing the media whores are to cover Bush's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's what Email is for The feeding frenzy begins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. this is when you
contact the media with a very friendly ahem
nudge... :donut: feed them too while at it
remember a well fed (aka annoyed) media will
actually work for you... AFTER a lot of
presure.

Now if we can get moveon.org involved... if
you get my drift.

Ah burn the midnight oil writing a letter to my
"friendly" paid and bought for media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. Or how willing you are to go forth and spread the word!
Times a wastin'! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
112. Repeat after me: "If it is to be, it's up to me!"
Get those faxes, phones, letters, and flyers moving!!
Somebody please call Rush. I have a busy schedule tomorrow and can't hang on the phone that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hold on to your horses......Klayman plays both sides of fence!
So what becomes Public will be Klayman's choice.

DUers always keep one eye open!

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. i agree Klayman is somewhat a neo-con
He may just use it to get leverage, but.....what is already released is pretty damning....

There seems to be a movement afoot to impeach Cheney. Foreign suitors of Iraqi oilfields? in march of 2001 ?, that sounds incriminating, to the extreme.

If this is going to take off, i would expect major stories in the NY Times, and USA Today in the next 48 hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
59. Klayman likes his "15 minutes"....LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
109. The Sierra Club was also a plaintiff in this case
I believe that the Sierra Club was also a plaintiff in this case and will have access to the same records. I do not think that the Sierra Club has any desire to protect Bush or Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
113. If these docs are now in the public domain...they should be available
to all of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. don't forget to rate this thread
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Should we start faxing and emailing every
media outlet and talking head in the universe!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Stranger, you just posted one of the biggest stories of the year
Holy moly.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. shoot......y'all ever see the list of lawsuits they have brought?
A total Clinton witch hunt operation.......

http://www.judicialwatch.org/cases.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. But even Klayman won't tie Saddam to 9-11
- Judicial Watch Notice of Suit to Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban - On behalf of its client, a victim of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, JW serves its court-approved Notice of its lawsuit against the above named defendants. See the Notice in English and Arabic. Click here for a copy of the complaint (English, Arabic) - (Jul 17, 2003)

Note to Tony and * - Pay attention, your evidence of WMD was shite, and the Saddie 9-11 tie is also manufactured bull. Please leave now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm comparing the Iraq map to an actual one from March 2001
...And it looks like there are oil fields marked on Cheney's map that aren't on the actual map of Iraqi oil fields from the same time period I found.

Here's the actual March 2001 one:
http://www.reliefweb.int/w/map.nsf/0/50B6CEC6E1C76DBB85256CCB006CB008?Opendocument

Another thing I'm finding odd are those 'Block 1', 'Block 2', etc... areas parceled out in Western Iraq where there aren't any oilfields (yet). Do those look like exploration claims 'for rent' or something?

What I'm thinking looking at this is that it isn't a map of Iraq's oil fields. It's a map of what they WANT to do in Iraq regarding their oil industry. In other words, a plan, not a description.

I'm going to peruse the Saudi Arabia and UAE ones, and see if I can compare that with maps of the actual oil industries as they were in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Check out the "Foreign Suitors" document
You'll see various companies and the blocks to which they correspond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
74. Water?
Could those unidentified markings be water? another of Iraq's resources.

I'm still trying to figure out a screen shot, so I'll be back later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:07 PM
Original message
They appear to be parcels for exploration/development
by various concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #74
94. Water
Good point! Water is not real abundant in the mideast, but Iraq is well supplied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Is it Christmas?
So many presents for us today!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
60. Oh yeah, The Santa had landed! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. I found them......under MEDIA
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 10:35 PM by DagmarK
never mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Docs are here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. All I can say is, EVERYONE
get this information and give it to as many people as possible. The bloggers, the news websites, email the mass media... this has got to get to everyone as fast as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. DOES ANYONE HAVE THE URL FOR THE MEDIA E-MAIL BLASTER?
This is HUGE!

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Isn't it posted on MWO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. Haven't checked.
I saw it on Tom Tomorrow's blog, and when I noticed no one had posted it here yet, I did.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. They Have a Great List
http://www.mediawhoresonline.com/contactinfo.htm

Thanks!

I am also remembering a URL for an e-mail blaster that would mail all of Congress, or all of the media, though. Does that ring any bells to anyone? If that is on MWO, I can't find it.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. Try this site
however, it lists everyone individually: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #48
73. Perhaps you want this URL


http://www.globalfreepress.com

though I can't find the media e-mail-blaster yet, being distracted by great new stuff there.

But I don't think BPilgrim would take the blaster off the site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #73
85. I think he deep sixed it
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:08 PM by RapidCreek
I was looking to scam the code a while back and it was gone.....maybe he hid it someplace else. OOOPs I guess he didn't...never mind.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
61. http://globalfreepress.com/email_the_media.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. I have come back and read this thread
3 times....No wonder Chenney did not want to release these papers. Oh my god, I have been so worried that I was getting my hopes up, and the negative attacks would suddenly stop, and all the hub bub would go away. Not anymore....this is biggggggggg. It will not stay under wraps. He is really going down!!!!!!

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
62. Lew! This is Bigtime Big (thank you to the Dick, Cheney)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Jesus H. Christ on a cross.
No wonder they didn't want us to see them.

Holy yoicks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. i think Cheney is going to resign
I dont think Junior could get 10% of the vote with Sneering Dick on the ticket.

Velcro, velcro , velcro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. Now I know why the Dick, Cheny was balking. Bastard!
These people are gonna pay BIGTIME.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
36. Holy Lawsuits Batman!
Wow, this is definately a surprise.....not what was in them, but the fact that they were actuallu released.

DOes it say anything about California?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. ROFL!!!!
"Holy Lawsuits Batman!"


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. for a little background on this release of papers, go to NOW website
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:09 PM by berry
at PBS.org. Klayman was interviewed either last week or the week before and he said it was coming soon.

Yippee! This is great timing. The more we have coming at Bushco* at once, the less able they will be to get their talking points in order. I hope.

Thanks americanstranger and CatWoman, this needs to stay right on top.

Edited to add:
http://www.pbs.org/now/printable/transcript_klayman_print.html

<snip>KLAYMAN: Very soon. You'll start seeing these documents coming out in the latter part of this year.

And they may show no wrongdoing by the Bush administration. We've never presumed that there were… there were illegal acts. But we need to have full disclosure. Because energy policy is so much tied to the war in terrorism that it's even a matter of national security that the American people know what's going on.<snip>

The link he makes between energy policy and terrorism is interesting.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
64. I never thought that I would actually like Larry Klayman.
Wonders never cease.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. There's a link to the transcript on Klayman's site n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
111. Thanks berry
I saw Klayman on NOW and forgot about it until you mentioned it. Information overload to the max since this resident was crowned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
120. Would that 'link' be the statement Klayman made about
Al Qeuda operating on a regular 2 year basis? so we should expect another soon (as i read it) since this info is soon to be revealed?

hmm, energy policy/al queda links.

dp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote03 Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. "KABOOM"
....I'm curious as to whether or not Mr Baxter was present at those meetings???.....I was hoping that the Caspin Sea Basin would be mentioned, now I discover that the schematic for the oil facilities and pipelines were essentially ready to be downloaded w/GPS coordinates....Certainly casts a new shadow on the 911 Investigation....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
122. March 2001 Some things going on
I don't know whether Cliff Baxter attended any of Cheney's energy task force meetings. However, there were concerns about Enron's accounting schemes surfacing inside Enron and Arthur Andersen at that time, among a few insiders.

I can tell you a few things that happened at the time of March 2001 though. Be sure to note, toward the end, who WASN'T meeting with Cheney and his energy task force.

This is all documented stuff.

MARCH 2001


-March 2001 - Sherron Watkins later testified before the House of Representatives: "I had also heard from one of Mr. Baxter's close friends that he had a conversation with Mr. Skilling in March of 2001. Mr. Baxter's recollection of the meeting was that he told Mr. Skilling 'we are headed for a train wreck, and it is your job to get out in front of the train and try to stop it.'

- March 2001 - Peabody Energy chairman Irl Engelhardt and other energy executives meet with two Cheney task-force members, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham and Bush economic adviser Larry Lindsey. Cheney's group also hears from officials from the nuclear-energy industry-whose trade association, the Nuclear Energy Institute, will contribute $100,000 to the Bush event on 21 May 2001. Both coal and nuclear power will get major endorsements in the task-force report. Peabody Energy is a coal behemoth whose holding company and top officer have given nearly $200,000 to the President and his party since Bush took office, including $25,000 for the May gala.

- March - "I would love to meet with Ken," writes Florida Governor Jeb Bush in an email reply to Bill Bryant, a lobbyist for a Tallahassee law firm representing Ken Lay. Lay had asked to set up a meeting with the governor, and Bryant e-mailed Bush to say that Lay "has asked if it would be possible to visit you in Tallahassee in the near future. The topic would be the energy deregulation bill pending in Congress and Enron's plan for a national media campaign promoting the benefits of a competitive electric energy market. When the bill now pending in Congress becomes law, a competitive wholesale market will soon follow. Mr. Lay would like to discuss this with you and explain how it would affect Florida." Instead of an actual meeting, a 30-minute phone call between Lay and Bush will be set up April 17. Governnor Bush will deny any memory of the phone call on 7 Feb 2002.

- March 1 - Haley Barbour, former RND chairman, writes a memo to Cheney, on behalf of the coal industry, suggesting the president must provide a sound energy policy by not taking action against carbon dioxide. "A moment of truth is arriving. The question is whether environmental policy still prevails over energy policy with Bush-Cheney, as it did with Clinton-Gore," Barbour wrote. Among Barbour's 50 lobbying clients are the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, an industry coalition. The lobbying group - which paid Barbour's firm a half-million dollars last year - was set up by power-generation companies including FirstEnergy, Duke Energy and the Tennessee Valley Authority. FirstEnergy was a top contributor to the Bush campaign.

- March 4 - Tests in recent days confirm the world's largest oil find in three decades in the Kashagan field in the Caspian Sea. Kashagan is a single reservoir at least 25 miles across, and two-and-a-half times the size of the nearby Tengiz field.

- March 7 - Enron officials meet a second time with Cheney to discuss energy policy.

- March 13 - Bush, in a policy reversal, declares that his administration will not seek to regulate power plants' emissions of carbon dioxide, citing an Energy Department study that regulating these emissions could result in higher electricity prices.

- March 15 - United States Secretary of Energy Abraham testifies before Congress that power blackouts in California this summer are "inevitable." However, he does not argue for any federal government action to avert this outcome.

- March 19 - The second set of rolling blackouts hits California, affecting southern California for first time.

- March 20 - An official from the American Petroleum Institute sends an e-mail to Joseph Kelliher, a Department of Energy policy adviser, proposing language for a presidential directive governing energy regulations. API calls it "a suggested executive order to ensure that energy implications are considered and acted on in rulemakings and other executive actions." Bush will issue Executive Order 13211 on 18 May 2001, using nearly identical language to that supplied by API.

- March 22 -A low-level Energy Department staffer calls Grenpeace and and gives the environmental organization 24 hours to provide any input it has on energy policy. Greenpeace decides not to scramble to meet the tight deadline. "If they were serious about getting input," says Greenpeace spokesman Gary Skulnik, "that was certainly not the way to go about it."

- March 26 - Sen. Dianne Feinstein sends the second of three letters to Bush requesting a meeting to discuss California's dire energy situation. These requests are denied.

- March 29 - Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham meets with Enron executives Joe Hartsoe and Linda Robertson.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. Kick, Boom, Bwahahahahahahahaha...
It's all starting to come apart at the seems, no???

:shrug::evilgrin::shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
82. Is it possible? could it be? HO-ly...
:bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. No wonder he was fighting this so much....
If this doesn't bring them down nothing will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #50
72. Exactly, now we know why the Dick, Cheney did not want this to come out.
Coward - Liar - Incompetent CEO - Did I say liar?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
52. I pose this question and I'm NOT defending them--ok?
Again, I want to state upfront that I'm not defending them--ok?

Wouldn't it be plausible that the energy papers would need to contain info about the state of Middle Eastern oil given our huge dependence on it? Is it possible that the media will dismiss this as a partisian attack on Unca Dick?

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. well
Isn't there some sort of ban/embargo on doing business with Iraq? If there is, why have these plans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
80. That's what i was worried about.
Is there any way these slimeballs can spin this so as to make any outrage look like tinhat kooks. I for one have always thought that the reason Cheney et al were fighting the release of these documents was because they contained references to the PNAC plan for conquering Iraq.

If this proves to be the case then it's firing squad time. But, I am just a little sceptical about these viscious battards' number of lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Star Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
84. Ok, so the maps are common property
Then why did they work so hard and for so long to conceal them?

Let them explain why there was an attempt to hide these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushfire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. Tune in to Malloy - I'm on hold
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 10:48 PM by Bushfire
no callers ahead of me, and will be plugging DU, american stranger for posting this great thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indictrichardperle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. interesting theory
Washington Insiders, always know things in advance, for last couple of weeks, may have known this was coming......

Tweety and other whores are turning on the administration, but not Junior, they seem to be focusing on Sneering Dick. I think the Uranium flap and future investigations, may be partially pursued with the objective of getting Dick to resign.

I think Junior is un-electable
with absolute certitude, unless the Sneering Dick resigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
75. I heard, too bad you got pre-empted, but it's getting out there!!!
thanks for the quote, too! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
77. I heard you bushfire! And I didn't hear Mike talking about the
"Energy Papers" earlier and I've been listening all night!

I could have missed it, though!

You were great! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #53
87. TELL IT!! Good job!!!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushfire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. Thanks everybody
sorry I forgot to thank stranger, but Mike threw me off saying they talked about it already. hmmm...i might have to download the entire show to find out, but I hate to listen to my voice. i can always turn off the last 5 minutes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
63. Where the hell is page 2????
On the Foreign Contracts pdf, there's only one page, and, alphabetically, it doesn't go up to the US. That's the page I want to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushfire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #63
108. I'm with you on that
where is PAGE 2 ?!? I want to know what US suitors there were back in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
66. GREAT DAY IN THE MORNING! THEY'RE BRINGING DOWN THE BFEE!!!

Couple this stuff with 9-11 and it's good night, Adolf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
69. How do I get a screen shot? Compaq laptop computer.
Thank you very much. I already copied and pasted everything. Let me know how to do a screen shot. I want to save this on a CD. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #69
86. Ctrl+Prt Scrn copies the screen to your clipboard.
Then just paste into your photo editor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #86
98. Thank you very much.
I had forgotten that I need to use the shift key to press "print screen". Screen shots don't work for pdf, at least it didn't for me. I got the others, though.

I'll be saving these on a CD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #69
97. Screen shot
When you have the pdf file up on your screen, click on the key "PrtScSysRq" on your keyboard. then open a graphic program, and paste (Ctrl V).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
70. The USA and Saudi Arabia should be *very* worried.......
I agree with the above poster...this is a wish list.....

All the text files seem to be focused on what the opportunities may be, could be, if only, if only WE WERE OCCUPYING.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
71. Fineman/Woodward/Russert busy sucking on Robertson's anus. Email
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:06 PM by dArKeR
them to come up from that dark smelly place and write an honest report for once!

woodwardb@washpost.com, abramowitz@washpost.com, hadarm@washpost.com, kingc@washpost.com, leenj@washpost.com, marcusr@washpost.com, letters@washpost.com

howardfineman@aol.com, mtp@nbc.com, neal.shapiro@nbc.com, mark.effron@msnbc.com, Erik.Sorenson@msnbc.com, world@msnbc.com, letters@MSNBC.com, TWIP@msnbc.com, merrill.brown@msnbc.com, reed.price@msnbc.com, steve.johnson@msnbc.com, gary.sheffer@corporate.ge.com, louise.binns@corporate.ge.com, alex.constantinople@corporate.ge.com


WebEditors@newsweek.com, Editors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com

info@ap.org, pr@ap.org, chaswell@ap.org

jp.editorial@reuters.com, hiroshi.nakanishi@reuters.com, koichi.nakasaki@reuters.com,
simon.walker@reuters.com, susan.allsopp@reuters.com, nancy.bobrowitz@reuters.com, deanna.masella@reuters.com, liam.tay@reuters.com, yvonne.diaz@reuters.com, kyle.arteaga@reuters.com, heike.baumann@reuters.com

ombudsman@npr.org, morning@npr.org, jconnelly@npr.org, nprhelp@npr.org, ejohnson@npr.org, fadams@npr.org, jmoody@npr.org, employment@npr.org

moneyline@cnn.com, CNN@cnn.com, cnnmoney@money.com, WBlitzer.Reports@turner.com, cnnfutures@cnn.com, walter.isaacson@cnn.com, q&a@cnn.com, quest@cnn.com, askcnni@cnn.com, cnn@cnn.com

http://money.cnn.com/services/speakup/
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/

2020@abcnews.com, netaudr@abc.com

newshour@pbs.org

mg3@cbsnews.com

Eric.Spinato@Foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com

brehm@npr.org, bdrake@npr.org, ccorley@npr.org

Letters@nypost.com

chairmanoffice@sec.gov, enforcement@sec.gov, publicinfo@sec.gov

complaints@complaints.com

AskDOJ@usdoj.gov, jeffrey.dorschner@usdoj.gov http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/co/index.htm district of CO.

mpowell@fcc.gov, kabernat@fcc.gov, mcopps@fcc.gov, kjmweb@fcc.gov, jadelste@fcc.gov, fccinfo@fcc.gov, campaignlaw@fcc.gov, webmaster@fcc.gov

feedback@mirror.co.uk, mailbox@mirror.co.uk, shiraz.lalani@mirror.co.uk

khyu@heraldm.com, spring@heraldm.com

ngibson@nbr.co.nz, dhill@nbr.co.nz, janderson@nbr.co.nz,
s.mcmillan@xtra.co.nz, uma.v@xtra.co.nz, jgamlin@paradise.net.nz, jdrinnan@clear.net.nz


http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-comment-oped.story
http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-comment-dcbureau.story


staff@heritage.org -To Dr. Nile Gardiner - To Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
oconnells@heritage.org, chris.kennedy@heritage.org, Paul.Skoczylas@Heritage.org, mark.tapscott@heritage.org, KhrisBershers@heritage.org, JoeDougherty@heritage.org, Nicole.Taylor@heritage.org, membership@heritage.org, info@heritage.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #71
79. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
76. Smoky??? meet Gunny....
wow...just wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
78. Do We Know If He Got All Of Them, Some of Them, Is There More To come???
Are there more drips for this flood???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #78
91. I think there's more to come.
I give this a 25% chance of being substantial.

Jeebus, it would be great though.

"Mr. Vice President, can you please explain why you were interested in Iraq's oil fields in 2001?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbhpolitoon Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
81. amazing coincidence
This important post by americanstranger is number Nine one one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Divine intervention
A sign, ok..now I know I need my tinfoil hat :silly:

And you, tbhpolitoon are very observant!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. But wait theres more, or is there? WHAT ABOUT CALIFORNIA???
THAT COULD TOTALLY EFFECT THE RECALL. I bet they have them under lock and chain and those WMD weve been looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n0_data Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #81
89. Actually
He was at 909 when posting this story. He's made two replies since his initial post, so now he has 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #81
115. got a screenshot before it changes---also, Klayman's client Wright
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:39 PM by anamandujano
A couple other posters mentioned the 911 tie-in. Klayman has a client who has been trying to spill some beans for awhile. They had a press conf. on CSPAN right around the time Rowley was testifying.

"In a memo written 91 days before Sept. 11, Special Agent Robert G. Wright Jr. warned that Americans would die as a result of the FBI's failure to investigate terrorists living in this country. "

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/30/161204.shtml

(Sorry about the newmax source; here is the google search if anyone wants a better source).

http://tinyurl.com/hatl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
88. QUESTION TO DUERS: So spell this out for me.......
I am a little dense.

The purpose of the suit was to get to the bottom of "alleged" price fixing on energy to drive the price of energy up...to increase the profits of the energy companies. And they did this by making it appear like there was a shortage of energy......demand was high (it was COLD that winter), and the prices skyrocketed.

and the allegation is that Cheney assisted the energy companies in this illegal charade.

and there were meetings...that JW wanted to get the details of. Hell, Congress did, but Cheney said NOPE, and they said, "oh, okay."

So.......DRAW me a (pipe)line between the energy crisis of 2000/2001 AND these maps, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #88
102. I don't think these papers address that
I think we got something pretty unexpected, but far more damning. Instead of documenting plans for a fake energy crisis they show Cheney et al. divvying up foriegn countries before 911, before the Iraq invasion, before anything. It's a wish list of the neocons and oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:37 PM
Original message
ENRON, Cheney, Bush and Co. set the energy policy...
... Those compassionate conservatives knew that the world's oil is fast running out and the place to be if you want to get richer quicker is right in the middle of the oil.

These documents demonstrate the BFEE had a plan for doing something BIG with the world's major oil deposits. The Iraqi map denotes "Operational Refineries," meaning the little oily turds wanted to know where the juice is getting activated.

Still, even while intentionally starving California utilities and gouging consumers, ENRON was going to be going down the business crapper without, literally, a lock on big income in the short term. Controlling the Middle East and Caspian basin oil and gas would do for starters.

So, Bush turned his back on 9-11, making possible the set of conditions needed to move in the Marines and the Third Infantry Division ASAFP. For Bushler, that was 9-11. Tony the Poodle had to talk him out of it and go for Osama FIRST.

This should get the whole bloody lot impeached, tried, convicted, and for the lucky ones, imprisoned for life. The others? I'd turn them over to the Iraqi and Afghani courts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #88
119. draw a map...pipeline..
well, said energy crisis was manufactured. the deregulation was going to lower prices thru competitoin, I believe that the conspiracy was revieled here in el paso tx, a satalite company of the oil pipeline here was charging 2,800% more than before deregulation. aparently the pipeline is broken up in sections and each little fiefdom along the way gets its share. then several key generators were shut down for schedualed repairs during the peak demand season. and there were transmission problems never encountered before. basiclly CA was bankrupted then the Fascists point their fingers at davis and blame him for CA's problem, start a recall so a republican is incumbent in the CA presidential race.............as for the maps, it looks to me these were for our future energy supplies and policies, consider where they were found...part of the 'Big Empire' picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
93. Anything about the Afghanistan oil pipeline project for Kenny Boy
Or the energy company fleecing spree in California?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignoramus Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
96. Eh...
I don't get it actually. Are these maps all that they got from the FOIA lawsuit? If not, why aren't they giving us the rest of the info? If it is all that they have, I don't get how it shows anything in particular relative to the US. Does it indicate that the US was going to somehow be involved with those oilfields?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
99. Hold on a second - these maps are NOT a smoking gun
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:27 PM by Cronus
Not yet anyway. Any national level discussion of the US's energy needs, usage and requirements would have to include its sources of oil. The oil in many parts of the world is running out and the US requires huge quantities of it to continue to be the world's most powerful nation, economically and militarily (the armed forces run on gasoline too).

So it's not a problem per se to have maps of SA, AE and Iraq in there. What seems to me to be more of a problem is why there aren't Afghani maps? (Scrubbed? or just not found in the pile of paper yet)

I'm waiting for more to come out before I get too excited about this. If it turns out, as some have suggested here, that they were apportioning Saudi land to US Companies with the intention of taking the land forcefully, then we'll have a smoking gun. They may, however, just have been having US companies bid on lots of land that the Saudis would open up for exploration, for instance.

I'm going to sread the word around that these exist, but I'm not going to shoot my wad prematurely on this one.



http://kucinichforpresident.com - Kucinich Is The One
http://cronus.com/prayer - One of Kucinich's speeches

http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13 - cute little buttons
http://bushspeaks.com - sardonic political toons
http://cronus.com - enlightening and educational liberal fun

Conceptual Guerilla
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #99
123. Afghanistan was only important as a pipeline route
for the gas from Kazikstan (and the other Soviet states) to run through. But still a good question. I frankly don't believe ANY of what they find will result in anything damning since they've had so g-damned long to scrub everything. It's all just smoke I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
100. Ok looks pretty damning
the timing though? Today of all days when they didn't even expent these papers until jan 04. Is this to try to keep W from going down with the rest of them. Cause it is not just gonna be cheney. Someone help me out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
105. Question is...
How complete this info is... redacted, sanitized, etc.

Klayman's involvement makes me vewy vewy suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
106. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
107. i'm going to get really f***ing cynical right now and say
that i don't think this means squat without knowing exactly who was in the meetings, and where the dam*ed map of afghanistan is with the pipeline to enron's power plant in india. unless there are truly some plans revealed by these maps and lists, and something that really shows that aggressive efforts would be necessary to secure those plans, i'm going to say that cheney was using this entire thing as a distraction to prove "there's nothing there." more frigging "look over here!" slight-of-hand-stuff from the administration. who rifled through these "papers" before they were released? and if there are more papers, what is on them? and WHO WERE THE PEOPLE AT THE MEETINGS???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
110. Such a GOOD news week! :) The whole house of cards- coming down
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 11:35 PM by Tinoire
Down down down...

:bounce: :bounce:

I just hope they don't have anything in store as a historical distraction. It's too late but will they accept that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
114. I guess that Iraq is our energy policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aleesha Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
117. I KNEW IT!!
I always felt this Iraq invasion was planned before the 2000 election!!
The desperado's had to rob Gore of his Presidency so they could get in to the Whitehouse and go after the oil in Iraq.
I fu**ing knew it!!
I hope this little fu*k burns in hell along with his piece of shit VP!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
121. So why was Cheney & crew looking at these maps?
Maybe in order to know where to send troops to secure Iraqi oilfields? All they needed was something to make the US people go along with whatever they wanted. Could that have been 911?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
124. Please Continue on Thread 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
126. TREASON and A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!
Oil plot maps and Iraqi oil concessions, dating back to 1997?

I demand my representatives enter dual articles of impeachment, Bush first and then Cheney! Crime? Treason and Fraud, conduct And international agencies start proceedings for the criminal war crime trials of the century. The hell that this war wasn't about oil! Our soliders are being killed for an old-fashion oil resource grab (kinda like that 1955 Suez War that found the US on the 'wrong' side) and all benefiting Cheney buddies and other oil industrial cartel members, the oil-garchy.

All oligarchies, wherein a few men domineer, do what they list. --Burton.

Write to your representatives ...

Also kudos to Judicial Watch on this coup ... wonder if they have the balls to 'Bring it on!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
127. Caution
I absolutely believe that these people have a long term agenda and must work frenetically in spurts at certain times. We just had a spurt. I absolutely believe they wanted oil in Iraq and could care less about what Hussein did or could do. They used our soldiers not in defense of we, the citizens, but as corporate soldiers for oil.

But, these maps have to have text or testimony with them or they'll be ' 'splainin' 'em away '. Their realase could also be a trap.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC