Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Many in new Medicare plans deprived of common drugs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:27 AM
Original message
Study: Many in new Medicare plans deprived of common drugs
WASHINGTON — Almost one-third of the 6.2 million Medicaid beneficiaries who were automatically switched to the new Medicare prescription drug program on Jan. 1 were put in plans that cover fewer drugs than commonly used under Medicaid, a new study shows.

Only 18% of those beneficiaries were assigned to plans that cover all of the 178 commonly used drugs, says a report from Daniel Levinson, inspector general for the Department of Health and Human Services.

The report comes as concern grows over the fate of those low-income Medicaid patients, who were automatically enrolled in Medicare's prescription drug program at the start of the year. They lost their drug coverage through the state-administered Medicaid programs, which some advocates say was a better benefit.

Stephanie Altman, program and policy director for Health and Disability Advocates, a Chicago-based group that helps low-income people on Medicare and Medicaid, says the study illustrates one of the risks facing this population.

http://yahoo.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-01-27-medicare-study_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. We've had many complaints in our agency about this
and the drug companies who used to help out have withdrawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This so called program is a disaster. A relative was enrolled
in a program she did not choose, and her co-pay is 12 dollars higher than she used to pay. 12 dollars does not sound like a lot, but to her it is. She barely gets by on her income,and was paying a 2 dollar co-pay through the state program. Plus , the state had to pay for this as the Feds are so screwed up. Who knows what will happen? I still think it is part of the plan to kill off SS.Feds say they are not responsible for the screw up, and that people will will have to get compensation from the HMO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not a part of the plan to kill off SS.
It's part of the plan to kill off people who can no longer produce for the masters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That was the plan all along, folks..
Give the pharma companies their cash right at the start..(to "study" the plan and give them enough time to ratchet the prices up)..prices up 40%..discount 30%...then issue the funky cards in such a haphazard and confusing way that most people would be totally confused. Then dump the rest into the most worthless plans available..

Of course now that "everyone" is "eligible", there's no "need" for the companies to offer compassionate assistance to the poor.

Now the states have to jump in and clean up the mess, so of course *² and his pals can say.. "see, the states can do a better job", so the federal government doesn't even have to be involved"...and then they cancel the whole mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you can make Medicaid/Medicare look bad, it makes it easier to kill
This is just phase one. Once they muck up the system so bad that it is crippled, then they will claim the best solution would be to privatize the whole thing because the private sector can "run it better."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. well-- the private drug companies (and insurers) are in charge already-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Each Pharmaceutical company has a few drugs of what one needs
but doens't handle all. So one must choose which drug and company to go with and pay through the nose for the other prescriptions that aren't needed on a daily basis.

I understand one is allowed to make one change in a Pharmaceutical company without being penalized by Medicare. Is this correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. blood pressure, cholesterol and pain meds were most commonly omitted.
The most commonly omitted drugs were those that regulate blood pressure, cholesterol and pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Besides being inhumane, this is stupid. BP and cholesterol drugs...
for example, are preventive drugs that are meant to prevent major medical crises. Unless they don't mean for people to be treated when those crises occur --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Remember Phillip Morris's study "Early Deaths save Federal Medical Costs"?
Edited on Sat Jan-28-06 12:09 PM by Angry Girl
You mention a very good point. These drugs help guard against future major health events. Now check this out....

A few years ago Phillip Morris (now known as Altria -- such a pretty name for a poison manufacturer, no?) was caught red-handed with a report they gave to the Czech government stating the benefits of early mortality:

Philip Morris Cos. officials in the Czech Republic have been distributing an economic analysis concluding that cigarette consumption isn't a drag on the country's budget, in part because smokers' early deaths help offset medical expenses.

The report, commissioned by the cigarette maker and produced by consulting firm Arthur D. Little International, totes up smoking's "positive effects" on national finances, including revenue from excise and other taxes on cigarettes and "health-care cost savings due to early mortality."

The premature demise of smokers saved the Czech government between 943 million koruna and 1.19 billion koruna (between $23.8 million and $30.1 million or between 20.3 million euros and 25.7 million euros) on health care, pensions and housing for the elderly in 1999, according to the report.

The report also calculates the costs of smoking, such as the expense of caring for sick smokers and people made ill by second-hand smoke as well as income taxes lost when smokers die. Weighing the costs and benefits, the report concludes that in 1999 the government had a net gain of 5.82 billion koruna ($147.1 million) from smoking.

http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Philip-Morris-Czech.htm

A "modest proposal" from tobacco giant Philip Morris
By Joanne Laurier - 19 July 2001
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/jul2001/phil-j19.shtml

And after seeing the headline that up to 80% of blacks won't be returning to New Orleans, this only confirms my belief that Katrina was a massive ethnic cleansing effort by the Bushies. So I cannot help but connect more dots....

Lung disease rates divide along race lines
ALICIA CHANG; The Associated Press - Published: January 26th, 2006 02:30 AM
LOS ANGELES – Blacks who smoke up to a pack a day are far more likely than whites who smoke similar amounts to develop lung cancer, suggesting genes might help explain the racial differences long seen in the disease, researchers say.

The largest study ever done on the subject also found that Hispanic and Asian smokers were less likely than black smokers to develop the disease – at least up to a point. The racial differences disappeared among those who puffed more than a pack and a half per day.

Doctors have long known that blacks are substantially more likely than whites to develop lung cancer and more likely to die from it. But the reasons for the disparity are unclear.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nationworld/story/5484618p-4946318c.html

African Americans Face Higher Risk Of Lung Cancer Than Other Races, Study Says
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=36679

Tobacco Use and African Americans
http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=310293
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'd forgotten that story! Thanks for the reminder, Angry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. in other words, the biggest sellers, the cash cows for Big Pharma
The compassionless leadership of this country disgusts me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kick and NOM #4. These articles show Dictator 43's pure hatred for
the poor, elderly and disabled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. My dad had a stack of paperwork nearly an inch thick
with information about the dizzying array of plans and options. He was a very smart man and he was lost.

It's what you get when you let corporations write laws for their benefit, not ours.

We have got to find a way to get these men out of power and keep them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. The repub/norquist/gingrich agenda is to ensure that federal programs are
set up to fail. That way, they can tell everyone how "terrible" every federal agency is (except, of course, their beloved Defense Department, where they will siphon no money away from) and push their privatization and deregulation agenda.

Otherwise, how can they become millionaire board of director members at morgan stanley, arthur anderson, halliburton, boeing, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC