Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Merrill to Pay $164 Mln to Settle 23 Research Suits (Bloomberg)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:48 PM
Original message
Merrill to Pay $164 Mln to Settle 23 Research Suits (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=71000001&refer=home&sid=awudx0BA1GNU

Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co., the world's largest securities firm, will pay $164 million to settle 23 investor lawsuits, ending most litigation over whether it issued misleading research on Internet companies.

New York-based Merrill said in a filing today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that two class action lawsuits remain active against the firm, one of which is before the U.S. Supreme Court.

``It was a long, hard, difficult negotiation,'' said Herbert Milstein, a partner in the Washington law firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll, who represents shareholders. ``Merrill thought there was a risk, and we negotiated a settlement,'' he said, adding that the deal was reached late last night.

Merrill said in the SEC filing that the firm will record a $170 million litigation expense in its fourth-quarter 2005 financial results.

. . .

Merrill, through its star technology analyst Henry Blodget and other researchers, issued reports urging investors to buy shares of Internet companies such as 24/7 Real Media Inc. and Interliant Inc. Investors claimed the analysts didn't believe the companies were good risks. Investors later filed lawsuits against Merrill, claiming they were misled and seeking damages.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had to settle because the judge who decided it was okay
for Blodget et al. to keep putting lipstick on the pigs in which the investment banking side of Merrill had extreme interest died before he could dismiss all the suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC