Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WA: Group to file initiative that would require all voters to reregister

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:10 AM
Original message
WA: Group to file initiative that would require all voters to reregister
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002820464_webvote21.html

By RACHEL LA CORTE
The Associated Press

OLYMPIA, Wash. – Voters would have to prove they are U.S. citizens and reregister to vote under an initiative that supporters said they will file this week.

Conservative think-tank Evergreen Freedom Foundation has formed Grassroots Washington, which is backing the initiative that was expected to be announced Wednesday afternoon.

... The initiative would make all voter registrations inactive until people proved their citizenship and reregistered. Voters who show up at the polls and find they are inactive can vote by provisional ballot until their registration is verified, he said.

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't these people just let citizens vote?
Can you image if the dems were pulling this shit?

Heads. Would. Roll. And rightfully so. What the hell is going on in this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. What makes this insidious...
...is that an increasing number (possibly even a majority by now) of Washington voters do so by absentee ballot.

While those actually showing up at the polls would have to bring "proof of citizenship," those who rely upon absentee ballots would simply stop receiving them. That would mean that a large number of those voters (the elderly and those with incapacitating illnesses, to name a couple of groups that couldn't just respond by showing up at the polls with their passports or birth certificates) would be disenfranchised. As, for that matter, would be anyone without "appropriate" documents -- and do you know how hard it is to get a duplicate birth certificate, particularly if you were born at the other end of the country?

Well, that's the only way to turn Washington into a red state -- preventing most of the voters from being able to cast a ballot.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I doubt the Washington I know will go quietly for this..
there will be a HUGE fuss made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, yea. they'll stop it. Did you notice this...?
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 02:38 AM by Viva_La_Revolution
Instead of saying "A community group, Grassroots Washington, is backing the initiative that was expected to be announced Wednesday afternoon."

This reporter gave us all the details.

"Conservative think-tank Evergreen Freedom Foundation has formed Grassroots Washington, which is backing the initiative that was expected to be announced Wednesday afternoon."

they included a great quote from Excell -

"Just because we don't happen to think that every voter record is perfect we can't wholesale disenfranchise everybody," he said.


important info to fight the RW spin -

Excell said investigators had not found any evidence of illegal votes, and noted that most of the questioned registrations were inactive, meaning that the individuals hadn't voted recently. Many of the duplicates likely represent people who failed to cancel their registration in one county when they moved to another, he said.


I love the Seattle Times. :) I haven't picked up an Oregonian in months. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Does the Oregonian suck?
I like the Seattle Times, too--when I can get it down here. Borders hasn't got many northern papers in a while...:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I read the times online...
:)

And yes, the Oregonian sucks. OK, if I find a copy on the bus, I might pick it up, for the LTTEs. None of the rest has any real information.

The Faces of Meth was a great piece, but unfortunately was an aberration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good idea--
I'll check it out online! Is Oregon really conservative, or is it blended. I used to communicate on a board, and a few of the Oregon members were rabidly neo-conservative. :scared: They were rather frightening actually.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. We have uberliberals in the cities, and serious wacko reds in the rural
areas. There are pockets of very red, but no worries, we outnumber them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Oh that great--maybe the reason
that guy was so rabid was because he was so outnumbered. He was SO whacked out! One of those people that just quotes rush all the time. Severe head case. ;)

I've got to visit, I'm always so thrilled to see you guys on the news protesting--does my heart good! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yikes--excuse my typo..
it should read Oh that's great... So sorry. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The Times endorsed Bush* in 2000
Sour grapes here. And a healthy dose of scepticism about that paper. If you want a liberal view, the PI is even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Sir, may I see your papers?"
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. and the provisional ballot box would look a little like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC