And letters have been running against the board. As a poster said in Pennsylvania forum USC residents need to do a Dover on this board.Upper St. Clair GOP voters, thank yourselves for the IB decision
My letter is directed to the registered Republican voters of Upper St. Clair. If you are angered by our school board's decision to eliminate the International Baccalaureate program ("Board Unmoved by Crowd: Upper St. Clair Kills International Baccalaureate Program," Feb. 21), then you need to direct that anger to your local party officials.
Let me remind you that your Republican Party officials endorsed William Sulkowski, Daniel Iracki, Carol Coliane and David Bluey during the primary election last year, and it was by a majority decision that the Republican voters in our community chose them as their candidates for the general election.
The Democratic voters of our community, of which I am proudly one, voted by majority and chose Amy Billerbeck, Russell Del Re, Vicki McKenna and Dennis Phillips as our candidates for the November election.
Most registered voters in our community are Republican and voted the Republican side of the ballot in November. If you are now unhappy with the board we are stuck with, speak up to your local party officials.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06053/658914.stmAnd from reader commentsThe USC School Board has missed the point completely regarding the IB program. The "I" stands for "International", which means teaching a worldview, not an intolerant local culture. They should be ashamed of themselves for their ignorance. I wonder how many of them believe the Earth was created 10,000 years ago?
Roy J. Matway, Tarentum
It is unbelievable to me that a school program can be ended because it does not necessarily reflect Christian values. Our government intsitutions (including public education) should not be considered a vehicle for any religion. While the people who have eliminated this program may say that it costs too much, say that it is "radical", etc, it is clear that the real reasons are that it presents a world view contrary to popular christian ideology.
Has our country become so conservative that it is now acceptable to openly support no separation between church and state? I wonder how the people that openly push for their religious view of the world to be taught would feel if they were in the minority and had to put up with a majority religion like theirs telling them what they should and should't be allowed to learn. I myself am not a minority and probably hold many of the same religious beliefs as these opponents to the curriculum, but it seems wrong to me that church and state have unapologetically come together.
Tait Tomb, Shadyside
Now that the Upper St. Clair School Board has cut its IB program, I've decided I want nothing to do with Judeo/Christian and/or American values.
Apparently, those values suppress critical thinking and/or the exploration of multiple points of view. Such thinking reflects an America that values sophistry over intellectual pursuit.
What would they have done to that "foreigner", Socrates?
Bob Hartley, Lawrenceville