Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intel agencies REPEATEDLY warned the WH about local insurgency in 2003

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 08:53 PM
Original message
Intel agencies REPEATEDLY warned the WH about local insurgency in 2003
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 09:01 PM by stop the bleeding

By WARREN P. STROBEL and JONATHAN S. LANDAY
Knight Ridder NewspapersWASHINGTON -

WASHINGTON - U.S. intelligence agencies repeatedly warned the White House beginning more than two years ago that the insurgency in Iraq had deep local roots, was likely to worsen and could lead to civil war, according to former senior intelligence officials who helped craft the reports.

Among the warnings, Knight Ridder has learned, was a major study, called a National Intelligence Estimate, completed in October 2003 that concluded that the insurgency was fueled by local conditions - not foreign terrorists - and drew strength from deep grievances, including the presence of U.S. troops.

The existence of the top-secret document, which was the subject of a bitter three-month debate among U.S. intelligence agencies, has not been previously disclosed to a wide public audience.

The reports received a cool reception from Bush administration policymakers at the White House and the office of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, according to the former officials, who discussed them publicly for the first time.

~snip~

Robert Hutchings, the chairman of the National Intelligence Council from 2003 to 2005, said the October 2003 study was part of a "steady stream" of dozens of intelligence reports warning Bush and his top lieutenants that the insurgency was intensifying and expanding.

"Frankly, senior officials simply weren't ready to pay attention to analysis that didn't conform to their own optimistic scenarios," Hutchings said in a telephone interview.


read full article here:



http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/13984788.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same as it ever was. They get learned advise,
and then ignore it. General Shinseki, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. More from the article:
"The mindset downtown was that people were willing to accept that things were pretty bad, but not that they were going to get worse, so our analyses tended to get dismissed as `nay-saying and hand-wringing,' to quote the president's press spokesman," he said.
The result, he said, was that top political and military officials focused on ways of dealing with foreign jihadists and disaffected Saddam loyalists, rather than with other pressing problems, such as growing Iraqi anger at the U.S.-led occupation and the deteriorating economic and security situation.
A former senior U.S. official who participated in the process said that analysts at the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department's intelligence bureau all agreed that the insurgency posed a growing threat to stability in Iraq and to U.S. hopes for forming a new government and rebuilding the economy.
"This was stuff the White House and the Pentagon did not want to hear," the former official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "They were constantly grumbling that the people who were writing these kind of downbeat assessments `needed to get on the team,' `were not team players' and were `sitting up there (at CIA headquarters) in Langley sucking their thumbs.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush told of Iraq civil war fears in '03

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/13985596.htm

Bush told of Iraq civil war fears in '03
Early reports warned of expanding, intensifying homegrown insurgency

WASHINGTON — U.S. intelligence agencies repeatedly warned the White House beginning more than two years ago that the insurgency in Iraq had deep local roots, was likely to worsen and could lead to civil war, according to former senior intelligence officials who helped craft the reports.

Among the warnings, Knight Ridder has learned, was a major study, called a National Intelligence Estimate, completed in October 2003 that concluded that the insurgency was fueled by local conditions — not foreign terrorists— and drew strength from deep grievances, including the presence of U.S. troops.

The existence of the top-secret document, which was the subject of a bitter three-month debate among U.S. intelligence agencies, has not been previously disclosed to a wide public audience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can you say 25% approval?
I'm sure that there is a segment of Bush* support that actually believes the noble claims he makes. Sooner or later, they will regret the massive loss of life in this Roy Rogers spin off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I like these parts as well
In August 2003, with concerns about the insurgency growing, Bush told reporters: "There are some who feel like … the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is bring them on. … We've got the force necessary to deal with the security situation."

On Nov. 1, 2003, a day after the National Intelligence Estimate was distributed, Bush said in his weekly radio address: "Some of the killers behind these attacks are loyalists of the Saddam regime who seek to regain power and who resent Iraq's new freedoms. Others are foreigners who have traveled to Iraq to spread fear and chaos. … The terrorists and the Baathists hope to weaken our will. Our will cannot be shaken."

As recently as May 2005, Cheney told a television interviewer: "I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency."

White, who worked at the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, said of the administration: "They've gone through various excuse phases."

Now, he said, "The levels of resistance are pretty much as high as they were a year ago."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is that right? Cheney's "last throes" comment in May, 2005?
I thought it was much more recent.

In any case, there should be an official "Cheney Last Throes" Anniversary here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. ARE YOU KIDDING!?!?! Poppy was told about this...
in '91. The same people are making the decisions NOW that wanted to go to Baghdad THEN and Poppy over-ruled them (one of the FEW things he did of which I approve). They knew before they invaded that there would be civil war because there was going to be a huge power vacuum. Saddam ruled by tyranny. The people who opposed him behaved because they didn't want to visit Abu Graib. Now that he's gone and EVERYONE there is subject to summary arrenst & torture (by at least ONE of the four sides), they don't have anything left to loose, and it's chaos.

Gee, what a shocker! <-- :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The only traitor here is you
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. We love ya! telling people to "F" off is not very morally acceptable
WWJD -

bring it monkey boy

let's see if you can spit out more vulgar vernacular
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow, the mods sure are quick!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not really...
he was trolling on a couple other threads for a while. He only just discovered this one before he was tombstoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. wow, what a loser
He has WAY too much time on his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well the "a"hole probably got about 100 alerts - dumbass MORANS
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. excellent article about the smoke and mirrors utilized by *
there have never been terrorists in Iraq. It was civil war from the git go after we got there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Are the ready now?
"Frankly, senior officials simply weren't ready to pay attention to analysis that didn't conform to their own optimistic scenarios,"

* & Co. have been lying to us from the start. How much more does it take for people to wake up and kick this motherfucking asshole to the side of the road. He is no better than roadkill. God, I hate these people!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well he never saw it on TV,
so there was no way him to find out about it all. Had the networks not shown the Katrina victims starving and drowning to death Bush would have never known about it, see, understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC