Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miss. House committee votes to ban most abortions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:15 PM
Original message
Miss. House committee votes to ban most abortions
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 11:49 PM by intheflow

Miss. House committee votes to ban most abortions
Associated Press

JACKSON, Miss. - A Mississippi House committee voted Tuesday to ban most abortions in the state.

The only exception would be if the life of the pregnant woman were in danger. There would be no abortions allowed in cases of pregnancy caused by rape or incest.

(snip)

http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/13984316.htm



This is not good news, Friends.
Please vote it up to spread the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell is happening, and why so suddenly?
Is this new trend going to sweep every red state in the next few months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Alito happened.
We all knew this was coming .. but I didn't think it would happen so fast either. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
44. Carl Rove is behind this
He needs to get the hateful christian whack-nut jobs out to vote this Nov.

And vote they will, early and OFTEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
84. Exactly: this is setting up a WEDGE ISSUE for the 2006 Midterms
Karl Rove is artificially creating controversy to turn this into a massive wedge issue for 2006. This will mobilize the fundie base massively to come out and vote for the Big Monkey.

Make no mistake. They'll drop this issue a couple of days after the midterms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #84
112. Exactly right. Just like they dropped the Constitutional
Amendment for gay marriage right after the November, 2004, elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #112
118. Abortion will be this election's gay marriage
You can bet your money on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #118
168. If so, it's a monumental miscalculation by the Republicans...
To be quite cold-blooded about it, there are far more people who would be negatively affected by a ban on abortion than a ban on gay marriage. In the former case, one could generally count on more fundies being mobilized to vote for a ban than you could gays and lesbians voting against it (while lots of "tolerant" straights wouldn't see it as something that concerned them enough to get out and vote), so it was a winning issue for the G.O.P. But a ban on abortion? For every Religious Right type you will get to the polls, you'll get two or three irate pro-choicers (mostly women, but also men who want the option to be open so that their girlfriend or daughter doesn't have to have a baby they don't want) who see it as a matter of protecting their own rights.

My guess would be that, should Roe be overturned and the decision returned to the states, any attempt to put an abortion ban on a state ballot will likely hurt the Republicans in that election. Pro-choicers (once you motivate them to get themselves to the polls) are likely to vote for Democratic candidates as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #168
176. Hope you are right
Sincerely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #168
184. and many pro-lifers...we need to recognize this
We miss a lot of voters by spreading the brush too broad. My daughter attended Catholic schools, although I'm not Catholic, and she is personally pro-life...but she has voted democratic in every election. I know many Catholics and others who are opposed to abortion on religious grounds who vote based on different issues. Please...we have a big tent here in the democratic party...don't assume that some groups are "out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
121. I don't know....there are some fundies out there
who don't like rapists....I think Karl has gone one step too far.

Sure is hateful, isn't it? Criminals with more rights than women? I don't know....goes against all common sense. And everything Jesus stands for.

I have a theory about rove, reed and norquist...they were all young jerks in the '60's and '70's....the age of Peace, Love and Rock n' Roll. And they all hated it...don't you wonder why? I think this anti-choice thing goes to their hatred of the young women who found some freedom with the Birth Control Pill....and they didn't like it one bit. But I think what they hated more was that none of those young women would share any of that Love, Peace, and Rock n' Roll with them. Just a theory....but their hatred of liberals and women seems so personal....they were more likely to share that Love, Peace and Rock n' Roll with that long-haired cutey in tight jeans...

Just a thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #121
127. Maybe it started with the young women who found freedom with
the birth control still wouldn't sleep with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #127
165. No, I think it was that they were jealous of the men that the young women
got to sleep with because of the new found freedom from the Birth Control pills. :eyes:

Especially Rove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #165
179. A dog wouldn't sleep with Rove
Rove might give the dog syphilis.

That's why his (Rove's) brain is fucked up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #84
171. More importantly than 06 this will be the hot button topic for 08
All of the dumb ass Republicans who get Social Security and Medicare will vote for the Republican just because of one issue, Abortion. Sticking a fork in your own back over one issue, these idiots will deserve what they get when their choice will be either medicine or food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
149. the left also gets very distracted
Liberals go wild and lose track of the goal and in the end lose it all becasue they did not stay united and focused on issues we are winning on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
53. We Haven't Seen Nothin' Yet!
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 07:47 AM by AuntiBush
Literally dreading the days to come. Nothing like perverted attention swaying (don't look over hear at Iran/Nukes), look here at women's rights being stripped taking us many decades backwards. Wondering if thats why the PORT DEAL was tossed at us, tossing us right back into the terra-terra PSTS.

Edited: Can't spell without another cup of coffee - nerves shot from neocons ruining our country - hell the whole damn world every stinkin' day.

Rant over. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #53
117. They're on the short list of states
who will be the first to ban birth control.

People don't realize it- and you can't tell them, but that's what they fundies are (and always have been) after.

As soon as Griswold (the case underlying Roe) is overturned, there will no longer be any federal right to privacy or reproductive freedom. I figure it should take around 2-3 years for that to happen- but at this point it's inevitrable.

Kiss it goodbye, if you live in the so called "Bible Belt" or parts of the Rocky Mountain West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
57. Boy, I did!
Pat Robertson and his ilk have be salivating for this day. I'm surprised all the red states have not done this but am sure many more will follow soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. they are testing Roberts and Alito...
this is the Conservative Litmus test...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. We're talking 2 weeks between states to test the
abortion issue? Since Alito was irresponsibly elected?

I really needed something else to hate this admin for! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I knew this would happen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You're missing the plan! Get several States to ban abortions
contrary to Fed law, and it get's to the SCOTUS! These folks have been waiting for this opportunity for YEARS! They think, now that they have ALito, they have their chance!

They want to overturn Roe, and have for 30+ years!

I don't happen to think it will happen. I think Roberts will vote to uphold, but that's just my gut feeling.

They want this before the SCOTUS THIS YEAR, and they've got enough states to make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. It won't get to SCOTUS that soon.
But it will raise a lot of money. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. I don't know about that. Anna Nichol Smith's hearing before SCOTUS
was today, and I don't think her case is that old.

The eminent domain case was still active in the NE when it was heard and ruled on.

I'm not sure if I want to see it heard very soon or not. In a way, I hope it gets there soon because I think we still have a 5/4 court and I don't want to take the chance that Shrub could nominate yet another SCOTUS. I really just want this thing settled and over.

On the other hand, I'm afraid of what it would mean if the ruling was against Roe. It's still a court where we just don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. If the SCOTUS is going to overturn ROE, I hope they do it about a week
before a major election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
48. She's Been At It For 10 Years
after winding through all the lower courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
75. No Supreme Court immediately
U.S. District Courts and U.S. Circuit Courts are bound by the precedents of Roe v. Wade and its progeny. The U.S. Supreme Court lacks original jurisdiction on the issue of abortion. So cases will be brought in U.S. District Courts by Planned Parenthood or other parties first. These cases will be held and inevitably the state laws will be held unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade and progeny. The cases then go to the Circuit Courts and will go through the same process. Only from there can a losing party appeal, by cert, to the U.S. Supreme Court. The USSC could decline to hear the case right now as well. We just don't know what they will do but it will take some time. I doubt these issues will be before the court earlier than the next term which begins this October. Decisions as far reaching as abortion would be unlikely to be rendered until late in the term which means probably Spring or early summer 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
99. Anna Nicole Smith before the Supreme Court
If that's not a sign of the Apocalypse, I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grrl62 Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
51. exactly
they want it to go to the supremes. and conveniently right before the 2006 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
110. I wish there was something that could be imposed upon men that
was equally as devastating. I just feel so much anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #110
122. There is....but since we live in patriarchy, chances of it
happening are very slim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sunny_Sunshine Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #110
129. Donating blood and organs
This saves lives also so it should be mandatory, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #110
135. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #135
156. that assumes every baby is wanted,. it isn't. no one
should be made to have a baby they don't want. also, there is the fact that men can do contraceptive things but usually won't. that's a 'woman's' burden. never assume a woman imposes anything on herself. especially babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #135
157. Last time I checked, it takes a sperm and an egg for pregnancy
to occur, thus women don't impose pregancy on themselves. Also, birth control does fail occasionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #135
180. How does that work?
When I was date-raped, I didn't "impose" pregnancy on myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
For PaisAn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
130. It's not really so suddenly in a sense
because they've been waiting for this opportunity for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castilleja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
162. Because their time is shortened, and they must rush
these things through before it all crashes down around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. The floodgates have opened...
They clearly feel emboldened right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ban Abortion because Prohibition was such a Success...!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. What the bloody hell?
"There would be no abortions allowed in cases of pregnancy caused by rape or incest."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. the religious right doesn't care about the mental and physical health
of the mother...they don't care...it is all about the fetus ...

They don't care if an 11 year old girl is pregnant by her grandfather....they think its a miracle...it is sick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. It's not about the fetus
But you are right about their lack of caring about the mother. It's about control, pure and simple. Control over your life and an attempt to push down their religion on you. The fetus is nothing more than an excuse.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. the fetus is potential cannon fodder in the neocon wars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Fodder, yes
Excuse, yes. But in no way do they care about anything put pushing their religion down.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
123. Bingo....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
181. If the state can tell a woman she WILL continue the
pregnancy how long will it be before the state can pick the father and how long before the state will determine the WHEN?

This is slavery no question. I for one happen to think slavery trumps murder as a crime. Murder you do once, slavery is murder on a daily basis to the same person over and over everyday.

State butt out!

This (abortion) is between a woman and her doctor, NO ONE ELSE! Not me not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. watch abuse and neglect numbers climb.
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 01:40 AM by xxqqqzme
They will vote to prohibit but there will be no follow-up legislation for pre-natal care; post natal care; children's health care; food; shelter; education or therapy to overcome the abuse & neglect. I hate these people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #40
61. Absolutely right. In fact, these are
the same lunatics who will vote to cut whatever remains of current programs. It seems like they are all pro-life until you are born, after which you are pretty well dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #61
65. How come our politicians aren't saying this??
I have said this for a while - the hypocrisy is disgusting!! I even wrote this in response to a wingnut email, hit reply all, and 3 priests got it.

If you are against abortion, then if you want to be called a Christian, you had damn well better be for the social programs that help poor women with children and not vote for politicians who cut food stamps, health care for families and housing for those in need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
90. They. Don't. Care.
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 03:09 PM by MountainLaurel
After all, their pregnant 12-year-olds will always be able to take a weekend trip to a blue state or to Canada. "Their sort of people" will never have to worry about buying your diabetic son his insulin or paying the electric bill.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
124. And all of the programs for women and children have
been DEfunded....started 5 years ago....check with your state. I, unfortunately, am in Ohio for now....and all of the programs for women have been Defunded....

It's criminal....these pugs are f*cking sadists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
109. Or her fault
for having salaciously tempted the poor old God-fearing man with her evil, slutty, tween-ager ways - the Jezebel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That pisses me off!
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 11:23 PM by BattyDem
:grr:

They always say a woman shouldn't have the choice of an abortion because she made her "choice" when she chose to have sex. But victims of rape and incest DIDN'T make a choice - they had sex forced upon them and now they will have a child forced upon them. Bastards! :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. but but but .. Laura says ...
‘In many countries where girls feel obligated to comply with the wishes of men, girls need to know that abstinence is a choice.’"

This is what they are doing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. She didn't actually say that ... did she?
:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Yes, she did.
http://www.michnews.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/248/11323

LAURA BUSH TO AFRICANS: TRY ABSTINENCE
By J. Grant Swank, Jr.
MichNews.com
Jan 18, 2006




"’I'm always a little bit irritated when I hear the criticism of abstinence, because abstinence is absolutely 100 percent effective in eradicating a sexually transmitted disease,’" Mrs. Laura Bush said.

"’In a country or a part of the world where one in three people have a sexually transmitted deadly disease, you have to talk about abstinence, you really have to,’ she said. ‘In many countries where girls feel obligated to comply with the wishes of men, girls need to know that abstinence is a choice.’"

Mrs. Bush was in Africa for Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf’s inauguration as the first elected female president in Africa.

Reporters asked her why US President George W. Bush and she defended abstinence. One reporter said that it sounded too much like "’Christian moralism.’" That kind of questioning elicited Mrs. Bush sound response.

More at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Unf*ckingbelievable!
Does this woman honestly believe that the men are KINDLY ASKING the women to perform sex and the ONLY reason the women are complying is because they feel obligated??? :eyes:

Just when I think the Bush family can't possibly get any more out of touch with life in the real world, they find a way to do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. I think we need to call these new legal moves
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 12:42 AM by Sydnie
"The Laura Bush Memorial Abstinence Movement" since they don't recognize that a woman might be the victim of force by a stranger, a friend, or a family member.

What do you think ... will it play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #35
49. Nobody Really Cares That Much About Laura, Frankly
It would be embarassing to have to answer repeats of the question: "Laura Who?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. Embarassing to who?
Laura polls higher than blivet** does ... always has. She has come out and publicly said that she thinks having Condi run would be a good idea.

I think you misunderestimate Laura and her possible effect on issues such as this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
46. "obligated" is a soft word
as is the naive statement that the girls have a "choice" as to whether or not comply. Sheez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
73. I guess according to laura, rape is not an issue for these young women
Cause I guess according to Ms. Bush, anytime a girl opens her legs it is because she wants to. I get it now.
Un-furking-believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
87. No, don't quote Pickles.
No. . .no. . .can't take it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. How rapists and child fuckers breed
The GOP needs all the help they can get at the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
58. Well, the reasoning is this
It's not the fetus's fault that his/her father is a criminal. I'm pro-choice but I always thought it was hypocritical to be against abortion unless there is rape or incest. Because if your argument is that the fetus is a life with rights, those rights can't be taken away simply because your father is a criminal. It sort of makes sense. I repeat, I am pro-choice, but I see the logic here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #58
68. Isn't there something in the Constitution about involuntary servitude?
... and why shouldn't it apply to being required to carry and give birth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
74. that protects the southern lineage - they don't want to kill their rw
offspring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
77. Because if the person raped/incest was rich...
....getting an abortion would be a moot point.

This is there way to control the masses. Funny thing is those masses they want to control were elected by the same said masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teenagebambam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
93. To a fundie....
...rape and incest are the woman's fault, the price one pays for being a temptress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
103. Accessory to Rape!
Just think....

First get raped by a rapist and then get raped by the system!

These lawmakers are just as guilty as a rapist!:mad:

Forced birth is like a form of rape!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
115. This makes it quite obvious that their pro-life agenda does not
extend to the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. reply
I wonder how they will actually enforce it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
82. back alley abortions
will be the result, with increased deaths of pregnant women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetle Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #82
125. Will Rita Cosby report on the cute blonde girls....
....who die in the back alleys???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #125
136. My husband says two girls
from his high school class died as a result of back alley abortions. I can't help but wonder what their parents (and parents like them) think about making abortion illegal again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #136
178. This would be an interesting polling question:
- Are you against abortion so that women die having back-alley abortions?
__yes

__no


- Would you be against a woman's right to choose an abortion if it meant more teenage victims of incest dying by trying to abort without the help of a medical profession?
__yes

__no


- Should convicted rapists be allowed to have child visitation and forced to pay child support when the offspring conceived during the commission of their crime is born?
__yes

__no



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
126. They are going after the doctors to enforce it.
Five year sentence for a doctor that performs an abortion. There will be a demand....the fundies will extinguish the supply.

I asked one of the crazy fundies....'what are you gonna do next? Outlaw coat hangers?' And she kinda stood there and thought about it....what stupid, unfeeling sadists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. I said it before and I'll say it again...
to all you Vichy Democrats who have repeatedly told me and other women on this board essentially "not to worry our pretty little heads about it 'cause they'll never actually try to ban all abortions...they need it as a wedge issue"...I hope you all feel like the shit-heels you are. End. Of. Rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You said exactly what I have been feeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Afuckingmen
and anybody who did not speak out against the congressional rollover on this issue owes every woman on DU and in America an apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Right on.
That's exactly why I posted this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I am sick to death...
Hell, I just got off the phone with my guy best friend. He's a good solid liberal Democrat and he's 100 percent on our side on abortion...and even with him when I started talking about being angry at supposedly liberal men for their lack of effort in doing something about the patriarchy that, let's face it, they benefit from...all he wanted to talk about was what women do.

It drives me crazy. Yes...some women suck up to the right-wingers. People who don't have power often react by trying to cozy up to those that do in the vain hope that it will get them some consideration. It doesn't work...but that doesn't stop people from trying.

I'm just really tired of having to pull against those who claim to be on my side. I'm really tired of the conversation always turning so that they don't have to look at their own behavior and motivations. *sigh*

I think it may be time for bed. This is all just circling in my brain and making want to hit someone upside the head with a shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
128. It will never be as big an issue with a man as it is with a woman....
they don't get pregnant. Doctors who have seen what back alley abortions do care....but most of them are getting up in years. I believe women will have to learn to perform abortions. I have seen this coming for a long time. Roe v. Wade will be overturned....and they're going to come after Birth Control Pills next.

I just went out and took a jog to get rid of the anger and frustration that I feel over this. Women will not go back...we will find ways to fight and to counter their sadistic ways. We always have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimjimminy Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #128
138. why?
why will women have to learn to perform abortions?

that makes no sense.

contraception is inexpensive and widely available to all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #138
154. Because they're planning on going after that next n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #138
158. If you are male, you need to get up to speed on
what's going on out there. Viagra is covered by insurance companies, The Pill isn't. The Pill is $40/month from Planned Parenthood....if you are working for $7/hour....$40 is nearly an entire day's wages after taxes.

Contraception doesn't always work.

If laws in states are changed and women can't get abortions if they are raped, then WE WILL HAVE TO PERFORM ABORTIONS....like it used to be in the 'old days.' You know, pre-1973.

OK? The next thing the fundies are going to go after is The Pill....they have always wanted that to be illegal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #138
166. Because contraception is 100% sure, right?
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 03:56 AM by KitSileya
Not. It's not. No method of contraception is 100% secure. Nor do all women use oral birth control before they're raped. Should I, who do not use any form of hormonal BC, ask a rapist to please use a condom before he rapes me, since I won't be able to get an abortion if I should end up pregnant? Or are you suggesting that perhaps I should get a IUD, just in case I might be raped?

But most importantly, your assumption that contraception is inexpensive and widely available to all is false. Surely you can see that yourself? If you are scraping together pennies to get enough to eat, you can't afford BC. If you're a 12-year old being sexually abused by your grandfather, you don't go to the family doctor and ask for contraception.


<edited to add a 0 to get 100%>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #138
182. Because contraception fails sometimes
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 05:04 PM by LeftyMom
ask me how I know (hint: the evidence turns five next month.)

Nevermind, I hate when I resopnd to trolls who are already gone. I should have checked first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I am with you 100%! Any "Democrat" who did not or does not
see this issue as non-negotiable is a traitor to their party and their country - yes their country! This is the most fundamental civil rights issue to ever come before this nation. The idea that you could play loose and easy with this basic right with the fascists in control of our country is worse than stupid - it is criminal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimjimminy Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
141. irresponsible
how could you possibly say that to be a democrat you must be pro-abortion? this is an incredibly irresponsible and ridiculous statement. if all democrats who had questions about abortion-on-demand left the party, where would that leave you?

answer : in a much smaller party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #141
167. but YOU would be in a larger party...
because you are a lurking freeper troll. couldn't resist a comment, huh? does the truth ever break through your skull, or just never on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Reddened for truth
to all you Vichy Democrats who have repeatedly told me and other women on this board essentially "not to worry our pretty little heads about it 'cause they'll never actually try to ban all abortions...they need it as a wedge issue"...I hope you all feel like the shit-heels you are. End. Of. Rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
54. You are quite right about that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
59. A-fuckin-men
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
91. My thoughts exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
96. !
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
114. Could Not Have Said It Better Myself!!!
Just when I think things can't get any worse....:argh: :argh: :argh:

DAMN!!!! I can't take much more from these whack-jobs!!!! :grr:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. So how does this law become enforceable?
Yes, I know that they can imprison doctors, but how does this stop women from having abortions?

I think there's a real class issue at play here. Rich women can travel out of state to have their abortions. Poor ones don't have that option.

So maybe they should make mandatory daily pregancy checks for all women in Mississippi (you can't protect them if you don't know they exist!) and, if pregnant, make the mothers-to-be wear mandatory tracking collars. Women taveling out of state would be required to report to the State Pregnancy Assurance Board upon return, to verify that the blastocyst is still in utero. Missing blastocysts would be referred to the DA to determine if foul play was involved.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
42. Isn't this a problem today too?
I'm pretty sure I saw a thread a while ago, that said that one state was down to 1 (ONE!) abortion clininc for the entire state - and even then, that clinic was being fought. That meant that only upper-class women would be able to go and have an abortion since I doubt that woman, single or not, who is working one or two jobs to make ends meet, would have a hell of a hard time to take two or more days out to get to the single clinic available to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. SD only has one, and they just made abortion illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
64. bingo!
the next foot to drop is passing laws that would make it illegal to cross state lines for the purpose of having an abortion.

that will effectively completely overturn roe v wade. ALL pregnant women who need abortions can not move to ny or ca.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #64
142. The problem with their idiotic thinking is
how are they going to know if someone is pregnant (in the first few weeks/months)
when they cross over State lines?

What, are they going to have mandatory blood/piss tests at the borders?
Are they going to demand that every woman get out of the car and stand sideways?

Fucking ridiculous! I'd tell them to go to hell!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #142
160. That's the point.
How do you enforce this consistantly and fairly? The only way that could be done is to administer daily pregnancy tests and track blasto-citizens from that point on. Ridiculous? Most certainly, but this seems like the only way to show the inherent stupidity of this law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #160
183. They will create a lot more teenage runaways.
If I was a teenager in one of those States and I got pregnant (especially by heinous means)
and I didn't want to have the baby, I would leave the State and never come back.....

I would think that somewhere like California would never participate in that kind of extradition,
that is in fact, if the other Backwoods State ever found out about the pregnancy in the first place.

These guys are going to create way more problems for themselves than they ever had before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
140. Akin to pre-1970's situation, when rich women
could fly to England or (I think) Canada for abortions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. What is wrong with these jackasses? With all the problems
the Gulf Coast is experiencing, they are worried about this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Civil war in Iraq wasn't enough for these shit-heads,
now they are starting one here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
31. Here in Indiana TOO!
A similar bill was introduced in the Indiana legislature this session but as far as I know it's not gone anywhere (and has probably died by now) and our governor, despite how much I abhor him(Bush's fmr. Budget Dir. *itch Daniels), has actually publicly stated that he is not keen to sign such a bill nor use state resources to support the inevitable legal challenges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. Ohio has a bill too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
33. F*ck them! I say ...
ALL women should REFUSE to have sex with their husbands/boyfriends until there is a FEDERAL LAW in place that says a woman has the right to control what happens to her OWN body!!! :grr: :grr: :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. .
The husbands will just rape them and they'll have to carry their pregancies to term. And the law will support the rapist's rights. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Oh damn ... you're probably right
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
94. Yep
And since the legal system in some places assumes that a wife cannot be raped (sex on demand is part of the martial contract, you know), charges probably wouldn't even be brought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #94
105. Oh well, there's always the Bobbitt precident
but they'll probably change that law too.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
155. I envision
many 'ahem' "men" with permanent damage if they try.
Otherwise, separate bedrooms with locking doors will become the new rage in architecture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
39. Just sent a donation to Planned Parenthood
A check to local, and a check to national.

Women and girls will die because of legislation like this, and Bush and the Wingnuts do not give a damn. They do not give a damn.

For * it's about pandering to his base. He gains political advantage and nothing else matters.

For the wingnuts, it's all about control of women's lives in general and women's sexuality in particular. They are fanatics, and fanatics are dangerous, dangerous people.

The death of women and girls does not matter -- all that matters is control and obedience. If you disobey and have unauthorized sex, pregnancy is the visible sign and permanent social punishment for doing so. If you try to abort and you die, that is God's just judgment on your crime. If you get raped, you must have done something to bring it on.

When abortion is criminalized, the penalties are extremely severe. Some DUers think these laws can and will be circumvented by doctors -- they are wrong.

Abortion clinics have already disappeared from nearly all small communities because of violence (ie bombings and murders of docs). In the bad old days, doctors were prosecuted for murder and lost their licenses to practice medicine.

That's what drives it underground and leaves it to non-professionals who may not know or care how to make an abortion safe and sanitary -- they are risking prison for as much money as you can scrape together. That is what is meant by "back-alley" abortions. Women will again bleed to death or die of infection.

But none of that matters if you are a fanatic or a Bush.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. Good move!
We all need to support Planned Parenthood as much as possible in these turbulent times. The religious RW has declared war on women in this country and its time to FIGHT BACK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #39
69. Me, too
If there was ever a time to send $$....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
43. They're driving the wedge home.


I would predict that border states will turn blue not red; if SCOTUS overturns Roe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
45. This makes me want to
slap all the fools who can only sit and dream of a hero rescuing us in the 08 presidential race. How I wish all would realize the importance of their lowly state House and Senate races!!!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
52. Taking Women's Rights Away...
They can't run their own lives, but they've got some warped sense, the auldacity to control a woman's body and life.

There goes decades of progressive evolution. One step forwards for "men of political agendas, and major steps backwards into a sick space and time."

When will the religious fanaticals get they've been had. I think the timing was set to keep our attention off the mid-east crisis.

~ United Methodist Member, here ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
55. So if some sick ass MoFo Father decides to rape his little girl
And she gets pregnant, she'll be forced to have the baby in South Dakota and Mississippi.

Now that is certainly a caring, Christian thing to force on someone who's too young to really understand what's happened/happening to her.

And, rapists have PARENTAL RIGHTS! I saw a movie with Loni Anderson on TV a few years back called The Price She Paid that was about a rapist who got out of jail, then sued to get custody of the son his demented behavior produced.

We're all going to be living in caves again, heating them with an open fire if this continues.

NO ONE - should have the right to tell a woman what to do with her body - PERIOD. Not husbands, boyfriends, or the government. Government needs to get out of our bedrooms, and clean up its own kitchen! DISGRACEFUL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #55
106. Sick but True!!!
And your post is right on!!!

We're going to see some of these perverted old turds wanting to "procreate"
and turn girls and women into breeding cattle, and then take "ownership" of the babies!!!

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
56. What Can We Do?
Who should we write to? Is Planned Parenthood the place to go to track what legislations may be pending? Dear. Lord. We need to shut this down. I'm honestly scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. NARAL
http://www.naral.org/

They are the most effective abortion rights voice out there.

Donate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
63. Great! Let's Make Rape and Incest a Capitol Offense
Punishable by death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
66. Great - they'll all come to Cali or New York for abortions
except the ones who can't afford it. They'll just be stuck with babies they don't want and can't support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
67. Annie Laurie Gaylor is going to run out of vacation states
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 11:25 AM by Sabriel
She was on WI Public Radio this morning asking for a vacation boycott of South Dakota for this very reason.

I'm worried about my daughter's future. I hope she never needs an abortion, but if she does....

(edit missing word)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
70. Once again...
a bunch of old white men telling young women what to do. Does this cover the day after pill.
Every since Scalito's appointment, it has embolden these folks to push for an out and out overturn of Roe v Wade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
71. We're going to end up with people
scurring to different states because of all the different laws. It's going to get crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
98. They're doing it for the same reason south dakota said they did
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 03:41 PM by superconnected
to get it before the supreme court so they over turn roe vs. wade.

People will have to run off to canada. Many pregnant women will be too poor to, so back street abortions will be back in and women will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
72. Democrat Legislature & House
I maybe missing something -- but this is actually an improvement over laws already on the books.

The current law doesn't allow for any abortion at all. It hasn't been enforced since Roe v. Wade, but its still on the books waiting for Roe to be overturned.

I don't see how this will change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PleadTheFirst Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
76. Wow ... and the Dems didn't Fillibuster Alito ...
Because, you know. NO ONE saw THIS shit coming. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #76
139. exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
78. although serious, the timing is Rovian...
A diversion for the election year, to fire up the base, or at least prevent them from crossing over and voting Dem. Will this distract from coverage of Iraq, Plame, wiretapping, etc.? Karl hopes so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #78
85. I'm glad you recognize womens rights as serious
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 02:59 PM by superconnected
but apparently you don't have a clue how serious.

Its far more important than plame or wire tapping. This is an immediate threat and more rights will be taken away by the patriarchy. These rights have only come in the last 40 years, for milennia we didn't have them. If women lose them, we will not get them back easily.

Throwing a few politicians in jail for plame or wiretapping isn't going to recover these rights.

Ignoring that they're being taken away and being indignant that the press is mentioning them, sounds very patriarchial.

I would rather have thieving politicians than united MEN and women who support them, taking my rights to my body, and any womens rights away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #85
100. You misunderstand my message
How can a woman have the freedom to choose an abortion, freedom of reproductive rights, freedom over their bodies, when it's quite possible that ALL OF US, male AND female, risk losing our freedom of speech, of assembly;
They have already chipped away at our rights to due process and privacy, and my point in my message is that Rove et al, may be timing this as a distraction so that they can continue to erode all our rights, and reduce their risk of being thrown out of office.
My point wasn't to emphasize the punishment of the Bush administration, but that we have to protect the entire forest (the Constitution), not just one tree (pro-choice).

We really are on the same side... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
79. I wonder if the Mississippi legislators
will like having to pay child support for a rape victim-because they should have to. Either that, or each one should volunteer to adopt a child that is a product of rape or incest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. She will likely get nothing as welfare isn't on the republicans
compassion list.

Okay, in all fairness she'll get one thing - persecuted for being a single mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. It'll be back to the bad old days
when I was a teen, if a man raped you, they figured it was YOUR fault, because you dressed in a certain way, looked at him funny, etc. etc. I know a woman who was raped by two men and they got off scott free because she was termed "a loose hippy chick".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #83
88. I was a teen in the early 80's
I remember the republicans trying to say a woman couldn't actually be rapped against her will.

And of course them also figthing laws that could charge a husband with rape or wife beating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #88
134. Remember the freeper preacher
who said that if a woman conceived, she wasn't really raped, because during a rape all the liquids dried up? I couldn't believe that. It actually made me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #134
151. Wasn't that the same freak that said
the same thing about incest?
He said that because of the "liquids drying up" that only 1% of incest victims produce a birth?

UGH! Sick psycho-freak!:puke:
With comments like that he must be a perpetrator!:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #83
107. AArrrgggghhhh!!!!
:puke::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
81. It's happening everybody
We have to get ready for this fight.

DAMN IT!!! This is why Alito-buster was so important. These thugs now have everything in the right place. We have to work extra hard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
86. Doesn't the Mississippi Legislature have actual work to do?
Like, oh, I dunno, rebuilding their entire Gulf Coast?! Shame on them for wasting everyone's time with this garbage. They're as useless as Heckuvajob Brownie! :grr: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
borlis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
89. Ladies, time to sharpen your coat hangers.
I am getting so ashamed of what's happening in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
92. All this Abortion HATE will hurt the GOP in November!!!
Most American's Want abortions legal and safe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
95. does this leave out RAPE and INCEST as well?
South Dakota's sweet new bill does.

Basically fuck you for being raped, we only help if your life is in danger.
I didnt think we let shit like this happen in America, its disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. 2nd line of original excerpt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. nope - they wanna force pregnancy on victims of rape and incest.
wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #102
120. very, very bad news
choice is the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
101. these pro coat hanger people are out of control...
so...your daddy gets your pregnant and you're forced to have the baby. That is fucked up beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
104. I wonder how the fathers-to-be are going to feel about this
when as a result of an unintended pregnancy, they end up being responsible for child support for the next 18 years?

Or maybe they figure it can't happen to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #104
108. Lesbians should not be allowed to get an abortion, period.
I mean, what the hell is a right wing fundamentalist christian wedge issue if it doesn't involve gay people?!?!? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
111. You know, I can understand someone being against abortion,
and I can respect that. However, the people who have pushed this are not going to abolish abortion, they are only going to force women to break the law or have unwanted children. If they are really sincere about preventing abortion, sex education, easily available and reliable birth control, and providing programs to help women take care of their babies will have more effect than making abortion illegal. I can't understand or respect that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
113. Wow...they're not wasting any time, are they?
:nuke:

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
116. Will people stand for this?
I think not; and I fear we have violent times ahead of us akin to those of the 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #116
143. My wife and I have discussed the situation in SD and MS and
we are planning to help organize an "underground railroad" to help poor and disadvantaged women receive safe abortions from medical professionals who agree to provide them. (There are many, even in the so-called 'red' states.) Perhaps this will bring on a second Civil War, but my wife and I believe it is important enough to go to jail for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #143
146. You are great Americans.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #146
169. I second that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #169
185. Underground RR
I 3rd it :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
119. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
131. Miss. goes the way of SD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
132. I for one will not stand for this shit!
NO WAY!:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
133. This is not surprising coming from MS
MS was already the state with the most restrictive abortion laws, and they only have
one abortion clinic in the whole state! MS has slowly been eroding Roe v. Wade for
a long time now. The only thing I'm surprised about is that MS was not the first
state to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
137. Boycott Mississippi. No funds for MS Katrina relief (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTorres138 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
144. Yeah, like I really believe that they would abort an incest pregnancy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
145. Want a child? Rape a Mississippi woman.
The state supports you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
147. im tired of abortion being used to elect to idiots who run up deficits
engage in stupid foriegn misadventures (Iraq), and cant stop catastrophic terrorist attacks (9/11). If Roe is overturned some women/girls in certain red states (apparently starting with South Dakota and Alabama) who cant get a ride to a blue state are going to get stuck with a pregancy they don't want. However, most women/girls are going to get that ride. An abortion will no longer be the safe wedge issue it is now for reps. Most women will be enraged and kill the reps at the pols and we will stop electing the idiots i described above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #147
153. Why would abortion stop being a wedge issue?
If Roe is overturned abortion is STILL going to be a wedge issue. The conservatives will say "we have to fight to keep democrats out of office, they'll try to take us back to the days of Roe-v-Wade!"

Abortion IS a wedge issue for all time, whether we're on the winning or losing team. We have to fight to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #153
159. it will cease to be a wedge issue because women will be energized
and enraged when they lose the constitutional right and the reps will be crushed in general elections as a result. An issue is a wedge issue only if it works, and this issue won't work for them the moment the constitutional right is gone. That said, it will still be a tragedy for the poor girls and women in South Dakota, Miss., and elsewhere who for a period of time will not be able to terminate unwanted pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nytemare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
148. This needs to be seriously pushed in the Dem agenda for November
Seriously. Commercials need to bring up women's health as related to the right to have abortion, and that abortions are barely lower in countries where it is banned.

Here is a good link.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
150. Birth control issue
Oh, it's not just the unmarried. They are going to have hell pay from MARRIED people over this birth control issue. No, jerks, being FAITHFUL in marriage is NOT the answer to BIRTH CONTROL or even abortion.

JERKS. YOU pay for all these unwanted kids IN marriage. What this will do is force many more people into STERILIZATIONS: legal or not, unmarried, or not. Bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #150
152. No Shit!
Better to be sterilized than to bring an unwanted child into the world
that you may some day (married or not) end up handing over to THEM!
(in one way or another, especially if they reinstate the draft)

I will not put any child through that!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
161. Just what we need, more gunpowder on the Population explosion.
Instead of 270 million Americans...the Pubs wish for 2 000 000 000 (billion) of us

They might be very happy then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
163. WHEN AND WHERE WILL WE MARCH?
Let's go! I'll be damned if those son of bitches are going to control my body.
Make a date, I'll be there!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
164. These are shaping up to be great days to be a rapist. (sarcasm here)
Plenty of Republican governments are taking pro-rapist stands these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
170. Wonder which state will be next?
Anybody else think all this was planned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teena Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #170
172. Who's next?
I live in ultra-conservative (at least the government) Ohio. I wouldn't be surprised to see Ohio become the next state to ban most abortions.
One thing that many people do not know is that a woman absolutely CAN get pregnant from having sex just once. Actually, in most cases due to the high number of sperm a male produces, that's all it takes.
My sister got pregnant as a teen ager before abortion was legal by having sex JUST ONCE. I got pregnant with each of my kids by having unprotected sex just once with my husband. I know this is true because in the first case, we tried once right before my husband had to go on a business trip. The second time we tried just once and then he got the flu.
When people assume a girl or woman is promiscuous and that's why she got pregnant, I know they are full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #172
174. Yes, they are full of it. I can think of several people, some married,
some not, who got pregnant because of BC failures. two of these cases were because the woman was on BC pills and was taking antibiotics. The doctor and/or pharmacist didn't warn them to use a backup method.

"One thing that many people do not know is that a woman absolutely CAN get pregnant from having sex just once."

I've heard that myself, and I don't doubt it for a minute. How many times do they think is the minimum necessary, that's what I'd like to know?

Sounds like the US could use some televised public service announcements about this. (Yeah, I know that would be a hard sell in the US.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teena Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #170
173. No shit...
I actually heard a woman on the radio say one day that there are so many other countries that have too mny people and that the U.S. dosen't have enough! Doesn't have enough? Who decides this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
175. Once more MEN make the Laws of the Land in an UNWISE MANNER
Ignorance RULES in our America and we know not How to Contend.

We wait for Destiny

For the White Knight

For the Super Candidate to Solve the Probs....

Nay, we need to work on it ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertynell Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
177. Miss. House committee votes to ban most abortions
Margaret Atwood's book "The Handmaids Tale" is
becoming increasingly relevant. This novel presents a
totalitarian theocracy in which "certain" fertile
women are forced to breed children for the state. They are
stripped of all human rights and used as "property."
In light of recent political measures to deny women basic
social, legal & reproductive rights, I would say this book
is prophetic in an Orwellian sense. 

We can and we must stop the onslaught of fundamentalist
repression. It is time for everyone to get  actively involved
before half the US population ends up wearing veils. If I
wrote such a thing a few years ago I would think that I was in
"extremist mode" and now I cannot process the
political madness around me fast enough. I believe this is
similar to what happened in Nazi Germany. -Sane and decent
citizens could not "believe" it was happening,
"couldn't get it" because it was so insane, until it
was too late.
 
I personally am going to get more involved with Code Pink and
there is something every single person who reads DU can do.  I
encourage everyone; especially women who are most directly
impacted by this newest threat to civil liberties, to fight
the attack against Wade vs Roe. 

I am not a political expert and I have a question that someone
might be able to answer for me. If the day comes when George
Bush is impeached, indicted and understood to be the unlawful
president that he is; can his appointments to the Supreme
Court, be challenged?  What legal protections exist to protect
the people against a rogue Supreme Court? By rogue, I mean a
Supreme Court that does not reflect the mainstream of the
American people nor their best interests but instead panders
to special interest groups.

This is my first posting and I wish to thank the brave people
who have created and support DU.

liberty nell

 

  

    
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerebral_Assassin Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
186. The troops are already mobilizing
the troops are beginning to get their orders.

http://www.afa.net/abortionban.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC