Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistan forces hit militants on Afghan border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:25 AM
Original message
Pakistan forces hit militants on Afghan border
MIRANSHAH, Pakistan (Reuters) - Pakistani helicopter gunships and ground forces attacked a militant hideout near the Afghan border on Wednesday killing up to 30 people, according to a senior official in the North Waziristan tribal region.

Sayed Zaheerul Islam, the top government administrator in North Waziristan, said between 25 and 30 foreign fighters and tribal militants had been killed and more wounded in the assault on Danda Saidgai, a village about 15 km (10 miles) north of Miranshah, the region's main town.

~snip~

But a witness at Danda Saidgai said he saw helicopters attack houses where women and children lived. Others said a backlash against the army action was brewing in Miranshah, the region's main town.

There has been mounting anger among Pashtun tribes over the conduct of the war on terrorism which has resulted in Pakistani deaths and occasionally violations of Pakistani territory like the U.S. airstrike on the Bajaur tribal agency that killed 18 people in early January.

The latest Pakistani military operation came hours before U.S. President George W. Bush made a stop in Afghanistan at the start of trip that will also take him to India and Pakistan.

more:http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060301/wl_nm/pakistan_attack_dc;_

Wonder if there is any connection to * earlier statements about OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe.
My take is that the newspaper editors are sensitized to certain stories for completely odd reasons. * is in S Asia. Therefore, they must run stories from the area. This is a large strike, but they happen every few weeks. They run more often in the Pakistani press.

Musharraf has no love for the militants in the area. They've made at least one attempt on his life, and create lots of grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I posted this today on another DU topic
You might find it an interesting article.

He's Welcome in Pakistan



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's true.
Pakistan's a mess, but when you look at all the options, it's just a question of what position to be in when you're screwed.

The areas where the militants established themselves were, and are, pretty much backwards xenophobes where pashtunwali reigns supreme: distinguishing it from Islam after 1000 years of interaction is pretty tough. Pakistani troops had never entered the area, and pashtunwali said that jihadis and good Muslims were welcome and protected. Pitch in some money, and voila: you've bought and paid for them, and get wives in return. America and the Jews and the secularists are all enemies: they'd reduce the clans' power, infringe on their land, and violate the customs and religion that must be universal--and if people haven't reverted to Islam yet, well, they need help, it could only be a conscious choice.

Drugs are a big no-no. But, hey, Muslims won't use them, sort of by definition. So who cares?

Send in outsiders to get the militants: the locals go more extremist. Don't send in outsiders to get the locals: you go more extremist. Find the kinds of people that *could* go in without alienating the locals and send *them* in, and all you've done is ship more extremists into the area. The way they do it: go in and kill a few, put on pressure for the militants to declare a truce, one that can be repudiated at will, sucks.

I haven't seen a suggestion that would seem to work; the best bet, IMHO, is to track down the militants, kill them, and then let the anger rage until it dies down. If you get a new generation of militants, well, you're no worse off. But that's a really sucky solution, and I think it's "best" only because the other choices are even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's for show
All timed for Bush's visit to the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC