Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mubarak Warns U.S. Not to Attack Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:29 AM
Original message
Mubarak Warns U.S. Not to Attack Iran
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 10:29 AM by cal04
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak strongly advised the United States not to attack Iran, warning that military action would create more terrorists in neighboring Iraq, according to comments published Wednesday. Mubarak also told Egyptian newspaper editors he warned Vice President Dick Cheney that ground troops "will have a hard time" in such a conflict. "If an airstrike (against Iran) takes place, then Iraq will be turned to terror groups," Mubarak was quoted as saying by the daily Al-Gomhouria.

He said Shiite Muslims in the Gulf region also could turn against the United States because "Iran generously provides for Shiites in every country and these people are ready to do anything if Iran is
attacked." Listen to my advice for once," he recalled telling Cheney in English. "You have vital interests in the Gulf region, especially oil."

The United States and other Western governments suspect that Iran's nuclear research program is a cover for weapons development and fear that Tehran is seeking to build an atomic bomb. Tehran insists it only wants to generate electricity. International negotiations over the crisis are under way. Mubarak said he hoped the issue would be resolved peacefully. When asked, he said it was unlikely Israel would launch a nuclear attack against Iran "because Iran owns ballistic missiles that it will launch against Israel and there will be huge destruction."

Mubarak added that such an attack also would spark revenge from Iraqi groups, extremists religious parties and organizations such as the Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon. Mubarak spoke to the editors on his way back from a tour of Gulf states, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060301/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_us_iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even Daddy couldn't dissuade Lord Pissypants from going into Iraq
I doubt anything Mubarak says will change anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Letters to the editor in the NY Times this morning
likened the danger from Iran getting the bomb to the danger of Nazi Germany in 1938; most people didn't expect Germany to initiate wars of aggression but they did. If this is how the Bush adminsitration views Iran, as a threat of that order, we are in bad trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That is an overly simplistic view and dead wrong.
The advent of the A-bomb changed the dynamics of would be aggressor nations. If and when Iran aquires the A-bomb they also aquire the possibility of it being used to wipe them off the face of the planet if they start invading their neibors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You are right. It's not a view I agree with,
but I wanted to point out those letters as representing a view that is held by many. And again, if that is the view of our war planners, that Iran is a gathering danger that needs to be countered even if it means war, we are in trouble.

I agree with the notion that if Iran acquires the bomb, all that would result is a regional cold war (Iran/Arab states; Iran/Israel). Iran might intensify a terrorism campaign (low-level war by proxy) against Israel, but not so much as to provoke open warfare with Israel since that would be too dangerous. Eventually, in the absence of American interference, the Iranian leadership would be replaced or become moderate (because the Iranian public resents the totalitarian religious regime). American interference (including threats of war) has the counterproductive effect of driving the Iranian people towards their leadership. Unfortunately, our leadership is ignorant and unprincipled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Certain self-interest implied...
Mubarak own dictatorship might ignite and Mubarak might have to fight a 'war on terrorism' in his own country--afterall, Egypt is a good ally of the both the US and Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly
Mubarak's pro-Bush, semi-dictatorial regime would be one of the dominos to fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. fight a 'war on terrorism' in his own country
He already is, at least in his view. The dictatorship retains its hold on power throught the brutal suppression of the islamist political opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. The AP wire actually has a funnier headline --as in:
Mubarak Tells U.S. Not to Attack Iraq 10:19 a.m. ET

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak strongly advised the United States not to attack Iran, warning that military action would create more terrorists in neighboring Iraq, according to comments published Wednesday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Let Russia handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Flashback Mubarack also begged Lord Pissipants NOT to attack
Iraq... and he was right too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. He was indeed
"Mr Mubarak told students in Alexandria that many innocent Iraqis would be killed, and that an attack had the potential to destabilise the whole region...They do not buy the argument - put forward by Mr Cheney in his forceful speech on Monday - that toppling Saddam would enhance America's ability to make peace between Israel and the Arabs....In addition, a new war might destabilise Iraq, or even the region as a whole. It might produce fresh recruits for Osama Bin Laden and Islamic extremism."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2219775.stm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheModernTerrorist Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. that IS what they want, basically
to destabilize the region in order to keep everyones' minds off of the crumbling economy, the gutting of everything from laws social programs... all in an effort to keep our minds on terrorism, while stealing money out from under our noses and perpetuating the myth of imminent danger until it becomes a reality...

...that sounds about right to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ouch, so much for war in March!
Got to get India fully on board first. Pakistan would be a bonus, as well as Turkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC