Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolton Discredits Iran Weapons Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:42 PM
Original message
Bolton Discredits Iran Weapons Report
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3380659,00.html



WASHINGTON (AP) - A report by U.N.
investigators that they have found no evidence of
an Iranian nuclear weapons program ``is simply
impossible to believe,'' Undersecretary of State
John R. Bolton said Wednesday.

Bolton said Iran has enriched uranium with both
centrifuges and lasers and has produced and
reprocessed plutonium.

``It attempts to cover its tracks by repeatedly
and over many years neglecting to report its
activities and in many instances providing false
declarations to the IAEA,'' Bolton said in a speech
at a dinner of The American Spectator magazine.

The U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency
said in a report this week that Iran had been
involved in numerous cases of covert nuclear
activities, including uranium enrichment and the
production of small amounts of plutonium that
effectively put the nation in violation of the
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here we go again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Iran outsmarted the US
By admitting to past errors, mistakes, omissions, Iran has gotten itself out of immediate trouble with the IAEA. They outmaneuvered the US. I sincerely hope that John Bolton develops an ulcer as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Could also be IAEA,...
,...wants to avoid its past mistakes in inadvertently providing fuel feeding those PNAC pursuers. Ya know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Really......anyone surprized here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bolton Discredits Iran Weapons Report
If Bolton wants to discredit the report, he should agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree
Bolton is a thorough discredit to the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. fantasy world or cynical maneuvering?
Is it possible these guys are living in a world of dark fantasy, that they are so deluded by their visions of fear and paranoia that they are INCAPABLE of understanding the world as it really exists?

Or is this just a cynical maneuvering on the part of the neocons, part of their plot to subvert democracy and cow dissent at home by making us very afraid?

I really hope that the second option is what's going on, because if they are really so deluded as to believe all of this we are in for deep deep trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Perkowski discredits Bolton's cheap rug; news at 11
Edited on Wed Nov-12-03 08:12 PM by thebigidea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. lol love it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCDemo Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Seems to me he doesn't know what the %&@* he is talking about
They'be been there and they report they found no evidence. How can he repudiate that? He hasn't been there on the ground!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't this the same John Bolton
who guaranteed WMDs in Iraq?

Oh nothing to see here, move along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. and who essentially got kicked out of the NKorea talks
for his extremely bellicose and provocative public statements. Had to get CHINA to get the talks back on track with the US agreeing that Bolton would be kept AWAY from the talks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's complaining about UN inspectors...what about KAY!
Bush*s own weapons expert and a team of 1500 couldn't find even TRACES of WMD in Iraq.
Why isn't Bolton complaining about Kay's ineptitude? Why isn't he demanding Bush appoiont someone who knows where to look?

Bolton, wolfowits, Cheny, Rumsfeld, Bush et al are War Criminals deserving of world court justice. Or, enemy combatants who should be whisked away in the dead of night to a Gitmo-type compound in Iraq or Syria to be held forever for their crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. U.S. attacks IAEA report on Iran - TGM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here's the reply: UN rejects US criticism of Iran nuclear report
The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, on Thursday rejected US criticism of its report on Iran's nuclear programme.

SNIP

However, a spokesman for the Vienna-based agency said on Thursday: "We stand by the report, but it's confidential and will be considered at next week's (IAEA) board meeting."

SNIP

A western diplomat in Vienna said the failures cited by the report bolstered the US position that Iran was in violation of its nuclear obligations and should be referred to the UN Security Council.

But given the admissions by Iran and the agreement on co-operation it reached last month with the foreign ministers of the UK, France and Germany, he said the 35-member board of the IAEA would resist any US attempt to raise the diplomatic pressure.

"In some ways the report is so damning that it strengthens the US position but in other ways it weakens it because Iran is now doing things and other board members might say let's not spook them," said the diplomat.

SNIP

Some more: http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1066565853261&p=1012571727102
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. it seems like we are trapped in an unending set of repeating words
like blast:

US blasts report...

and reject:

UN rejects assertion...

and deny:

China denies claims...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC