Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: N.Y., Calif. Air Is Dirtiest, EPA Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:21 AM
Original message
LAT: N.Y., Calif. Air Is Dirtiest, EPA Says
N.Y., Calif. Air Is Dirtiest, EPA Says
March, 22 2006

LOS ANGELES -- New Yorkers and Californians breathe the dirtiest air in the nation and face higher cancer risks than the rest of the nation, according to the latest data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

New Yorkers' risk of developing cancer from air toxins is estimated to be 68 residents per million. In California, the risk is 66 residents per million.

The national average is 41.5 per million, according to the report, which was released in February and based on emissions of 177 chemicals in 1999, the most recent data available.

Oregon, Washington, D.C., and New Jersey had the third, fourth and fifth worst air in the nation, respectively, the EPA said. Rural residents of Wyoming, South Dakota and Montana breathed the cleanest air.

The EPA assessment evaluated toxins including heavy metals, such as lead; volatile chemicals, such as benzene; combustion byproducts, such as acrolein; and solvents, including perchloroethylene and methylene chloride....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top14mar22,0,6478045.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republican governors.
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 10:29 AM by Rose Siding
Boring old Davis the Democrat had an emissions plan that gained international praise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. have nothing to do with it...
sure, the idiotinator is there a couple years and the air goes to shit.....

Why isn't South Carolina on the list then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because they don't have the industry
or the population.

Davis' plan was more stringent than Kyoto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought CA had strict enviro laws already...
but the sheer number of cars and number of people trump that I guess....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's not just the cars. it's the agriculture.
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 11:42 AM by stopbush
BION, the main source of pollution in the San Joaquin Valley is cow farts, ie: methane gas
from livestock. When the air quailty reports speak of "particulate matter," well, you
try not to think about what that means.

In addition, the prevailing winds blow from the Pacific coast inland, and the
stale air from Rt 99 westward gets trapped in the SJ Valley when it hits the Sierras.

Last summer was brutal temperature-wise and should have been one of the worst on
record for air quality, but for some reason, it turned out to be one of the best. The SJV
almost met the CA standards. Go figure.

I'm interviewing for a job in LA Friday. The air down there is actually better than the air I'm breathing
in the central valley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Air Is Cleaner in the Bay Area
and LA is a lot cleaner than it used to be.

The air in the Central Valley keeps getting worse though.
Maybe the Freepers have been buying Hummers while we've been buying Priuses.

Forest fires have something to do with it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I've seen very few Hummers around here. Who can afford them?
On the flip side, Vegas was Hummer Central...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Things were actually improving in LA until.....
....they had to roll back the standards a few years ago, thanks to the Bush-assisted faux energy crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. New York, California worst for U.S. pollution
POSTED AT 10:57 AM EST ON 22/03/06
New York, California worst for U.S. pollution
Associated Press

Los Angeles — New Yorkers and Californians breathe the dirtiest air in the United States and face elevated cancer risks because of it, according to the latest data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

New Yorkers' risk of developing cancer from air toxins is estimated to be 68 residents per million. In California, the risk is 66 residents per million.

The national average is 41.5 per million, according to the report, which was released in February and based on emissions of 177 chemicals in 1999, the most recent data available.

Oregon, Washington, D.C., and New Jersey had the third, fourth and fifth worst air in the United States, respectively, the EPA said. Rural residents of Wyoming, South Dakota and Montana breathed the cleanest air.
(snip/...)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060322.wpollut0322/BNStory/International/home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. New York and California
anti-smoking laws are working miracles!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess that's why those EPA jerks want to exempt....
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 02:36 PM by pinniped
power companies from installing new pollution control devices.

It all makes sense to me.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. where's Texas in this
did they not bother to look at Texas?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC