Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington worried about a GM bankruptcy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:59 PM
Original message
Washington worried about a GM bankruptcy
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=42a2a6b58ab8f473

Washington is worried that General Motors Corp.'s big layoff program could lead to the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. getting swamped.

The financially ailing carmaker offered early retirement buyouts worth as much as $140,000 per person to 113,000 workers Wednesday.

Many observers wonder if the move is calculated to prepare GM for bankruptcy.

Barry Bosworth, a Brookings Institution economist who advised U.S. President Jimmy Carter, called the early retirement buyouts a prelude to bankruptcy.

snip...

With GM's pension obligations underfunded by about $31 billion, a bankruptcy could swamp the overburdened PBGC.
more...

This company is a viable company with great workers ...its management sucks!!! and now America has to bail them out... I blame Congress!!! and BUSH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rmgarrette64 Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sarcasm?
I'm not sure I get it. If the management sucks, why is Congress or Bush to blame? Was it a sarcastic comment?

I don't know enough of what's going on at GM to comment, so just asking.

R. Garrett
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Fat cat management has gutted GM for decades resulting in
stultifying business practices. Why is Congress or Bush to blame? They're not to blame, they're partners in the same parallel universe= We HAFTA to NAFTA and CAFTA so we can all stay rich and Americans can all stay poor paying for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes Cafta Nafta and just sat back and watched GM fail
when they could have encouraged instead of gas guzzling Escalades get mandatory gas reduction vehicles like Toyota...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's one great thing about discussion boards.
There is no easy way to distinguish between error and satire. Some errors that would deceive an audience of listeners will provoke an audience of readers to think or laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Management sucks alright
But it is because many workers who are idle are getting paid for doing crossword puzzles and learning how to play Trivial Pursuit at the moment in their "schools"; management should have set up retraining programs for future work. Meantime, the executives are worried about how to save their options and parasails, and we all pay for the problems.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. GM Mgt Bet The Company on Selling More Huge SUVs -- Again! As Gas > $3
There's DUMB. There's DUMBER. And there's senior management at GM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevekatz Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. it's more
complicated then just that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. How Much More Complicated Can It Be?
They were banking on a quick and successful takeover of Iraq's oil fields,
leading to lower gas prices for years to come, and Americans celebrating the
low gas prices by buying huge gas-guzzlers. Some GM execs would have been in
that "energy task force" meeting in 2001 where they divvied up Iraq's oil fields,
so they figured they had the inside scoop.

But when the invasion turned into a total clusterfeep, they stayed the course,
heading straight for the rocks. They're still heading that way, and the rocks
are now plainly visible and not very far away. They still think they can sell
bigger and bigger SUVs, even with thousands of them rusting on dealers' lots.

It would be absurd (though quite Republican) to blame the workers and their unions
for negotiating a decent wage and pension. If you keep on building what nobody
wants, it doesn't matter what your cost structure looks like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've got news for anyone who's wondering....
Will they or won't they?

Answer = GM will file for bankruptcy. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind. They will file because they want to get out from under their pension obligations.

They will dump their workers. Then, management will sit back and add up the numbers. There will still be plenty left.

GM will reorganize. They'll start up again, and the shafted workers will have to go to the federal government for some kind of pension guarantee.
The problem is, that program is now overburdened because other companies were there before them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I agree
The writing was on the wall ever since United Airlines was given this out. Plenty of corporations will take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. So, is it better for those workers
to go ahead and take the buyout? Get their money now before this happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Hard to tell, Del.
If I was affected by this, here's what I would do: I would get on the phone and find out what my options are. Check with management, double check to make sure that what I was being told is correct.

I would probably meet with some HR person, to try and assess the situation as closely as I could. What's the rumour? Do things look OK for now? (maybe they won't tell the whole story, but at least I would get some clues). What are my friends doing? Are they taking the buyout, or are they planning to wait?

Next, I would start listening to the "jungle drums" to find out what's really going on. I'd check the Internet. Check the stock. That tells you a lot.

I say this with some authority because I belong to an organization called CMA (certified management accountants). About 3 years ago, we found out through the grapevine that many companies were planning to get out of their pension obligations. In other words = file bankruptcy, dump their employees, and start over. Sure enough, it's happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. No worries! The Federal Reserve will just start printing more money
And they'll make more money for themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Planted story???
Things are not adding up here. GM is not broke(money wise). They would like you to think they are, but they have many resources. Allison Transmission and Raytheon alone would pay these pensions. If they cut the salaries of the CEOs then they would have even more money, but this is not likely. The SUV(new Hummer) they are building has a smaller engine that the older model. The gas mileage is much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Shhhhh....don't tell anyone that!
They might start thinking for themselves and stop listening to the B$ from Wall Street and the American sorta-kinda-free-press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. well pre-W the US treasury might have been able to help out
another ailing automaker with loans like the ones made to Chrysler (and paid back EARLY by them) in the 80's. But unfortunately, some war-mongering regime has seized control of our government, drained the treasury on foreign adventures, and so that is probably not a possibility this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC