Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal judge appointed to FISA court ("former Whitewater prosecutor")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:26 PM
Original message
Federal judge appointed to FISA court ("former Whitewater prosecutor")
3/24/2006, 1:59 p.m. ET
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. District Judge John D. Bates has been named to replace a judge who resigned from the secretive court set up by Congress to oversee domestic spying.

Bates, a former Whitewater prosecutor, was appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts in February to replace U.S. District Judge James Robertson, who quit shortly after news reports about the Bush administration going around the court to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens suspected of communicating with terrorists.

The appointment was not announced by the court. Secrecy News reported the appointment Friday after it appeared in Bates' official online biography. <snip>

Bates was named to the federal bench in 2001 by President Bush. Prior to joining the court, Bates worked as a private practice attorney. From 1995 to 1997, he was an assistant U.S. attorney who wored for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr on the investigation into President Clinton's Whitewater investment deals. <snip>

http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/politics/index.ssf?/base/politics-3/114322739449570.xml&storylist=washington



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lostnote06 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Chief Justice Roberts sailed through confirmation.......
.....Men/Women with Titles Of British Nobility sure can stick together when protecting the interests of American values......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Welcome to DU, Lostnote06!
:hi:



We're seeing even more stacking of the deck in favor of the Propagandist and further movement toward the establishment of a plutocracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote06 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks , its good to be back...
.....btw, how many posts are required before I can post a topic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hmm...I can't remember. The FAQ doesn't say either.
How many posts do I need to start a new thread, etc?

New members are restricted from starting new discussion topics. We require you to first post responses to a few existing discussion threads before you are given the privilege to do so. We wish we did not have to enforce this rule, but we have found it very helpful to keep disruptors off of our message board. Please do not ask what the minimum number is; we won't tell you, and it's not very high. New members are similarly restricted from using the private messaging function or recommending topics for the Greatest Page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote06 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. N/P....Thank You.....actually I'm not new
..........I have been viewing DU since 2000 but did not sign up until a year or two later.......During my yr or so absence from DU I have experienced the unfavorable side of eminent domain and wish to discuss this issue in particular....thanks and have a good evening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ah, well, go kick some threads and get your count up
;)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Totally unacceptable...all Bush judges are illegitimate. Resign! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Everything about these rat bastards is illegitimate.
They don't know when to quit, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, that typo they put in there! Freudian slip or subversive typesetters?
"... he was an assistant U.S. attorney who wored for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr ..."

I know how I'd pronounce that one (slip in an H)! :rofl:

Covering all their bases, aren't they!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah! I was thinking to myself
that a letter was missing, but it sure wasn't a 'k'. Hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. no kidding. best part of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. a slap in the face of all that is respectable
and yet another demonstration of the complete contempt this criminal administration has for the judicial process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Also explains why Bush avoided using FISA court
The judge had integrity, clearly not someone Bush could work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Network of Corrupt BushPutinist "Judges" widens
I have always said that the judiciary has been by and large the most resistant branch of government to the death of integrity that BushPutinism brings as it spreads like a cancer.

But I think even this institution is about to fall to the Nazi/Soviet level...maybe a bit slower than the rest of the Empire, but no less thoroughly, in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. We all would rather that such judges not be put on the FISA
panel. Yet, regardless of the makeup of the FISA court, it would still be better if Bush would stop breaking the law and get the warrants from the court. At least there would be a written record of who is being surveiled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. An extreme rightwing
asslicker, why am I NOT surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. "Secrecy News?"
Where can I get a copy of that?

I won't tell anybody. I promise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Anybody for ""Secrecy News?"
I double-promise-swear I won't reveal it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. FISA court? Why bother?
I mean if the prez has all the authority that he claims to have... why even bother w/ the FISA court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Secrecy News. Secrecy News.
Secrecy News
from the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy

http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/


Never mind. Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. TY - lots to read through on there! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. and he still doesn't get warrants
this is very suspicious!!! Republicans he is spying ON YOU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC