Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia Denies Giving U.S. Intel to Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:26 AM
Original message
Russia Denies Giving U.S. Intel to Iraq
MOSCOW - Russia on Saturday denied that it provided information on U.S. troops movements and plans to Baghdad during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Interfax news agency reported.

"Similar, baseless accusations concerning Russia's intelligence have been made more than once," Interfax quoted Foreign Intelligence Service spokesman Boris Labusov as saying. "We don't consider it necessary to comment on such fabrications."

An unclassified Pentagon report released Friday cited two confiscated Iraqi documents as saying the Russians collected information from sources "inside the American Central Command" and that battlefield intelligence was provided to then-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein through the Russian ambassador in Baghdad.

The report also said the Russian government had sources inside the American military command as it planned and executed the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

more;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060325/ap_on_re_eu/russia_us_iraq_war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the whole thing is a plot to discredit Russia heading
into the UN Security council meetings about Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with you
the timing of the release of documents is suspect, IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should just say publicly that it was a cooperative disinfo operation
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 05:36 AM by leveymg
Army Brig. Gen. Anthony Cucolo of U.S. Joint Forces Command told a briefing he viewed Russia's decision to give intelligence to Saddam's government as "driven by economic interests." The report noted Russian business interests in Iraqi oil.

The revelations were contained in a report by the U.S. military's Joint Forces Command assessing the Iraqi view of events in the opening months of the war, from March to May 2003, based on interviews with senior Iraqi officials and captured documents.

The report said a document sent to Saddam on March 24, 2003, stated, "The information that the Russians have collected from their sources inside the American Central Command in Doha is that the United States is convinced that occupying Iraqi cities are (sic) impossible, and that they have changed their tactic," to avoid entering cities.

The report said this kind of information was "only one of the fog-generators obscuring the minds of Iraq's senior leadership."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060324/pl_nm/iraq_usa_russia_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. While in the meantime
the troops couldn't even tell their families where they were located or where they were going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is someone trying to re-heat the "cold war" again?
If the Russians have sources inside the American Central Command the Pentagon has larger problems than a few leaks. Wouldn't it be great if the "cold war" war on again? Just think of the money we could cut from social services to give to the Pentagon then! Wow! :wow: The "war on terra" AND the "red menace" all at once! The brass in Washington would be coming in their pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. more fake documents. nobody believes them anymore
boo hoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. When was the last time we got the truth from out gov't about anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I guess that explains it!
I always wondered how we were stymied by the Iraqi Air Force and Navy.

Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Are they just throwing this type of crap out there to distract from the
AIPAC case? Don't Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman head for court in April, assuming the judge doesn't toss it out.

It's amazing how the Repubs flip-flop on their meme of "9-11 changed everything". One minute they are screaming that Dems have a pre-911 mentality, the next their pooh-poohing the security concerns regarding the ports deal. Now they say that Rosen and Weissman haven't done anything that's not been part and parcel in DC for ages...and here I thought 9-11 changed everything. :eyes:


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/3746884.html

snip>

The law's defects are exacerbated because they infringe on the former lobbyists' constitutional rights to lobby the government and because prosecutors are seeking to criminalize conduct that is part and parcel of Washington politics _ namely, leaks of classified information.

Rosen's lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said it is fundamentally unfair that "one day the government stops the music and says you've now crossed the line," when for decades such conduct has been considered acceptable.

The indictment against Rosen, of Silver Spring, Md., and Weissman, of Bethesda, Md., alleges that they conspired to obtain classified government reports on issues relevant to American policy, including the al-Qaida terror network; the bombing of the Khobar Towers dormitory in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 U.S. Air Force personnel; and U.S. policy in Iran.

snip>

A former Defense Department official, Lawrence A. Franklin, pleaded guilty to providing Rosen and Weissman classified defense information and was sentenced to more than 12 years in prison. Franklin has said he was concerned that the United States was insufficiently concerned about the threat posed by Iran and hoped that leaking information might eventually provoke the National Security Council to take a different course of action.


12 years, seems kinda light for passing US defense information, especially after 911, doesn't it? Wonder if he cut some deals on that guilty plea. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC