U.S. Won't Seek Seat on U.N. Rights Panel

U.S. Won't Seek Seat on U.N. Rights Panel
Washington's decision eliminates its chance to help shape the body in its crucial first year.
By Maggie Farley, Times Staff Writer
April 7, 2006

UNITED NATIONS — The United States will not seek a seat on the new U.N. Human Rights Council this year, the State Department said Thursday, a decision that underscores its disappointment with the framework of the panel but also eliminates an opportunity to help shape it in its crucial first year.

The Bush administration's decision marks the first time that the U.S. has not sought a seat on the U.N.'s premier human rights body since the world organization was formed after World War II. It was apparently made in part because of fear that Washington, under scrutiny by human rights investigators for its treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and Abu Ghraib, Iraq, might not have won a seat in a vote of the General Assembly.

"The United States will work cooperatively with other member states to make the council as strong and effective as possible," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said in Washington. He added that the U.S. would fund and support the body and probably would seek a seat next year.

Although the U.S. initially pushed to create the council, it stood virtually alone last month in seeking to reject it in a 170-4 General Assembly vote. U.S. officials said the manner in which the council was set up did not do enough to keep rights abusers off the panel. The previous Human Rights Commission was often criticized for including countries with poor human rights records, which helped them avoid the council's censure.
(snip/...)

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-rights7apr07,1,6984019.story?coll=la-headlines-world

ok, they are not TRYING for a seat because they probably would LOSE a vote to get on? such are the fruits of bolton's ham-handed approach to 'diplomacy'.