Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush acknowledges declassifying Iraq intelligence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:55 AM
Original message
Bush acknowledges declassifying Iraq intelligence

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/10/AR2006041000517.html

Bush acknowledges declassifying Iraq intelligence

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush acknowledged on Monday he ordered the declassification of parts of a prewar intelligence report on Iraq to respond to critics.

But Bush said he could not comment on an assertion that he authorized Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, to release the information to reporters. Libby is accused of obstruction of justice and perjury in an investigation designed to discover who leaked the name of a CIA operative.

"I will say this, that after we liberated Iraq, there was questions in peoples' minds about, you know, the basis upon which I made statements, in other words, going into Iraq," Bush said in his first words on the subject since it flared up last week.

...

"I wanted people to see what some of those statements were based on. I wanted people to see the truth. I thought it made sense for people to see the truth. That's why I declassified the document," he said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Arrest the Traitor
No more bullshit spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. From a secret regime, they wanted everyone to know the truth?
Does anyone believe this BULL SHIT?

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. truth used by bush twice in his comment. Not bad!


"I wanted people to see what some of those statements were based on. I wanted people to see the truth. I thought it made sense for people to see the truth. That's why I declassified the document," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Unfortunately, he was lying again
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 05:29 PM by donkeyotay
After the Serial Liar made the SOTU speech, Hadley gave a press conference and said it was his fault that the bad information got in the speech. They said the 16 words did not belong in the SOTU. Therefore, it makes no sense to declassify a document for "people to see the truth" about something they had already admitted was not true.

Nice try at truth telling, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. The flim-flam man gets flimsier all the time
I'm trying to decide whether I want to watch him twist in the wind for another 2.75 years or if it would be more fun to impeach him...Just kidding, impeach this fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah right GW, just like you got a hot line right to god.
Then why did you "leak" the information instead of holding one of your photo ops and telling the public? More lies and cover-ups par normal shrub politicking. Republican= party of liers and cover-your-own butts at the cost of others. Slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who reviewed the declassification?
Who reviewed the declassification to be sure that sources and methods were not compromised?

Huh? Huh? Huh?

:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. If he doesn't go through the review process, it's not declassification.
It's revealing classified information. It's a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. We KNOW he declassified the summary of claims.
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 11:05 AM by Kagemusha
That's the part that was public for quite some time.

He declassified not "the document", but one part of the document.

The others, including the part Libby leaked to Judith Miller, are STILL CLASSIFIED.

That at least, is my understanding, and until the media gets to the (censored) bottom of it, I can only assume Bush is engaging in doubletalk to make it appear that he authorized the declassification of the parts Libby leaked, i.e. the body of the text.

Edit: And he damned well never declassified the annex which probably has lots of stuff about intelligence sources & methods. If he thinks the summary is the entire document then.. ... no, not even with this being him, I will not believe such a ridiculous thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. HAHA, Liberated Iraq?
He's such a f'ing liar...he may have cherry picked parts of the document to declassify, but only the parts that he felt helped his case and according to the NYT article yesterday...they were either disproved or discredited before he continued to use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Now you say you declassified. My ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicofaraby Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. But if it was "de-classified..."
Why didn't he tell the judge in the Judith Miller case that "fact?"

Obstruction of justice seems an appropriate charge....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. ermm, and how exactly..
.. is Iraq "liberated" when it is now in the yoke
of a terrible civil war and one USA stupidity
after another?

Answer on a postage stamp please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jseankil Donating Member (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Someone really needs to ask him what he means by liberated
I realize he doesn't watch the news as he has admitted to that but does he really not understand that removing Saddam from power does not equal liberation? What the hell is his definition of liberated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "Liberated". That really burns my cork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. But the document does not support the uranium theory.
Is he just lying to our faces about a document that right in front of us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought he knew nothing of the leak, was gonna go after the leaker,...
,...and all that.

The man is such a freakin' liar and a fraud and,...a common criminal. Why. the. hell. is. he. still. in. charge?

ARGH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. So he admits to exposing Brewster Jennings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. However...................
"I wanted people to see the truth" and "I did not have sex with that woman"..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. AP Bush Says He Declassified Pre-War Intel


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cia_leak;_ylt=Alpwd.1Wmfy4x4kbyUqrf36s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
Bush Says He Declassified Pre-War Intel

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 25 minutes ago

WASHINGTON -
President Bush said Monday that he declassified sensitive prewar intelligence on Iraq back in 2003 to counter critics who claimed the administration had exaggerated the nuclear threat posed by Saddam Hussein.


"I wanted people to see the truth and thought it made sense for people to see the truth," Bush said during an appearance at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.

"You're not supposed to talk about classified information, and so I declassified the document," he said in a question-and-answer session after delivering a speech on Iraq. "I thought it was important for people to get a better sense for why I was saying what I was saying in my speeches. And I felt I could do so without jeopardizing ongoing intelligence matters, and so I did."

It was Bush's first comment since more detail about the release of a prewar intelligence document surfaced last week in a court filing by U.S. prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald.

In the filing, Fitzgerald wrote that Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, told a grand jury that Bush authorized him, through Cheney, to leak information from a classified document that detailed intelligence agencies' conclusions about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Schumer, D-N.Y., sent a letter to Jr. asking for details.

...A lawyer knowledgeable about the case said Saturday that Bush declassified sensitive intelligence in 2003 and authorized it to be publicly disclosed to rebut Iraq war critics. But the lawyer said Bush did not specifically direct Libby to disseminate information about prewar intelligence to reporters.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent a letter to Bush on Monday asking him for details about how the document was declassified. "There are many questions that the president must answer so that the American people can understand that this declassification was done for national security purposes, not for immediate political gain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. he declassified to have more ammo to "catapult the propaganda";
in this case to disseminate to the public the same self-fulfilling, result-oriented bullshit information and judgments that Cheney was browbeating out of the Pentagon and CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC