Libby Defends Releasing Fitzgerald Letter

sabra

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:41 PM
Original message

Libby Defends Releasing Fitzgerald Letter

http://www.localnewsleader.com/elytimes/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=179703

Libby Defends Releasing Fitzgerald Letter

WASHINGTON - Lawyers for Vice President Dick Cheney ‘s indicted former chief of staff on Friday defended their decision to release a letter to the news media before it was filed in federal court, and they urged the judge in the CIA leak case not to react by issuing a gag order.

Libby‘s lawyers rushed out the letter to the news media because it was advantageous to their client. In it, Fitzgerald acknowledged making a mistake in one of his earlier court filings.

Libby‘s legal team expressed concern that such restrictions "would embroil the court and the parties in First Amendment litigation with news organizations that would distract us from the important issues" in the case.

Despite angering the judge with the letter‘s release, Libby‘s legal team called the disclosure "appropriate." The Libby team sent the letter to reporters the night of April 11. The letter appeared on the court docket the next afternoon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mike_c

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message

1. this demonstrates that the Libby defense is willfully attempting...

...to conduct a trial by press release and influence the court by influencing public opinion. That justifies a gag order, IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Robb

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. Bingo. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

coffeenap

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1

4. Maybe they want a gag order and as many other "issues" as poss. nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rzemanfl

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1

5. A gag order is exactly what they want! It would keep everything

quiet until after the November elections. Libby is still a Bushco tool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

H2O Man

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. No it wouldn't.

Their court filings would still be public, except a few that are sealed. It would only stop Team Libby from trying to spin things on the sly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rzemanfl

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6

13. I was expecting the press to be included in the gag order, which

can be done in "exceptional circumstances" in a criminal case one that applied only to the parties would be okay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

WhiteTara

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1

10. oh, and it's going to backfire

he can try, but he is going to go down. Grand juries aren't stupid people. To be there, they become dedicated because why waste their time on something trivial. Burn Libby Burn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

napi21

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message

2. Now, now guys, you know you shouldn't pi** off the judge, don't ya?

If you didn't know that, I'm thinkin you're about to be educated!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

truthisfreedom

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message

7. *yawn*

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Orangepeel

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message

8. obvious statement of the year

"Libby‘s lawyers rushed out the letter to the news media because it was advantageous to their client."

Well, duh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Peace Patriot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message

9. What was the mistake that Fizgerald acknowledged in his earlier filings?

It sounds rather routine. Lawyers make filing mistakes, and do typos, and forget to put on cover sheets, and this and that, all the time. Then they file corrections. It's no big deal. Then they are somewhat at the mercy of the judge, is all--and the judge certainly doesn't want to issue rulings on uncorrected docs or faulty secretarial-type, or even faulty legal-type, information--ESPECIALLY with an accused's freedom at risk. Courts usually have some flexibility in this regard. And I doubt--extremely--that Fitzgerald is the type to abuse such flexibility.

But the substance of the mistake might tell us something about Mr. Fall Guy's intentions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kagemusha

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. About the exact category stuff from the NIE that Libby leaked was

Like, stuff being part of the body of the text as opposed to the summary of claims. The summary of claims was declassified at the urging of Hadley later, IIRC. This would make what Libby leaked sound more benign.

I could be wrong but, that's the minutiae the mistake concerned.

Note that it's not probable Fitzgerald has the entire NIE. When you don't have the source document, it's easy to make mistakes about representations people have made to you in testimony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Media_Lies_Daily

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Apr-21-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #11

12. I doubt seriously that Fitz doesn't have the entire NIE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 01st 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.