Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Puts Off Military Tribunal Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:37 PM
Original message
Judge Puts Off Military Tribunal Hearing
Judge Puts Off Military Tribunal Hearing
By TONI LOCY, Associated Press Writer

Friday, May 12, 2006

(05-12) 15:16 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

A federal judge on Friday postponed a pretrial military hearing in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for a Saudi accused of being part of an al-Qaida bomb-making cell.
(snip)

The high court's term ends in late June or early July, when justices are expected to rule in the case of another Guantanamo Bay detainee, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, who is challenging President Bush's power to create a separate system of justice for terrorism suspects.

Administration lawyers had argued Sullivan lacked authority to stop al-Sharbi's May 15 hearing because of a controversial law Congress passed late last year that proponents say requires the dismissal of hundreds of civil lawsuits filed on behalf of Guantanamo detainees.

"The government also claims that this brief delay would imperil the war effort," Sullivan wrote. "The government has not explained, however, why the court must adhere to the laws of war now, rather than wait a few weeks so that it may follow the rule of law, as it will be determined by the Supreme Court."
(snip/...)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/05/12/national/w151655D44.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. Signs of life in even the most carefully hand picked judges
This is the case with the habeus issues that the 5 in SCOTUS got so excercised about a month or two ago. They did not seem to view the state's case too positively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC