Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran Proposal to U.S. Offered Peace with Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:20 PM
Original message
Iran Proposal to U.S. Offered Peace with Israel
I'm not familiar with Inter Press Service (IPS), which is an international news service, but Professor Juan Cole links to it.

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33350

WASHINGTON, May 24 (IPS) - Iran offered in 2003 to accept peace with Israel and cut off material assistance to Palestinian armed groups and to pressure them to halt terrorist attacks within Israel's 1967 borders, according to the secret Iranian proposal to the United States.

The two-page proposal for a broad Iran-U.S. agreement covering all the issues separating the two countries, a copy of which was obtained by IPS, was conveyed to the United States in late April or early May 2003. Trita Parsi, a specialist on Iranian foreign policy at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies who provided the document to IPS, says he got it from an Iranian official earlier this year but is not at liberty to reveal the source.

The two-page document contradicts the official line of the George W. Bush administration that Iran is committed to the destruction of Israel and the sponsorship of terrorism in the region.

Parsi says the document is a summary of an even more detailed Iranian negotiating proposal which he learned about in 2003 from the U.S. intermediary who carried it to the State Department on behalf of the Swiss Embassy in late April or early May 2003. The intermediary has not yet agreed to be identified, according to Parsi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why have a diplomatic approach when a military one is available?
That is bush thinking. AIPAC certainly does not care about a diplomatic solution either.


http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0412-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is there any doubt that Bushco wants
to go ahead with the plan to control the Mideast through invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. There i$ no doubt the AWOL chimpanzee want$ to wa$te more...
... lower income blood (not hi$ own, or hi$ "have more" ba$e's own) to rob another sovereign country's natural resource (BigOil'$).

Who's gonna throw the$e Enron-style mob$ter$ in jail? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Bingo! Gotta keep feeding that military-industrial complex beast w/60% of
Edited on Fri May-26-06 03:11 PM by Roland99
our fiscal budget.

How else will the FUCKWADS FROM HELL make any money? I mean, they've struck special deals with God and Jesus, themselves, to be able to take all of their material possessions and money with them when they die.

Why do you think they want the Estate Tax eliminated? Then they can take even MORE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. The entire narrative is the same from the run up to Iraq to now
Edited on Fri May-26-06 03:42 PM by izzybeans
even the attempts by the threatened country to try to negotiate and on the terms that apparently everybody wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. '...but naturally we're not listening' (south park movie reference)
NOTHING is going to get in the way of BushCo.'s WAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting
If this indeed is true, it proves that even under different Iranian leadership, the administration would not be behaving too differently. Ahmedenijad isn't completely stable, but it's clear he's being used as an excuse to not working toward better relations.

This administration really has no intention of peace. And they have been beating the war drums.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can't have that! Think what it would do to our 'war toy economy'.
We MUST keep people fighting or we can't sell our arms. It's all we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush won't take peace for an answer
Just like Poppy. He must have his war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. After reading some other news on their site
a second source or a release of the document would improve my trust in this account.

This is an advocacy site. Not that advocacy means news in wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC