Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Safavian denies collusion with Abramoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:31 AM
Original message
Safavian denies collusion with Abramoff
"WASHINGTON - Former Bush administration official David Safavian testified Monday that he wouldn't have taken a golfing trip to Scotland arranged in 2002 by Republican influence peddler Jack Abramoff "if I had known what I know now."


Testifying in his own defense in U.S. District Court, Safavian added, however, that "it took a Senate investigation to get out the information I didn't have at the time" about Abramoff's intentions and plans for projects with GSA properties.

Safavian, the former chief of staff at the General Services Administration and chief federal procurement officer in the White House, had said earlier that he decided to testify in his own defense because he was tired of "taking grenades" for 10 months and wanted "to explain my side.""

<snip>

"Safavian did express regret over two e-mails he sent Abramoff about GSA's plan to redevelop the Old Post Office in Washington, a project Abramoff hoped to help an Indian tribe client obtain.

"It was not a brilliant move" to forward and internal government e-mail describing another official's opposition to GSA's plan, and it was probably inappropriate to send another e-mail to Abramoff saying "we're gonna have to roll this idiot," Safavian testified. He blamed those errors on his inexperience in the executive branch."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060605/ap_on_go_ot/lobbyist_probe_2



I guess that if you don't know you are breaking the law, it's ok to break the law. It's hard to believe this guy got so far up the ladder by being so ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. "we're gonna have to roll this idiot" - well, then the question becomes
Who is "we"?

We = Safavian and Abramoff?

What a moran!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. "If I had known what I know now"
i.e. you would be under indictment. Gee that's a nice admission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. being involved with the good ol'boy network wasn't a clue?
its how he got up the ladder ... he knew it then; and, it knows it now ... success in a good ol'boy has a lot to do with its 'values', i.e., corruption, being a tool, selling one's soul, being a media creation (like DimSon), etc. ... collusion happened by 'joining' for the observed benefits and by doing its bidding (for acceptance and promotion) ... brown-nosing is one-way 'in' ... identifying with the network's 'culture' (fitting its mold)... collusion helps a good ol'boy network contains its power; control its minions; and, maintain its self-preservation ... the network lines each other's pockets while abusing the system along the way ...

those in a good ol'boy network knows it, Safavian knows it; and, anyone who has ever experienced a good ol'boy network knows it ... it's how a good ol'boy network operate ...

now, he's saying "if I had known what I know now"?

he's lying



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC