Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Iraq Decides It Still Needs U.S.-Led Military Presence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 09:45 PM
Original message
NYT: Iraq Decides It Still Needs U.S.-Led Military Presence
The new government of Iraq has decided to postpone any demand for negotiations to establish a more formal legal basis for the presence of American and other foreign troops on its soil, Iraqi and American officials said this week.

Instead, these officials said, Iraq will allow the current United Nations mandate to remain in effect beyond a deadline next Thursday for a review of Security Council Resolution 1637, which provides legal authority for the American-led military coalition to continue its combat operations.

"I've just finished speaking with my foreign minister, who intends to be in New York for the review, and it will not be a point at which we terminate," Samir al-Sumaidaie, Iraq's new ambassador to the United States, said Friday. The new government led by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki is the first full-term government to take power in Iraq since the American invasion more than three years ago.

Iraq has the right to unilaterally end the United Nations troops mandate at any time, as spelled out in the resolution approved unanimously by the Security Council last Nov. 8.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/world/middleeast/11troops.ready.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where is the press release from Iraqi government about this?
How come it is the NY Times saying this shit for obvious domestic consumption in the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, I'm sure the fact that they'd be toast the second the withdrew
is a consideration. That and the money that we continuously funnel into that country, right after we take it away from the things we need in this country.

I am not of the mindset that I don't believe that we don't owe the Iraqi people bigtime. We destroyed their country, we do owe them. But fixing what we broke just ain't happening. The money doesn't go to benefit the real victims of our invasion. Unless you can count reparations money that we pay for killing innocent civilians, which I DON'T. That's incredible, mind boggling. "Sorry we killed Grandma and your two sons, here's $7,500.00 to cover your loss." Now that is just obscene. And their 'government' hasn't said a word. And THAT'S why they need us there like I said. They'd be toast.

Jeez, I'm rambling. I just watched Lewis Black. He has that effect on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee. Who could have predicted this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSun Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Permanent bases
Since congress just approved permanent bases in Iraq, I don't think it's up to the Iraqis anyway. The decider has decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Iraq has the right
to unilaterally end the United Nations troops mandate at any time, as spelled out in the resolution approved unanimously by the Security Council last Nov. 8." :rofl:


Oh. You mean it's not a joke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. No surprise - the "Iraqi government" wouldn't last five days
Without U.S. troops and the fortifications of the Green Zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC