Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey Demands Data on Phone Call Surveillance and Is SUED by U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:12 PM
Original message
New Jersey Demands Data on Phone Call Surveillance and Is SUED by U.S.
From The New York Times via the incomparable Cryptome:

TRENTON, June 15 — The New Jersey attorney general has issued subpoenas to five telephone companies to determine whether any of them violated the state's consumer protection laws by providing records to the National Security Agency. Experts say it is the first legal move by a state to question the agency's program to compile calling records to track terrorist activities.

On Wednesday, the United States filed a lawsuit to block the subpoenas, setting up a legal showdown pitting the state's authority to protect consumers' rights against the federal government's national security powers.

"People in New Jersey and people everywhere have privacy rights," the state's attorney general, Zulima V. Farber, said on Thursday. "What we were trying to determine was whether the phone companies in New Jersey had violated any law or any contractual obligations with their consumers by supplying information to some government entity, simply by request, and not by any court order or search warrant."

This latest confrontation over the invocation of national security began last month, when Ms. Farber issued the subpoenas to the companies — AT&T, Verizon, Qwest, Sprint Nextel and Cingular Wireless — to determine whether they had turned over the phone records to the federal government without a court order, in possible violation of state laws.

But when the Justice Department filed suit in United States District Court here to block those subpoenas — a suit that Ms. Farber received on Thursday — it asserted that the state was straying into a federal matter, and that compliance with the subpoenas would imperil national security.

--snip--


PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. not sued by the us. sued by a cabal that took over the federal govt in
a multi year, multi front, well planned coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is proof phone co's are lying
If it is true as they say that these co's (they have all denied it) gave gov't nothing then why block it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought these were the "state's rights" guys?
Who want to drown the federal government in a bathtub?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 'States Rights' was just for public consumption
As we have seen, the Administration's public stance often has little to do with their true agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is appalling
i guess their support for 'states rights' extends only so far, for things like the confederate flag and anti-gay legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shameless kick, this is important. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. national security is protecting bushco from the slammer
these people are despots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. K and R, K and R
K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC