Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General: We're in for long war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:12 AM
Original message
General: We're in for long war

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060630/NEWS01/306300021

General: We're in for long war

Americans can expect to see large-scale troop reductions in both Iraq and Afghanistan over the next few years as the U.S. military shifts to a new phase of the “long war’’ against radical Islamic terrorists, a top official of the U.S. Central Command said in Cincinnati Friday.

“I’m not suggesting that the numbers should go from 200,000 to zero, but I am saying that, within a few years, the numbers will be a fraction of what they are today,’’ said Army Brig. Gen. Mark T. Kimmitt, the deputy director of strategy and plans at Central Command in Iraq.

Kimmitt, who spoke at a private breakfast sponsored by the Jewish Federation at the Bankers Club downtown, said the top priority for the U.S. Central is winning what Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld dubbed the “long war.’’

...

“The goal is not winning Iraq, although that’s right up there; and it is not winning Afghanistan, although that is right up there too,’’ Kimmitt said. “The goal is winning the larger battle.’’


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. And the larger battle is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. the so-called 'war' against the abstract notion of 'terror'
which is, by definition, unwinnable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Got it. Monty Python Act II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. A steady stream of defense appropriations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. The General KNOWS Iran is next and that will take a lot of troops
Edited on Fri Jun-30-06 11:16 AM by wakeme2008
:grr:

I is getting very drafty in here :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Ah YES KILLER KIMMITT again rises to the surface of the water
Like a bloated turd in a warm toilet bowl this fool and apologist for War Crimes again is being quoted as an expert and a source

He belongs in the Hague for what he has done

It was he, who helped decide, to do a Lidice on Fallujah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. within a few years, the numbers will be a fraction of what they are today
Hell, 95% is a fraction, right?

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. three halfs is also a fraction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. 2+2=5
We have always been at war with Eurasia, or is it Eastasia.......

I forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. So we lose the little battles...
in order to win the larger battle???

Okay. That's a good military strategy. Let's go with that one.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. We won the war but lost the battle,
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. "The goal is not winning" - you can say that again!
Oh, he did say it again:

“The goal is not winning Iraq, although that’s right up there; and it is not winning Afghanistan, although that is right up there too,’’ Kimmitt said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The goal is to kill as many brown people
and get our troops as much on the job training as we can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Right. Exactly what IS the goal?
Might one of these idiots actually set measurable benchmarks by which the effort can be measured? (rhetorical. We all know the answer.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. Yep. What was the first 'goal' again? Then the 'next' ...
... and the next ... and on ... and on ...

There's been so many 'goals' it's hard to keep up with what their 'current' lie (uh, sorry: 'goal') is...

Let's recap for a moment.

Some 75 years ago: 'They' just hated that 'New Deal' stuff and their 'goal' was to destroy it. Then, 'their' next 'goal' was to make a deal with Germany. When that failed, 'their' next 'goal' was to become like Germany in order for the haves and havemores to dominate the world and get as much free oil as 'they' could get their filthy hands on, no matter how many millions would have to be 'sacrificed' in their criminal take over...

On, and on, to the WMD lies (PNAC), then the 'spreading democracy' lies, then ... 'their' stay-the-course to this total anihilation and destruction of all living species in this big environmental catastrophe we're all in (Depleted-Uranium + White Phosphorous + Excessive CO2 + 'you-name-it-they-do-it'), including the so called 'Human race' is their ultimate 'goal' because they'd never live with the billions they already have: for 'them' there's never enough billions (or trillions, as of this day).

Never enough is their mantra. Hence the never ending 'chain-of-goals' (lies).

Who would be brave enough to 'ask' them what their 'goal' is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. The goal is to keep Americans in fear and Halliburton in $$
duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I bet the main goal is building those secret permanent bases
I think that is what the delay is all about. That is why BushCo wants that "open end" timetable. Follow the money.

that is the only explanation as to why the whole republican senate, except for Chaffee, were shreaking in unision not to pull out. Logic tells you, that whenever an entire group, that large, agrees - it's unnatural and something is rotten in Denmark...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, and as soon as the troop levels become . .
. . low enough that Iraq is no longer the perfect recruiting and training ground for terrorists, then the terrorosts will find other ways to attack us.

Perhaps, then we'll see a resumption of WTC-like attacks on American soil - or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Any Al Qaida in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. yup,
hiding in the marble bathtub :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I believe Grand Fenwick has the Q-bomb
which they stole from us during an air raid alert.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Mission is Occupation...
and since there is no real goals other than pacification of a hostile population, the vast majority of which had little or nothing to do with the 'war on terror' -- then the soldiers will simply succumb to brigandy, terror and revenge similar to the IDF in occupied Palestine. The permanent occupation of the Middle East will be a constant 'deal breaker' as the various lobbies form to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. In other news, water has been found to be wet.
More at 11. Karen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. “The goal is not winning Iraq"?
But isn't that what Bush keeps telling the country, that we are going to be there until the mission is finish? What would have happened if Clinton had ordered to go to war in another country but told them that their goal was not winning? The Freepers would have crucified him!

I think none of our generals have a clue as to what to do about Iraq and Afghanistan. Too much praying to Jesus, and not enough doses of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_MUST_Go Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The goal is NOT to find Osama either. The goal is making money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. now that thousands of terrorists have been effectively trained in Iraq,
expect to see them here soon, on US soil, with smuggled explosives stolen from unguarded bunkers at the beginning of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Perpetual War versus the Good Fight
Today is the 1,198th day of the Iraq War, or three years, three months, and ten days, and we're being told it will take much longer.

If this were the 1,198th day of America's formal involvement in World War Two, today's date would be about March 19th, 1945.

By the 1,198th day of America's part in World War II, virtually all of Western Europe had been wrested from German occupation. El Alamein, Midway, Stalingrad, Normandy, the Destruction of Army Group Centre, the Battle of the Bulge, and most of the other epic battles besides Okinawa were in the history books. France was fielding an entire army of its own again. George S. Patton was http://www.scrapbookpages.com/EasternGermany/Buchenwald/GeneralPatton.html">pissing into the Rhine, and the U.S. Ninth Army was crossing it at Remagen into Germany itself.

On March 19th, 1945, Germany was about five weeks away from surrendering unconditionally. The Japanese empire in the Pacific had been completely retaken or neutralized and one of its own provinces, Iwo Jima, was a week away from finally falling to U.S. Marines. The atomic bomb was only four months away from completion, and the entire war was less than six months away from ending.

That was a fucking war. This is a corporate enterprise, and it will continue until it becomes unprofitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. If this were the Civil War (U.S.) the big set piece battles
like Antietam and Gettysburg would be memories and Grant and the Army of the Potomac would be fighting toward Richmond "if it takes all summer." Vicksburg would have long since fallen and the Mississippi would long since have been flowing unvexed to the sea. And that was a war too and not a corporate enterprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Thanks for the 'timely' reminder, Sofa_King.
This neocon corporate enterprise needs to be stopped because IMHO if they get their way, the war will never end.
They will just take it on the road someplace else.
This thought was inspired by an episode of M*A*S*H I saw a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. The goal is to scoop as much money as possible out of the US treasury
into the pockets of the wealthy corporate warmongers. You know, bidness as usual. Create the bogeymen...communists, terrorists, drug runners, doesn't matter, it's all the same...get your money-making war on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. Viet Nam Act II n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. The incredible morphing war
I thought this was about Saddam endangering America with WMD. Them I thought it was bringing democracy to the mideast. Now it's a "long war" against radical Islam?

It ain't what these guys said going in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. Do we want non-stop "War"?
If yes, then keep voting Republicans in.....they will make sure that the military is constantly being engaged in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
31. no, the goal is to
burn the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, bankrupt our country and create even more boogey men!!! The goal is to bring the US to it's knees so that the corporate greedheads can have their NWO--where democracies (the will of the people) are crushed under corporate domination. Fascism anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
32. Why does Rumsfeld call it --- "The LONG War"?
Sounds like he alone is deciding US policy for continual war. Does he represent the majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. .99 is a fraction, so is 2.25
In fact, any proportion can be expressed as a fraction.

"I am saying that, within a few years, the numbers will be a fraction of what they are today,’’ said Army Brig. Gen. Mark T. Kimmitt"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC