Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV - A Secure and Verifiable Voting System

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 10:46 AM
Original message
BBV - A Secure and Verifiable Voting System
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/25/213206&mode=thread&tid=103&tid=126&tid=172&tid=99

"The cryptographer David Chaum, through discussion with top cryptographers such as Ron Rivest, has designed a secure and verifiable voting system. One of the goals of his design is that anyone can verify that votes were tabulated correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not bad, but I think mine is better,
because it is simpler.

You cast your vote on a machine similar to the current ones. It spits out a barcode with your votes encoded on it.

You take the card to a second machine, which is a barcode reader. It shows your vote on the screen. If it’s wrong, you tell it to shred it, and go vote again. If it’s OK, it spits the card back out, and you deposit it in the ballot box as a record to be used for recounts. The official electronic version of the vote is stored in the barcode reader, not the machine you enter your choices on.

This should eliminate random machine errors. They would be noticed.

As far as deliberate vote flipping: Both machines would have to be programmed to flip certain votes. This adds to the complexity of an attempt to manipulate the votes, reducing the chances of it happening. Flipping every vote would be very obvious, so only flipping certain votes would be the area that needs to be detected. The barcode itself would have to tell the second machine that “this vote is to be flipped”. So the first machine would have to flip the vote, show the intended vote on the screen, and print an instruction in the barcode that this is a flipped vote. (Who’s gonna try to get away with a printed permanent record of trying to flip votes?) Then, the second machine has to read the flipping instruction, and be capable of showing the intended vote again, despite a different vote being encoded for counting. So the intended vote MUST be shown in the barcode somewhere. Complicated and risky.

And finally, with a convenient, coded card available for recounts, they can be done quickly and easily. Therefore, we can facilitate mandatory random recounts of the cards without stress to the system. This can be done on yet another machine, which could be a very simple barcode reader only. The software for this should be open source, and probably substantially exists. Even if the flipping is occurring in the central compiling computer, these random, localized, recounts should show any problems, and will go a long way towards prevention just by being there.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That just moves the onus on the barcode reader machine
to be free from bugs and portray on the screen what it's actually recording in the database.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC