NYT: Laws Involving Contact With Minors Allow Prosecutors a Broad Range of Discretion
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: October 2, 2006
The decision by Representative Mark Foley of Florida to resign after the disclosure of his sexually explicit e-mail and text messaging exchanges with a teenage boy has been followed by a flood of demands from his former Congressional colleagues — Republicans and Democrats alike — that he face “the full weight of the criminal justice system.”
Legal experts consulted yesterday said that weight could be considerable.
Though the messages made public to date stopped short of soliciting sex or proposing an assignation, some were quite graphic and invited the 16-year-old, a former Congressional page, to describe intimate actions....Marjorie Heins, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice and the founder of the Free Expression Policy Project, said that prosecutors almost certainly had the legal tools to pursue Mr. Foley....
***
But legal experts cautioned that any case against Mr. Foley would involve difficult jurisdictional and constitutional questions. At least four jurisdictions may be implicated: Washington and Florida, where Mr. Foley worked; Louisiana, the page’s home; the federal system; and perhaps others, as information about contacts with other pages emerges....
***
A Florida law makes it a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison, to transmit “material harmful to minors by electronic device.” The law defines the material broadly to include descriptions of “nudity, sexual conduct, or sexual excitement.”...And Mr. Foley is not the only person who could possibly face prosecution, Professor Berman said. “IF THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO KNEW ABOUT HIM OR PROTECTED HIM,” he said, “SOME SORT OF COMPLICITY OR CONSPIRACY CHARGE IS CERTAINLY VIABLE.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/02/washington/02legal.html