Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UN despair at prospect of 'faceless' Ban Ki-Moon as secretary general

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 11:03 AM
Original message
UN despair at prospect of 'faceless' Ban Ki-Moon as secretary general
Senior officials at the United Nations expressed despair today at the prospect of Kofi Annan being succeeded as secretary general by Ban Ki-Moon, the South Korean foreign minister.
...
Although Mr Ban was supported by Britain and France in the straw poll, they did so reluctantly, according to one UN insider. In private, both countries wanted the selection process to run for another month or so in the hope that a more impressive candidate might come forward. In the end, they concluded it was not feasible to hold out against the enthusiastic backing of the US, China and Russia.
...
UN officials are convinced that the Bush administration, ideologically hostile to the UN and still smarting from Mr Annan's opposition to the Iraq war, wanted the weakest candidate possible.

But Yasuhiko Yoshida, a Korea specialist at Saitama University in Japan, does not see weakness as necessarily a drawback: "Ban lacks the toughness needed to reform the UN. But that is why he has been chosen ... A weak man is an appropriate choice. The best role that Ban can play is not a leader, but a good coordinator and harmoniser of views."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,,1889535,00.html


It looks like they wanted a candidate easy to push around, which either means deadlock, and no change in the UN (which enables Bush and Bolton to paint it as 'ineffectual'), or change as the permanent Security Council members want. This doesn't look good for adding new permanent members, or reforming the veto. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chefgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please tell me no, but....
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 11:30 AM by chefgirl
Any relation to the 'Moonies' ??? I cant find anything about it on Google.

-chef-

edited: forgive my ignorance, is Ban his last name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, I think 'Ban' is his family name
The article certainly refers to him as "Mr. Ban", and that matches with other Koreans such as Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il.

It can get confusing, sometimes - a Chinese friend of mine puts his family name last in English, just to get it used correctly by the English speakers who are unsure. I've known others who adopt an Anglo-Saxon name to use in English, with their family name, in the European order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bolton may be gone in January, but he's done his damage.
A weak and pliable Secretary General makes its so much easier
to keep the U.N. as a tool of the major powers. Mr. Ban
shows promise as a quiet beureucrat who won't get big ideas
about the U.N. changing the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC