Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A.P.: U.S. Army making plans to keep current Iraq troop level through 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:16 AM
Original message
A.P.: U.S. Army making plans to keep current Iraq troop level through 2010
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 10:41 AM by sabra

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

A.P.: U.S. Army making plans to keep current Iraq troop level through 2010.



more:


http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/10/11/ap3083305.html

Army: Troops to Stay in Iraq Until 2010


The U.S. Army has plans that would keep the current level of troops in Iraq - about 15 brigades - through 2010, the top Army officer said Wednesday.

The Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, cautioned that people not read too much into the planning, because it is easier to pull back forces than to get units prepared and deployed at the last minute.

"This is not a prediction that things are going poorly or better," Schoomaker told reporters. "It's just that I have to have enough ammo in the magazine that I can continue to shoot as long as they want us to shoot."

His comments come less than four weeks before congressional elections, in which the unpopular war in Iraq and the Bush administration's policies there are a major campaign issue.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Gore administration may revise their plans n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. now that sounds good!
:thumbsup:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. What makes you think the Decider plans on giving up the White House?
Martial Law is only another 9/11 away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Army thugs love War
Maybe the Resistance will change their plans

(NO PHOTO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Most Banana Republics are run by the mililary and the US is no
exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. oNE ONLY HAS TO LOOK AT CENTRAL AMERICA FROM 1900 ONWARD
The US and the marines have kept dozens of thugish uniformed military dictators in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, that's up to the next president
Unless of course the military has forgotten about civilian control of the armed forces, or the Bush crowd is planning on being in power forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. What will voters have to say about an admission like this?
Are there enough war lovers left to keep the gop in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. But Dubya said that we'd start bringing troops home this year
Published: Monday May 22, 2006

LONDON -- Tony Blair and George Bush will announce that they are to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq at a summit in Washington as early as this week, RAW STORY has learned.

The process has already been carefully choreographed in an attempt to bolster the popularity of both Bush and Blair who have suffered domestically for their handling of the war.

The scope of the phased withdrawal, which will see the 133,000 US force levels cut to around 100,000 by the end of the year and British numbers almost halved, has already been agreed, one senior defence source said.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Report_Bush_Blair_to_announce_phased_0522.html

So when will McCain blame this on Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't people in the Nixon admin think they'd stay in Vietnam?
And they were proven wrong.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. I remember when it was going to be down to 30 thousand troops
by the fall of 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I recall something about a cakewalk too.
That's a pretty long cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. "No war plans on my desk."
"They'll greet us with open arms."

"It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."

--

>>Appearing with Casey, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said he and other senior Pentagon officials are still studying how the military might keep up the current pace of Iraq deployments without overtaxing the Army and Marine Corps, which have borne the brunt of the conflict. Rumsfeld said one option is to make more use of the Air Force and Navy for work that normally is done by soldiers and Marines.
>snip<

At his news conference, Rumsfeld was asked whether he bears responsibility for what has gone wrong in Iraq or if the military commanders there are to blame.

"Of course I bear responsibility," he replied in apparent exasperation. "My Lord, I'm secretary of defense. Write it down."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=HOME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yet one more reason to vote against the Republicans. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. Email from Family in Iraq
His date has been extended for 6 months. He was coming home in Dec. . It looks like stop loss will go into effect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ummm...so what if the Iraqi government the one that was
voted in with the purple fingers....

What if they say to America get the hell out...? It is obvious to the world that America is an occupier.....

And what troops are they going to use....our men and women in the military are tired and broken.....we have to get them home.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. My prediction for the Press Release in 2010:
"A.P.: U.S. Army making plans to keep current Iraq troop level through 2020."

QUAGMIRE!!!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. am I reading too much into this?
This announcement ain't gonna help the Pukes at all come November.

Maybe the military wants a way out (of Iraq) sooner rather than later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. ``````the Army will need $138.8 billion in 2008,
Schoomaker spoke as the U.S. military death toll in Iraq rose to at least 2,750 since the war's start in March 2003. On Wednesday, the U.S. command said three U.S. Marines and two soldiers were killed in fighting there.

In another indication of the burden the Army expects to bear, Schoomaker said he believes the Army will need $138.8 billion in 2008, nearly $40 billion more than its planned expenditures for the 2007 budget year, which began Oct. 1. Schoomaker's proposed figure is nearly $25 billion more than the initial amount discussed by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

Schoomaker said the Army needs the money to modernize the force, continue needed research and development programs, and keep enough combat brigades in the field, while allowing adequate time for training and restoring equipment between deployments.

The Bush administration is likely to release its 2008 budget in February.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Iraqi Resistance plans 10th Anniversary Tet Offensive for 2010- n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Army plans current Iraq troop levels until 2010
Top officer says future planning 'is not a prediction' of how war is going

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Army has plans to keep the current level of soldiers in Iraq through 2010, the top Army officer said Wednesday, a later date than Bush administration or Pentagon officials have mentioned thus far.

<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15220816/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Take back Congress, cut off funding
and pitch that plan in the trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. So that's another 4 years and so another $500 billion for Iraq occupation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. More years if we don't win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. By "dont win" do you mean "take effective measures to prevent theft"?
sorry, had to, it's general not personal, my soapbox is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. still about 1/2 million troops short of numbers needed to stabilise Iraq
Stay the Course(TM) seems to be a dead end, not enough political will to institute a draft.

So the troops will stay - undermanned and under attack for the next 3 years. How many dead GIs and Iraqis there will be by that time is anyones guess. Even with mortality rates at current levels we are talking 5-6000 US dead and at least a million Iraqi fatalities in total.

:cry: F.U.W. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC