Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roles of gay staffers raise suspicions in Foley scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:23 AM
Original message
Roles of gay staffers raise suspicions in Foley scandal
October 22, 2006

WASHINGTON — One of the inescapable facts of the scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley is that three key people who had some of the earliest clues about the congressman’s advances toward teenage boys are, like Foley, gay.

Jim Kolbe, a Republican congressman from Arizona, received a complaint from a former page in 2001 or 2002 that Foley had sent the boy e-mails that made him uncomfortable. Jeff Trandahl, the House clerk in charge of the page program, was so concerned about Foley’s behavior several years ago that he reported it to Kirk Fordham, Foley’s chief of staff.

Kolbe, Trandahl and Fordham are openly gay.

The question of who knew what, and when, has roiled the uneasy peace between the Republican Party and its cadre of gay staffers, who don’t welcome the spotlight. It also has raised the question: Were Kolbe, Fordham and Trandahl trying to downplay the Foley issue to protect a fellow gay Republican?

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/10/22/Worldandnation/Roles_of_gay_staffers.shtml

Were Kolbe, Fordham and Trandahl trying to downplay the Foley issue to protect a fellow gay Republican? No! They were trying to downplay the Foley issue to protect a fellow Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. the purpose of this article is to say that The Gays
were more guilty of the same things that there hetero counterparts were.

The Gays are evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. And tubbo the clown (aka speaker of the house)
did nothing because???

They ought to tackle that question.

Once again...it's the republikkaner-enabling press with their

"What did the subordinates know?" not what people with real power knew and did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Plus, the ones that actually did try to do something
are the ones at fault in this story.

This article uses the same twisted logic that people use who blame a woman for letting a man rape her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well . . . there goes breakfast. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. LOL. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. blaming the victim...a common theme.
It happens on both sides. One tries to "rationalize away" why the problem happened, only to appear to be blaming the ones who suffered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton was Gay.!!!! yea.! that's the ticket..!!
Edited on Mon Oct-23-06 04:57 AM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe some of the pages felt safer telling an openly gay person
about the whole thing? Perhaps they originally didn't want a big deal made, but just wanted Foley to stop sending them the messages? It would make sense that a kid who just wanted it to stop would approach someone who he thought could talk to Foley and get him to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. You can submit a comment at the link. Mine:
"It seems to me that the three staffers mentioned in this article were the only ones who tried to protect the minor page from being preyed upon.

Maybe we need more gay staffers in Washington."

What f#ckheads these people are. Does FL have ANY newspapers that aren't fish wrap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, the alt weekly, the New Times. Their reporter wrote about Foley in 03
When I lived in Miami, I loved the Miami New Times. Always good investigative pieces. http://www.newtimesbpb.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. GAY PEOPLE AREN'T PEDOPHILES!!
For God's sake, what the hell is wrong with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. so many logical errors i don't know where to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. wow, still in the news? how many days is this... 15?
remarkable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. The real message that this tries to smokescreen...
Is that Republicans are a racketeering influenced organization.
Specifically, they are a Pedophile ring masquerading as a government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC