Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Asthma rates high near pollution (worst offender: engine exhaust)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 01:16 PM
Original message
Study: Asthma rates high near pollution (worst offender: engine exhaust)
A new study of asthma in children suggests that fumes from traffic -- especially diesel-burning truck traffic -- is making kids sick:

With the South Bronx home to miles of expressways and truck traffic from some of the busiest wholesale produce, meat and fish markets in the world, students there are twice as likely to attend a school near a highway as were children in other parts of New York City.

In 18 of the 69 days examined in the three-year period in the South Bronx study, average daily exposure to fine-particle pollution for a group of 10 children exceeded the EPA's standards, which will be set to 35 micrograms per cubic meter in December.

(...)

Thurston said the findings of the study, which will be published in a scientific journal next year, showed that only 5 percent to 10 percent of the fine particle pollution was soot from diesel exhaust, but it was that portion that seemed to be having the worst effect on the children's asthma. He said their symptoms, such as wheezing, doubled on days when pollution from truck traffic was highest.

From 2002 to 2005, 10 children from each of four schools in the South Bronx took part in the study. They were given backpacks equipped with a battery-powered pump and air filter, along with other air quality monitoring instruments.


More at http://www.registerguard.com/news/2006/10/29/a3.nat.asthmaexp.1029.p1.php?section=nation_world


Bottom line: this study found that the most potent asthmagenic substance among all the particulates is diesel exhaust, even though diesel exhaust accounts for only a small fraction of the particulate pollution that the kids were exposed to.

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. But,but,but
that takes away the smoking claims, damn it. It just can't be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is The New Low-Sulfur Diesel Any Better?
Europe switched to low-sulfur diesel several years ago.
The US is just switching now. Maybe that will help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The new low sulfur diesel fuel...
which the trucking industry has been fighting tooth and nail for years, is much better in terms of particulate exhaust. Biodiesel is an order of magnitude better still. Funny how the government put the interests of the trucking industry first....

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've had to shake my head and laugh to keep from crying because
in recent years the popular claim has been that asthma rates are up because our houses are too clean and our kids are protected from childhood diseases by vaccines. Supposedly this creates a naive immune system that overreacts to everything. Set aside that I have a family of asthmatics raised in a 120 year old house with cats and dogs (let's just say my housekeeping does not create a 100% sterile environment) if you pursue this logic we should let all our kids get measles and mumps to prevent asthma. Why stop there? A little smallpox never hurt anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terry4kerry Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. only 10 children from each site
I am surprised that they could only come up with a sample size of 10 from each site. Unfortunately this number does not have enough participants to gain conclusive information. I work with many children in the projects of NYC and there is a huge percentage with very bad asthma, something that needs to continue on-going exploration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. had the study fingered smokers, 10 subjects per site would have been plenty...
... from many people's point of view. Although I agree with you that more data would be better.

I posted this article as food for thought for those of us who take an interest in policies concerning public smoking, and in societal attitudes toward smoking and smokers.

A common rationale for banning smoking in public places has been that cigarette smoke is a form of particulate air pollution that is highly damaging to asthmatics, children, and asthmatic children. This study suggests that of all particulate pollution, it's actually the 5-10% caused by diesel exhaust that is the uniquely potent asthma trigger that some people claim cigarette smoke to be.

Only a minority of us smoke, but ALL of us rely on the burning of hydrocarbons. Our entire lifestyle is based on that. Pollution-caused diseases are the result of our collective choices; it's just not fair to attempt to pin a special portion of blame on the stigmatised population who choose to smoke tobacco.


Full disclosure: I'm asthmatic, and a lifelong non-smoker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC