Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: Costly Coast Guard Fleet Update Falters (Another fiasco!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:45 PM
Original message
WP,pg1: Costly Coast Guard Fleet Update Falters (Another fiasco!)
Costly Fleet Update Falters
Contractors Oversee Coast Guard Project
By Renae Merle and Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 8, 2006; Page A01

A multibillion-dollar effort to modernize the Coast Guard's fleet has suffered delays, cost increases, design flaws and, most recently, the idling of eight 123-foot patrol boats that were found to be not seaworthy after an $88 million refurbishment.

The sidelining of eight of 10 Miami-based cutters worsens a patrol-boat crisis while the Coast Guard is preparing for an exodus of Cubans that could happen when dictator Fidel Castro is no longer in power, Coast Guard leaders acknowledge.

More broadly, congressional critics warn that early mistakes in the 25-year modernization program, called Deepwater -- the Coast Guard's largest contract ever -- are hobbling the service's transformation into a front-line homeland security force.

With the failure of the retrofitting program, eight of 49 boats in the service's workhorse fleet of Island-class patrol boats are out of action. Coast Guard leaders reported last year that only 25 percent of the aging cutters were fully "mission capable," because of maintenance problems and deployment of some boats to Iraq. In reports submitted to Congress, the Coast Guard projected that the fleet would be able to log about 80 percent of its targeted 98,200 operational hours a year.

Meanwhile, a Coast Guard plan to fill the gap by accelerating development of its next-generation cutter by 10 years has stalled because of technical problems....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/07/AR2006120702037.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.....what a surprise....
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. hundreds of billions to throw away in iraq and they cant find the money
to run the coast guard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. 88 million was not enough to adequately update/repair eight
123 foot patrol boats?

Who the hell is doing/did that work?????????????????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They lengthend the ship
They stretched the 110ft boat by adding a rear launch and recovery ramp like on the newer cutters. Apparently the added lift aft is causing metal fatigue when operated in high seas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So 88 million isn't enough? To do it right? That's crazy. Does
anyone ever think about this? How much it is costing the American people for anything. 11 million dollars each and they fucked it up?????

Each ship, each plane we pay for costs tens of millions. Why? Does anyone really think that it costs 24 million dollars to build one jet? Does anyone else really think that either they should never have tried to lengthen these boats or that for 11 million dollars they should have done it right? I mean, am I being unreasonable in thinking that I should get the bang I expect out of my buck, even if it is the incompetents in the federal government who are spending the money?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Republicans have been in total control of every aspect of the federal government for 6 years.
This is par for the course with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC