Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Senate Approves Anti-Pretexting Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 01:01 AM
Original message
AP: Senate Approves Anti-Pretexting Bill
Senate Approves Anti-Pretexting Bill

By JOHN DUNBAR
The Associated Press
Saturday, December 9, 2006; 12:10 AM

WASHINGTON -- After more than eight months in limbo, a bill that would criminalize
the practice of lying to obtain the telephone records of private citizens passed
the Senate late Friday.

The Senate approved the anti-pretexting bill by a voice vote. The House passed it
in April. It now goes to the White House for approval.

"Stealing someone's private phone records is a criminal act that can now be prosecuted,"
said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., lead sponsor of the proposal in the Senate. "Phone
information and call logs should be protected with the same safeguards as financial
data or medical records."

-snip-

The legislation outlaws the practice of getting confidential phone records by "making
false or fraudulent statements" to a phone company employee, by "obtaining false or
fraudulent documents to access accounts" or by "accessing customer accounts through
the Internet" without authorization.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/09/AR2006120900043.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now apply that to Gonzales & Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. bush will do one of his signing statements making himself exempt.
little criminal that he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should also outlaw possession of records
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 10:01 AM by formercia
without written permission or a court order.

What's the point if someone could just claim they obtained the records from someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC