Post-9/11 limits on dissent claimed

Law enforcement cites terror threat

WASHINGTON -- Two years into the post-Sept. 11 era, police across the country are cracking down on street protests, and federal prosecutors are invoking obscure laws to punish activists whose aggressive displays of political expression were once more tolerated, according to groups as diverse as Operation Rescue and Greenpeace.

While law-enforcement officials acknowledge only that the specter of terrorism has made them more wary of large crowds and disruptive behavior, activists say the newly aggressive tactics are jeopardizing a form of dissent as rooted in American tradition as the Boston Tea Party.

On Friday, lawyers for Greenpeace USA, the environmental activist organization, were in a Miami federal court to defend the group against unheard-of criminal charges of breaking an obscure 19th-century law against "sailor mongering."

snip>

"While the protest itself may have no relationship to terrorism, the presence of protesters could be a vehicle for people with other issues on their minds," Firman said. "The police have the obligation to respond in a heightened way because of that window of opportunity." In practice, that increased awareness can make protesters feel as if they are "viewed not as citizens with a right to protest but as an enemy and a threat" for something as simple as showing up with a sign, said Operation Rescue president Troy Newman.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/12/14/post_911_limits_on_dissent_claimed?mode=PF

....this sounds like another piece of the right wing vote that won't be supporting Junior.

That has occurred because of a large crowd of protesters?

Just wondering.

I, for one, wouldn't mind tossing some Repugnicans into the Boston harbor...