Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush to call for 20 percent reduction in gasoline usage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:29 AM
Original message
Bush to call for 20 percent reduction in gasoline usage

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/01/bush-to-call-for-20-percent-reduction.html

Bush to call for 20 percent reduction in gasoline usage

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush will call for a 20 percent reduction of gasoline usage over the next 10 years in his State of the Union Address Tuesday night, a senior Administration official tells CNN.

By decreasing gasoline usage among consumers, the president will say it's in the nation's security interest increase the supply of the government's Strategic Petroleum Reserve -- the nation's oil supply that is only tapped in crises.

The president will also push for more renewable and alternative energy sources -- initiatives he has pushed previously.

CNN has also learned the president will call for a balanced budget by 2012 and advocate several measures to accomplish this including a decrease of pet projects by members of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is he talking about gasoline rationing as during the second
world war, with "no unnecessary traveling"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Probably
Whatever that man wants, it's bad for the people who live in this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Yikes.
:scared: That makes too much sense. No doubt there's a sinister ulterior motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
58. I'd bet he's talking about poor people walking while the rich drive Hummers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. bushie is going to promote other energy resources
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 11:33 AM by alyce douglas
I wish he would take his own advice and stop invading and bombing other countries to get his oil fix. What a hypocrite!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush to call for 20 percent reduction in gasoline usage
Hell, we could do that if Bush would just keep his bush at home. Grounding Air Force One, not taking all those trips around the world where he really isn't welcome, and all those vacations to Crawford, we could save a ton of fuel.

So stay home, Bush. You might work on your explanations to Congress for your actions. You'll be needing them in the coming months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. That's the truth!
Between his many vacations, and his fund raising trips, which I expect will start again before the 2008 elections, the country could probably reduce gasoline usage by at least 20%. I wonder how much fuel the war in Iraq is costing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, if he only cuts out his vacations to Crawford...
That should save a whole-lotta gas. I doubt AF1 is very fuel efficient...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. How about we cut the gasoline allotment for the military first? We can start in Iraq.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 11:39 AM by sinkingfeeling
Then we can reduce the use of US gov't. fleet vehicles and limos by about 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INDIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
62. Great idea!
I'm calling speaker Pelosi's office TODAY and telling her to cut gasoline supplies to the military in IRAQ!!!! We should make this a Democratic talking point! Can't you just imagine? All those gas-guzzling armored Hummers, APC's and Tanks sitting around useless!

The troops can walk instead! GREAT IDEA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. How about more money for public transit?
I doubt his plan includes that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
59. Sheesh. It's hard enough to get Democrats to talk seriously about public transit.
I wasn't exactly holding my breath while reading the transcripts of his little talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. pet projects ? don't trust him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. How about that Mission to Mars? Great Huh?
Bush is in the habit of declaring things during the SOTU that he has no intention of backing up with money. In this case it's a fuel economy program that pushes all the pain till after he's out of office

Count this in as one of them.

The GOP would be insane to run a front line candidate in '08. The presidency will come with a stable neck high in shit and a toy shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds like a good idea to me, regardless of the source
But then, saying is always easier than doing.

We could achieve this in three years if driving fuel-efficient machines became stylish.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I agree...
I would love to see details. Like improved public transportation, tax incentives for hybrid cars, and high gas efficiency cars, reduced tolls for carpooling. I'd like to see major manufacturer incentives to the Big Three car companies to produce high fuel efficiency and hybrid cars, which get over 30mpg CITY, preferably 40-60MPG City. I'd also like to see major manufacturer incentives to produce high fuel efficiency buses for public transportation, and long-distance transportation, and incentives to cities and states to improve and expand public transportation.

I'd also like to see an expansion of Amtrak, if it promoted greater fuel efficiency.

Last, given the INCREDIBLE advances we've made in communication technology, I'd like to see increases in "in-home" employment opportunities.

But i sense that I'm dreaming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Probably acheive it without doing anything
When gas goes back over $3 this spring, people will start to conserve fuel again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. As usual, CNN spinning for Bush
and ignoring past and present reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. "Addicted to oil" has a WHOLE year ago
:eyes:

ABC did have an article up entitled "What happened to Bush wheat grass?"

now it says "Bush to Offer Bold Energy Plan"

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2816080
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Won't do a bit of good.
at the rate new drivers are put on the road, a 20% reduction over ten years won't even register a blip on lowing our oil needs.

He* needs to raise MPG on new cars, tax the oil bastards, institute a real energy program and fund solar and wind power. he* needs to get off the hydrogen and ethanol bullshit wagon and fund public transit.

we are so fucked. plain and simple. action is what needs to be taken now, but all we are going to get is more of morons* "programs" that are never funded or endorsed.

I will not be listening to the dribbling idiot son* tonight. Stupid people* make my brain hurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hmmm....
President asks for 20% reduction of gas.

We attack Iran.

Iran attacks Saudi Processing plants.

U.S. gets screwed with a destroyed economy and 3rd World War.



Well my Outlook Calendar is full how about you fine folks?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. So he's going to stop flying to photo ops in Air Force I?
That alone would probably do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Oh, don't forget his late night flight from Texas to Washington re: Schiavo
As if that was necessary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babydollhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. does that mean ending NASCAR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. There's a good idea.
I vaguely remember hearing that during WWII the Indy 500 was shortened to save on fuel/rubber.

Better yet, let's have a Daytona 500 in pedal cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fNord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. God I hope so n/t
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Stop using gas guzzler SUV's and order the owners arrested
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 12:18 PM by HawkeyeX
for using them if they don't sell it to Haliburton for destruction within the next 10 days, after Haliburton pays full value of the SUV and tell them to buy a hybrid (thus creating new US jobs) Toyota or Hondas or even Ford.

Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. Haha!
I like that idea. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Same as a call for 'voluntary CO2 emissions reduction': worthless.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 12:32 PM by mainegreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. More meaningless babble from the puppet of the oil industry.
Is this useless gesture supposed to make Bush, the gutless puppet of industry, look like an environmentalist?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. And tomorrow Tony Snow
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 12:50 PM by CJCRANE
will tell us that * didn't "literally" mean 20%, it was just an example or guideline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Bush to Offer Bold Energy Plan (ABC)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I take that back then...
However, I like the link in the middle of the article:

"Which Unfulfilled Promise Should Bush Revisit?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
63. i think they mean 20% of 2017 levels, not 20% of today's levels. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. CAFE standards. Period. End of story.
If you were serious about that, fucker, the 2005 energy bill would have mentioned. Since it did not. You are not serious about it. Therefore, spare me the fucking political theater.

Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. He is serious. Not about CAFE standards but ...
He has 3 ways to lower fuel consumption.
1) The most obvious is raising the CAFE standards.
A car with a 20 MPG rating, raised to 24 MPG could accomplish this.
2) Raise the price of gas, so 20% less people can afford it.
3) Ration 20% less gas to everyone who needs it.

What do you think he'll do? I'd bet on #2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Great
Are they going to increase public transporation? In Pittsburgh, they're cutting public transportation. How the &^#@! are we supposed to get anywhere?

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07023/756042-147.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Damn right!
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 05:07 PM by Toucano
Divert all those dollars to make 12 lane highways to natural gas powered public transportation.

Eliminate the tax breaks for SUVs and give people tax breaks when they buy a transit pass or card.

There's so much room for improvement in our national policy.

EDIT:

And give employers who pay for their employees public transportation expenses tax breaks instead of those who provide a company car.

Hell, in some small towns where one factory is the main employer, the company could send a shuttle service to collect employees before the shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hmmm... so what about your corporate COAL pals?
Nothing from them, Bush? Dickhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. Carlyle Group is busy into ethanol plants.
I was researching ethanol plants, one in particular that is going up in a town I have an interest in, and who did I notice was one of the owners of said brand spanking new ethanol plant? Yep. Carlyle Group. If they can't get all the oil they can out of a torn up Middle East, they are going to take over the ethanol plants in this country. I don't know if it means anything or not, just something that jumped out at me.

Yeah, I bet NASCAR does burn up a lot of fuel. And how 'bout Monster Truck racing or whatever it's called? eh...can't take all the fun out of life. We can wait until there's a complete breakdown in the economy for that. ::sarcasm::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. When did ETHANOL become such a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. When oil reached $70 a barrel.
I think that's how it was explained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. December 12, 2000...
ever since then, my ethanol use has increased substantially :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moby Grape Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
61. when MTBE got banned
when MTBE got banned,
the market turned to ethanol.

ethanol now is used in a lot of gas,
and spreading.

for the record, MTBE was not banned,
the Energy policy act of '05 took
away the legal protection MTBE had from lawsuits,
so everybody stopped using it.

ethanol needs special handleing,
the MTBE 'ban' is helping put
the needed ethanol infrastructure in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. How much gas do the unemployed need?
Personally, I already save about 90%.

If I don't do any long distance driving I could probably go at least 2 months without filling up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. Didn't he say something similar last year, only to flip-flops minutes later?
His SOTU speech last year said something about being addicted to oil and calling for a reduction in the amounts we import from the Middle East...

Only minutes after the speech, his Commerce Secretary was furiously backing away from those remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. yep.
that's what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. How is that initiative going?
Last I heard on Thom Hartmann was that we're importing almost 20% more foreign oil than we did when Bush took office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. All previous SOTU statements on energy. Rhetoric anyone?
* 2006 State of the Union: Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy.
And here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often
imported from unstable parts of the world. The best way to break this addiction
is through technology.

* 2005 State of the Union: To keep our economy growing, we also need reliable
supplies of affordable, environmentally responsible energy

* 2004 State of the Union: Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy
to make our economy run -- so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our
electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign
sources of energy.

* 2003 State of the Union: Our third goal is to promote energy independence for our
country, while dramatically improving the environment

* 2002 State of the Union: Good jobs also depend on reliable and affordable energy.
This Congress must act to encourage conservation, promote technology, build
infrastructure, and it must act to increase energy production at home so America
is less dependent on foreign oil.

* 2001 State of the Union: We can promote alternative energy sources and conservation,
and we must. America must become more energy-independent, and we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. thanks for that list
What a gas-bag that man is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yahooo
20% fewer town hall meeting, 20% fewer photo opps, and dare I say....20% fewr fund raisers? Dare I hope for 20% increase in public transportation.

What an ass wipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hrmpf. Gas is up 16c today at the BP (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Saw another story on this - it's all about ethanol - in other words, nothing to see here
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 03:26 PM by hatrack
If you planted every acre of land now under cultivation in the United States in corn dedicated only to ethanol production, it would cut our oil consumption by 13%, and that's at today's rates of consumption.

Of course, we're already on the brink of starting a serious trade dispute with Mexico, since the demand for corn for the ethanol industry as it exists today is making the price of tortillas skyrocket. So, take this existing scenario and imagine what would happen with a projected buildout this big.

Expansion of this magnitude would also mean that the costs of pretty much all other agricultural commodities- i.e. "food" - would rise quickly and steadily, since acres switched to corn are acres NOT planted in soybeans, wheat, milo, durum, beets, potatoes, what have you. This is also a 100% guaranteed way of raising the cost of beef, pork and chicken.

Finally, since the entire industrial corn production machine rests upon non-renewable natural gas for fertilizer, oil for pesticides and herbicides and huge amounts of fuel inputs for pumping, transportation and drying, this is plain and simple an non-starter in the long run.

More bullshit to make it look like President Pantload is on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. Wonder what the states think of that?
Since most of them depend on the sales taxes from gasoline sales to fund road projects. Wonder if he ran this idea by the governors?

Nah.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
43. Is this like the Mars expedition he proposed
a few SOTUs ago?

Sounds good-- thinkin' big-- blah blah blah. Not gonna happen-- at least on Bush's watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
45. Calling on consumers to conserve is great.
It should have happened A LONG TIME AGO.

It would be even better if he gave them the means to do so.

Real leadership on the issue would set up a internet based network to facilitate carpooling where people who work along the same routes could login to find rides.

Consumers could be encouraged (or reminded) to ask their neighbors if they need anything before making that run to the supermarket.

Unplanned and unnecessary trips should be avoided as much as possible. Do you really need to return to the store for that forgotten item when the Earth is in the balance?

Be a real community. Share.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. We could save that if he kept still and didn't use gas vacationing
every other week or so. Also for a lame brain who never left the country on his own dime, he sure is seeing the world on ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
51. Hasn't he mentioned energy policy in every SOTU?
Look how good that's paid off!

...

What a crock of sh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
52. Forget it
I suppose he expects the rest of us to cut back so him and his fat-cat pals can have more for their use...I'm not falling for that. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
53. Better park Air Force One then!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
55. Actions speak louder than words
I don't trust that rat bastard for one second. He'll find a way to make it benefit his corporate cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
57. "Here's the agenda I'm going to set out for other people after I'm out of office."
"CNN has also learned the president will call for a balanced budget by 2012."

Yep, after 6+ years of aggressively UNbalancing the budget, he's just not going to stand for one more second of fiscal irresponsibility! Even if he was serious, where is he going to get all of that extra cash to balance the budget with? Hmmmmm ...

"President Bush will call for a 20 percent reduction of gasoline usage over the next 10 years ..."

So that his Exxon have's-and-have-more buddies can raise the price due to slackening public demand?

More likely he wants everyone else to get by with less cheap energy so that corporations can use up more. I wouldn't be surprised to see him try to enforce gasoline quotas on us all - with the National Guard, if necessary. It's President Credibility, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
60. Just make cars that get 40+ mpg. and the probelm is solved!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pcboss49 Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
64. reason for price hike at the pumps....
Stating that we need to cut our gas usage by 20% gives the oil companies free rein to raise prices at the pumps to slow down usage... yeah, right... and our economy is doing so well? Just wait, when gas goes over $5 or $6 per gallon, our economy will come to a screeching halt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
65. How? Everything this guy has pushed has increased gas usage. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
66. Twenty percent or more reduction will happen, voluntarily or otherwise
The problem is that the four biggest supergiant oil fields on the planet are all crashing. Badly.

This includes Cantarell in Mexico, Burgan in Kuwait, DaQing in China, and the dying elephant, Ghawar, in Saudi Arabia.

Might want to learn to appreciate public transportation, bicycling, and walking, sooner than later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. 20 percent reduction in gasoline usage - we will never - ever hear anything about this again...
because of it's absurdity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. Not a voluntary option as per Georgie's lies ...
... but prescient nonetheless (see #66 above).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
68. Again, it's just designed to sound good
Bush and his oil buddies will never give the incentives needed to truly reduce gas usage and go to alternative fuels. In fact, oil companies charge more for gas on purpose when cleaner and more energy efficient fuels are introduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
69. Increase federal gas tax $1.00 for starters
then increase CAFE standards. Legislate auto manufacturers into increasing mileage standsrd for all cars and trucks next week!!

But this is just all window dressing to the bigger problem of peak oil. We cann go on keeping our head in the sand but it won't change the fact that its coming..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
70. NEVER HAPPEN!@
EVERYBODY KNOS TEH B1G O1L COMAPNY'S ARE HIDING CAR ENGINE'S TAHT GET OVER 200 MPH ON A GLASS OF WYLERS GRAPE DRINK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fNord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
71. In 10 years, there WILL NOT be any fossil fuels left!!!!!
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 08:45 PM by fNord
At the current rate of consumption, we will have completely drained mother earth of her blood a short wile before 2017. remember people, that fossil fuels are not only used to make gasoline or fuel power plants, they are also the prime ingredient in almost every thing used by the modern world. every piece of plastic (that means everything from the bottle of pepsi you bought on the way to work to the car you drove to C-D's and DVDs to the monitor you are viewing this Post on), synthetic fabrics and fibers, synthetic rubbers, asphalt, synthetic organs, and lest we forget, most pharmaceuticals as well. in short, this is one promise that monkey boy might actually keep, not because he or his regime are prepared to take the necessary steps, but ironically, because he wont. Basically We are completely fucking screwed. :scared:




"Good night, and good luck"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC