Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats wary of Bush on Social Security reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:27 PM
Original message
Democrats wary of Bush on Social Security reform
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With President George W. Bush still intent on overhauling Social Security, Democrats who control Congress show no sign of backing off their opposition to his proposal to create private investment accounts.

While it was unclear whether Bush would launch another big effort in his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, lawmakers were showing some fresh interest in tackling the program's long-term financial shortfall with the looming retirement of the 77 million-strong baby boom generation.

It will take a strong bipartisan effort to tackle what are bound to be politically unpopular moves that could include raising taxes and cutting benefits.

"We're prepared to work with the president in a bipartisan way," said U.S. House of Representatives Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland. But if Bush insists, as he has in the past, that any overhaul include his proposal to divert some Social Security taxes into individual investment accounts then "we are not going to have much success," Hoyer added.

A number of behind-the-scenes bipartisan discussions among lawmakers suggest some new flexibility. Democrats, now in control in the House and Senate, point to discussions with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2007-01-23T212451Z_01_N23291697_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-SPEECH-SOCIALSECURITY.xml&WTmodLoc=Home-C5-politicsNews-2

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would prefer the phrase "downright hostile."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Downright
don't let corps get the frigging fingers into it and tax them to get the money back they have robbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Wary" my sweet Aunt Fanny
Actively opposed is more like it. And there is really nothing wrong with the Social Security Trust Fund, unless you really, really believe that the United States is about to hit a sustained period of negative economic growth and that people will be working to age 62 and living to age 147.

Any "shortfall" shows up when the numbers are projected out not 50 years or 100 years, but to infinity. And since the period is "infinite," there is no projected shortfall, because any shortage over an infinite time period becomes insignificant when amortized year by year. A penny a year could cover it, because an infinite number of pennies would overwhelm any projected shortfall.

Who buys this snake oil, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. my first thought as well
wary? - I thought the word was opposed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many years has it been since the cap was raised on SS? Usually that is the answer to fixing it
and making it hands off for any other use - Gore's lockbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's a good idea. In fact we should just get rid of the cap all together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why the fuck should we let them increase SS taxes?
Reagan did it in the 80's, to save social security back then by building up a surplus.

Then the fucking Republicans stole the surplus money and used it to fund general expenses.

And those taxes are the regressive ones, that don't even impact people earning over $80K per year.

There is no way they should increase ss taxes, unless and until
#1) the non-SS budget is balanced by increasing the top tax rate by whatever it takes to balance the budget
#2) the entire SS surplus has been restored, again, by increasing taxes on the rich which were cut and CAUSED the budget deficits
#3) the cap on SS wages is eliminated totally.
#4) a mechanism is put into place to prevent future Congresses from raiding the SS surplus to pay for tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. They gave the money to the wealthy
That's what Clinton's surplus was supposed to do, pay down the debt so when our social security needed to be repaid, there'd be general fund money to do it. That's all the tax cut money Bush gave away to the rich these last 6 years. If we let them bullshit us with more taxes AGAIN, then the whole country is full of nothing but idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. stop wars and fund SS - stop wasting our money on their raises - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. bush 'reform' of anything means YOU are about to get a TOTAL.......
SCREWING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Privatization
The man knows nothing else. His "health care" plan is more of the same. I hope that goes down the tubes too. I took a good sized pay decrease to get good Aemployer health PLAN. So, on MY $9.89/hour they are going to tax this so the "poor" can have coverage? I don't think so. On my salary, what the hell am I? RICH? I will drop ALL my medical coverage if that happens. So I will die sooner rather than later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Junior wants you to drop your employer-provided healthcare
That is actually the purpose of his health care proposal: to end employer-provided healthcare. In return, you get the privelege of privately buying a private insurance policy for yourself in Junior's brave new privatized world. Insurance companies will be happy to sell you a policy if you don't actually need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. They better be. Bush's intent has always been to eliminate Social Security.
Everything else is just a smoke screen. Like the man said, "Fool me once..."


Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. He needs to keep his thieving greedy hands off SS. That's been a goal
since day one to give SS to his Wall Street buddies. It sticks in his craw that he hasn't been able to let them loot the system.

There is no reason to be doing anything right now.

Suggestions:

1. Pay back the money they stole for this immoral war.
2. Stop sending all our jobs out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wholeheartedly Agreed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC